Nuseir Yassin better known as Nas of Nas Daily was recently under fire from local Singaporeans for his ultra-positive video about Singapore which he made during his short visit to the island – calling it an ‘almost perfect’ country.

In response to backlash and accusations that his video was sponsored, Nas clarified that the one-minute travel log of the Lion City was not sponsored. He later also clarified to the Strait Times that 97% of his videos aren’t sponsored. He apparently just really liked what he saw in Singapore.

However, NTUC Income recently released a video on their Facebook that shows Nas promoting their retirement plan. In fact, Nas says right at the beginning that it is a sponsored video.

Now, the video was obviously shot in Singapore so it was almost certainly filmed at the same time that Nas filmed his other ‘not-sponsored’ videos about Singapore including the one about Singapore’s waste management system which has received over 65 million views on Facebook.

What’s interesting here is that although Nas has insisted that his other videos about Singapore weren’t paid for, NTUC is closely aligned with the government. Its current secretary general Ng Chee Meng is a PAP minister while a number of MPs head various divisions within NTUC such as the NTUC Fairprice CEO Seah Kian Peng.

So, this begs the question, did NTUC approach Nas because of his reach as a vlogger on social media or was it because they liked what they say in all his positive videos about Singapore?

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Police issues warning against plans to protest in Singapore over current situation in Myanmar

The police have issued a warning against plans to hold protests in…

三官委议员坚持立场力争修《防假消息法》遭否决

5月8日,《防止网络假信息和网络操纵法案》在国会经过两天、超过13小时的马拉松辩论,最终以72赞成票、九张反对票、三张弃权票,三读通过。共有七名部长和次长、31名议员参与相关辩论,其中三名官委议员:王丽婷、特斯拉和郭秀钦,争取通过他们的修法建议但遭否决,在三读时投弃权票。 在辩论进行时,王丽婷数度提出《防假信息法》的修改建议,包括了要求部长们保证能够更加严格看待修正建议、将部长和政府的权限写入法案主体中、要求设立独立的理事会监督执法、还有上诉程序中的缺陷等等。 他们也呼吁政府修改法案中,对“事实”和“不真实信息”的定义,因为目前的定义仍然太过宽泛和主观。 在针对上诉程序中,三人建议在法案中加入一个阐明更多立法原则的条文,并且建议上诉程序必须迅速且成本低。惟,但是尚穆根对此建议表示不认同,他认为三人提出的原则过于宽泛,与之相比,政府反而给出了更具体的时间表。 三人多数建议中,有些在第二次辩论中就已经不被采纳,因此他们决定弃权。 特斯拉更是数度要求国会秘书将有关的弃权票数记录在案。 间中,工人党党魁毕丹星也曾经一度站起来发言,表示对于他们之前不被采纳的建议,每一条都投弃权票。(工人党立场是反对《防假消息法》) 工人党议员之前曾表示,法案将导致寒蝉效应,严重影响人们言论自由。 网民评论有褒有贬 三名官委议员的表现,在《网络公民》脸书专页上载后,网民反应有褒有贬。有人按赞,为三人的表现鼓掌,有人感到无奈,也有人觉得力量不足。 有网民对他们的表现感到敬佩,甚至称赞他们为勇敢的火枪手(brave musketeers)。…

Activist Jolovan Wham says TODAYonline’s comment about him failing to testify in court is misleading

Civil right activist Jolovan Wham said that the Facebook caption and headline…

港警锁定700示威者 部分示威者逃海外

香港反送中长达一个月,期间爆发多起警民冲突,据《南华早报》报道,港警已锁定逾700示威者,包括参与七一攻入立法会、七一四沙田冲突事件等冲突事件。 警方还将示威者分为“烈士”与“和理非”两类。 前者约200-300名示威者,站在游行前方,挑衅警方并对警方使用武器与暴力,在攻击警方后撤退;后者则是以“和平、理性与非暴力”示威,负责传送物品如安全帽、生理食盐水、保鲜膜等到前线。 据了解,警方会先确认“烈士”示威者身份,再来确认“和理非”示威者的身份,将以帮助及教唆犯罪活动拘捕他们。 示威者以蒙面、喷漆方式躲过警方追捕 消息人士透露大部分参与人士皆25岁以下,包括许多高中及大学生,有部分相信已逃离香港。台湾维权人士亦披露,逾30名示威者已寻求台湾庇护。 示威者透过多种方法逃避警方追捕,如穿戴安全帽、手套与眼罩,隐藏自己的身份、喷漆在闭路电视、冲警警方后在雨伞阵后更衣离开现场,逃避警方追查 尽管移除面具或更衣后,警方仍从示威者逃跑路线中的闭路电视,以人脸辨识系统确认身份。 反送中活动愈演愈烈,香港政府于6月12日预计进行《逃犯条例》修订二度,却引发香港有史以来最大规模的示威活动,警民更多次爆发严重冲突,7月1日晚示威者强撞立法会大门,占领、毁坏、涂鸦立法会一夜,被政府斥为暴徒,对政府不利的舆论稍歇。 示威者在没有警方驻守下,墙上涂鸦,并写上“太阳花”、“释放义士”、“反送中”、“真普选”等字眼,甚至涂鸦会议厅香港区徽和历任立法会主席肖像。 7月14日,香港再次于新界北的上水、金钟与沙田,以“反水货客”主题的“光复上水”运动发起示威活动,游行活动和平进行,但却在游行活动结束后即爆发警民冲突。游行结束后现场气氛转趋紧张,大量示威者占据马路与警员对峙,期间更爆发激烈冲突。报道称,示威者在冲突爆发期间投掷雨伞等杂物,警方则挥动警棍与胡椒喷雾。 7月21日,民阵又再次发起示威活动,于晚间10点,元朗西铁站聚集了大批“白衣人士”,声称在附近巡视,若见身着黑衣便会认定是从港岛参加游行回来,对他们进行围殴。据悉,白衣人士以“保卫元朗”为名,部分人手持长伞及竹条,追打身穿黑衣的人,但不仅是示威者,还有记者和普通民众受伤。警方在暴力事件发生后半小时,姗姗来迟,多名市民向警方质问为何姗姗来迟,情绪激动。…