by Lim Jialiang

On Dishwashing – One of the most perplexing costs that I have seen in the new social enterprise hawker centres is their monthly costs for dishwashing. They range around $800-$1100 a month, and that’s before GST. Think of how much revenue a store has to generate before that kind of cost made sense.

In older NEA hawker centres, they are built without centralised washing points. This is because not all stores have the same kind of washing load – unlike a food court, who is owned by one operator, it makes no sense to derive economies of scale (this seems to be favourite phrase these days).

For hawker centres, those who have more low-volume sales shouldn’t be subsidising those who have high volume sales. Those who sell food that is more for takeaways also have to pay that fixed cost. Even for table-cleaning charges, which is the norm in hawker centres here, A distinction is also made for those who sell drinks/takeaways food – they pay a smaller cost.

There are quite a few companies out there that provide this service, and they basically integrate logistics with heavy mechanisation. I know of one company that operates a fully automated dishwashing system – staff are only in charge of loading dirty cutlery and dishes into a gargantuan system of conveyor belts, sterilising points and dishwashing machines. Most importantly, their costs are extremely reasonable. No cutlery? They’ll loan it at a deposit.

This is unlike the social enterprise hawker centres who impose on hawkers plate purchasing costs. I bring this up because there should be serious enquires on NEA’s part on who these companies are and why do they cost so much. These contracts should be audited by competitiveness.

However, these encapsulate the broader,  mistaken impression that hawker trade is not efficient or productive enough. Do you honestly think that small, lean operations that do a job 12 hours a day, 7 days a week, will not be efficient in doing things? If people aren’t washing dishes in machines, it’s because the costs don’t make sense.

The picture taken above, is at a popular fish store in Eunos (I will take the exact location to my grave because it’s amazing and I have to queue long enough already) who has recently engaged services for a dishwashing company. Cutlery comes in those blue boxes. Once they are done with them, they loaded the boxes up with dirty dishes. The logistics team collects it and sends it back in the morning. It works for them because they can move hundreds of bowls in a day. But they are an exception, a very small minority of hawkers. Most stores, instead, do their dishwashing during off-peak hours.

Not all centralised dishwashing services are created equal, and not all hawker stores need these services. Finally, let’s call a spade a spade and recognise that the attendant charges, like a SingTel phone bill, are the result of a very lackadaisical attitude towards managing social enterprise management companies. Let us not confuse nebulous anti-competitiveness with productivity.

This article was first published on Lim Jialiang’s Facebook page and reproduced with permission.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

非法进口2.5吨蔬菜 商家被罚7500元

一家公司非法自邻国马来西亚进口超过2.5吨的新鲜蔬菜,遭新加坡食品局(SFA)罚款7500元。 当局于昨日(7月3日)发文告指出,农粮与兽医局(AVA,新加坡食品局前身)官员在今年3月,在Gold Horse Enterprise有限公司自马国进口的蔬菜中,检测到未经申报和少申报的新鲜蔬菜,总重量达2585公斤。 当局在发给《亚洲新闻台》的电子邮件中指出,查获的蔬菜包括有韭菜、辣椒、葱、芥菜、薄荷、枸杞、四季豆、菜心、甜玉米、日本小黄瓜和西葫芦。 所有的非法货物都被扣押和销毁。 唯恐造成食品安全风向 当局指出,非法进口食品来源不明,还会造成食品安全的风险。 “在新加坡,进口食品必须符合新加坡食品局的要求和食物安全标准。食品只能由持牌的进口商进口,每批货物必须申报,并附上有效的进口许可证。” 至于被判定触犯非法进口食品罪的人或公司,将被罚款不超过一万元,或者面对不超过三年的监禁。

Dr Chee Soon Juan: Meet-the-people session one time a week is not enough

Dr Chee Soon Juan, Secretary-General of the Singapore Democratic Party and candidate…

马外长:马新水供仍可谈 惟外交部重申尊重原协议

马来西亚外交部长拿督赛夫丁阿都拉于本周一(30日)到访狮城,拜会总统哈莉玛、总理李显龙和外交部长维文,表达马新合作、加强双边关系意愿。 此次拜访,也被视作马国新政府成立后,正式拜会我国,并针对一些主要课题如两国合作议程、马新高铁、马新水供等课题,进行初步照会。 赛夫丁向马国官方媒体马新社(Bernama)透露,马新水供协议仍可进行检讨。他认为,1962年马新水供协议,双方可在签署后的25年检讨,并不代表在第25年才能检讨条款,因此新马双方可继续讨论协议内容。 他说,在会面时,我国总理李显龙也主动询问马方在水供协议和马新高铁的立场,而他则尽量阐明,令我国明白当前马国面对的情况。 赛夫丁补充,经济部长阿兹敏已在7月23日针对马新高铁计划展延,致函新加坡,相信很快就会展开会谈。 在6月22日,马国首相敦马在接受彭博社专访时,曾提及马新水供水价“荒谬”,有意重新协商水价。 赛夫丁相信,上述两件课题,并不会影响两国友好关系。 外交部长维文也在脸书贴文,欢迎赛夫丁与夫人到访。他说,两国盘点了新马合作项目,并对新的契机交换意见。他也期待两国部长和官员继续互访。 维文伉俪也设午宴招待赛夫丁和夫人拿汀诺林及马方代表团。较后,赛夫丁也拜会我国副总理兼国家安全统筹部长张志贤。 外交部重申:双方不能单方面更改条款 虽然赛夫丁提及,马新都能针对水供协议提出新提案,但是外交部于7月31日发文告重申,对于1962年马新水供协议,新加坡立场与7月9日发出的声明一致,即马新两国必须尊重先前顶下的国际协议,双方都不能单方面更改条款。 “马来西亚在1987年,选择不调整水价,认为他们仍在协议中获益。”…