by Lim Jialiang

On Dishwashing – One of the most perplexing costs that I have seen in the new social enterprise hawker centres is their monthly costs for dishwashing. They range around $800-$1100 a month, and that’s before GST. Think of how much revenue a store has to generate before that kind of cost made sense.

In older NEA hawker centres, they are built without centralised washing points. This is because not all stores have the same kind of washing load – unlike a food court, who is owned by one operator, it makes no sense to derive economies of scale (this seems to be favourite phrase these days).

For hawker centres, those who have more low-volume sales shouldn’t be subsidising those who have high volume sales. Those who sell food that is more for takeaways also have to pay that fixed cost. Even for table-cleaning charges, which is the norm in hawker centres here, A distinction is also made for those who sell drinks/takeaways food – they pay a smaller cost.

There are quite a few companies out there that provide this service, and they basically integrate logistics with heavy mechanisation. I know of one company that operates a fully automated dishwashing system – staff are only in charge of loading dirty cutlery and dishes into a gargantuan system of conveyor belts, sterilising points and dishwashing machines. Most importantly, their costs are extremely reasonable. No cutlery? They’ll loan it at a deposit.

This is unlike the social enterprise hawker centres who impose on hawkers plate purchasing costs. I bring this up because there should be serious enquires on NEA’s part on who these companies are and why do they cost so much. These contracts should be audited by competitiveness.

However, these encapsulate the broader,  mistaken impression that hawker trade is not efficient or productive enough. Do you honestly think that small, lean operations that do a job 12 hours a day, 7 days a week, will not be efficient in doing things? If people aren’t washing dishes in machines, it’s because the costs don’t make sense.

The picture taken above, is at a popular fish store in Eunos (I will take the exact location to my grave because it’s amazing and I have to queue long enough already) who has recently engaged services for a dishwashing company. Cutlery comes in those blue boxes. Once they are done with them, they loaded the boxes up with dirty dishes. The logistics team collects it and sends it back in the morning. It works for them because they can move hundreds of bowls in a day. But they are an exception, a very small minority of hawkers. Most stores, instead, do their dishwashing during off-peak hours.

Not all centralised dishwashing services are created equal, and not all hawker stores need these services. Finally, let’s call a spade a spade and recognise that the attendant charges, like a SingTel phone bill, are the result of a very lackadaisical attitude towards managing social enterprise management companies. Let us not confuse nebulous anti-competitiveness with productivity.

This article was first published on Lim Jialiang’s Facebook page and reproduced with permission.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Whiter than White?

by Ngiam Shin-Tung Alex Yam was appointed Mayor of the North West Community Development…

Singapore falls to 158 on 2020 World Press Freedom Index; categorised as "black"

Singapore has dropped 7 spots in the 2020 World Press Freedom Index…

狮城前国足球手齐聚 为筹詹时中体育基金再战球场

为响应筹募詹时中体育基金,就连过去名震球坛的前国足球员,也重披球衣再战江湖,参与本月22日举行的首届詹时中体育基金慈善盾杯球赛。 有关赛事在淡滨尼综合中心举行。虽然以二比六不敌两届国家足球联赛冠军卡尔萨协会,但是Malek Awab、Mohd Noor Ali、Tay Peng Kee、Shahri Rahim和 Steven Tan等这些名声显赫的前国足球员,在球场上向观众证明,年龄不是问题,他们在场上威风仍不减当年。 Richard Bok…

国家图书馆局前经理涉受贿近60万元

新加坡国家图书馆管理局前经理,涉嫌收取一家公司总监提供的59万5230元贿赂,在本周一(23日)被提控上庭。 被告为48岁的许雄伟,面对多达56项抵触贪污法令的控状,指控他在2005年至2009年期间,身为国家图书馆管理局前经理,受贿数百元至数万元的款项。 涉嫌行贿者为数据资料服务公司(Database Resources Services Pte Ltd)董事长刘博文,现年49岁,同样面对56项抵触贪污法令控状。 根据控状,刘博文贿赂许雄伟,以期为前者的公司与国家图书馆管理局建立生意利益。 一旦罪名成立,两名被告都可能面对五年监禁,或10万新元罚款。检控官要求两名被告以10万新元保释,惟获辩方律师求情,最终法官各人8万新元保释,二者将在下月10日再进行审前会议。