Food guru KF Seetoh from Makansutra wrote an open letter to Senior Minister of State Dr Amy Khor on Tuesday (9 Oct) imploring her to preserve Singapore’s public hawker centres. In essence, Mr Seetoh is against the government appointing a 3rd-party, the so-called “social enterprise” operator, to run publicly funded hawker centres.

In his letter, Mr Seetoh also shared more unfair practices adopted by some of the Social Enterprise Hawker Centre (SEHC) operators against hawkers. He shared snippets of the 1-sided agreement online crafted by one SEHC operator to show how ridiculous the terms are.

For example, under the agreement, the operator would have the rights to penalize a hawker if the hawker quit his stall half-way, making him pay the remaining months of rentals and fees until a new tenant, subjected to the approval of the operator, is found. The agreement also has an all-encompassing clause stating that the operator is entitled to “at any time” and “from time to time” increase stall rentals and ancillary charges. There is little the poor hawker can do once he signs the agreement.

SEHC is Jurong West Hawker Centre run by subsidiary of Koufu

On Friday (11 Oct), Todayonline reported that the SEHC involved is actually the new Jurong West Hawker Centre, run by Hawker Management Pte Ltd, a subsidiary of Koufu Group.

Koufu in fact, just went public recently in Jul this year. Koufu is founded by Mr Pang Lim (PBM), a grassroots leader at Pasir Ris-Punggol GRC. He is the Vice-Chairman of Punggol 21 CC Building Fund Committee as well as Patron of Punggol North CCC and Punggol 21 CCMC.

Other dubious tactics employed by Koufu’s subsidiary also include forcing the hawker to pay $0.20 for each tray returned by the patrons. The patrons do not need to put any deposit monies for trays used. As a result, the hawkers said sometimes they even had arguments with patrons over trays.

For example, if a patron uses three trays for three dishes that could be placed on one tray, the poor hawker has to fork out 60 cents in total on behalf of the patron. Some patrons also took advantage of this ill-conceived system to get back their money as much as possible by using more trays. One hawker told Todayonline that they had to pay Koufu’s subsidiary as high as $900 for tray charges at times.

Forced into a corner, a number of hawkers at the Jurong West Hawker Centre decided to petition the National Environment Agency (NEA) for Koufu’s subsidiary to remove the $0.20 tray-return fee.

When contacted by Todayonline, an NEA’s spokesperson reportedly say that the agency has received “feedback” from some stallholders at Jurong West Hawker Centre and that the stallholders were “aware of the charges involved before signing the (tenancy) agreement” with Hawker Management, subsidiary of Koufu.

The spokesperson added that the agency has asked Hawker Management to work with the stallholders to address any concerns on this matter and that effective tray-return systems make the cleaning of tables easier and faster, which is beneficial to both customers and stallholders.

NEA run by BG Tan Meng Dui

Currently, the Chief Executive of NEA is BG (NS) Tan Meng Dui. He was, in fact, appointed to run NEA only recently (2 Oct). He took over from RADM (NS) Ronnie Tay, the former Chief of Navy, who helmed NEA since 2013.

According to a press release from the Ministry of the Environment and Water Resources, RADM Tay “played a key role in steering the development of 20 new hawker centres, and the formulation and implementation of the Hawker 3.0 Masterplan to sustain the hawker trade, enhance the vibrancy of hawker centres and raise their productivity level”.

The new NEA CEO BG Tan was formerly a Brigadier General from the SAF. After SAF, he went on to become the Deputy Secretary (Technology) in MINDEF HQ. He was later transferred to MND as Deputy Secretary (Development).

BG Tan is said to have graduated with a Bachelor of Science (Mathematics) First Class Honours from the University of London, Imperial College of Science and Technology, UK in 1989. He subsequently obtained a Master in Public Administration from Harvard University in 2001. He was awarded the Public Administration Medal (Silver) (Military) in 2006, and the Long Service Medal (Military) in 2011.

The government deemed that with his many years of experience in the SAF, BG Tan is ready to run NEA, taking care of our public funded hawker centers, and hopefully, our hawkers too.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

谴责听证会审问异议者 加国学者声援覃炳鑫

再有国际学者跨海声援本地历史学者覃炳鑫博士,谴责新加坡国会“应对网络蓄意假消息”特选委员会,恶意打压覃博士针对新国历史的异议,严重侵害和不尊重学术自由,有必要向后者作出公开道歉。 加拿大大学讲师协会(CAUT)认可覃炳鑫博士的历史学者身份,专研上世纪5、60年代新加坡独立斗争史实。该协会以执行总监大卫罗宾逊名义,致函上述特委会主席暨新加坡国会副议长张有福,作出严正抗议。 该协会控诉,在今年3月由国会特选委员会召开的“应对网络蓄意假消息”的公开听证会,覃炳鑫遭六个小时的恶意盘问,已偏离原本要讨论的陈情书内容,实则藉此驳斥覃的历史观点和对政府的批评。 “覃炳鑫的研究已经受过同行的评议,但是在质询过程,特委会意图透过断章取义的方式,质疑覃炳鑫的历史观点。特选委员会的质询侵害了覃炳鑫的学术自由,以及在免于被当权者报复下发表其研究的权益。” 捍卫学者发表学术观点 拥有70万教职员会员的加拿大讲师协会称,该会致力捍卫学术自由,学者们传授、学习、研究和出版他们的研究或思想,应免于受任何体制或教条的规范、报复或歧视。 “覃博士受到的对待,彰显了新加坡当权者对待学界的态度,也威压国内其他学者行使他们的学术自由。” 为研究应对网路上蓄意散播的假消息,新加坡政府从2018年3月14日至29日,国会特选委员会召开公开听证会,广纳谏言,收集公民组织意见。在最后一天,却上演成律法部长沙姆甘针对覃炳鑫的审问。 然而,覃炳鑫提到1963年冷藏行动和1987年光谱逮捕行动,目的在于政治利益,而非国家安全问题,批评人民行动党和前总理李光耀,才是假新闻的散播者,引起律法部长善姆甘等人围剿。 针对上世纪50、60年代期间,新加坡是否有共产主义阴谋散布?左翼份子是否受马共唆使企图进行不利新加坡的政治活动,才有必要进行逮捕行动,覃炳鑫和善姆甘展开六小时的审问拉锯战。 质疑覃炳鑫历史观的理据 在过程中,善姆甘以“是或不是”、“同不同意”、“你有读过这些资料吗?”“对与否”等威权式的提问,无意与覃炳鑫对话,过度简化复杂的历史争议,其背后意图却是要质疑覃炳鑫历史研究的正当性和理据。…

【冠状病毒19】6月4日新增517例确诊 包括15社区病例

根据卫生部文告,截至本月4日中午12时,本地新增 517例冠状病毒19病例确诊。 新增病患大多为住宿舍工作准证持有者。今增 15例社区病例,其中两人是本地公民或永久居民,其余13人是工作准证持有者。 这些社区病例,都与早前确诊病例有关联,且属于无症状患者,当局为他们进行检测以进行确认。 本地累计确诊病例已增至3万6922例。当局仍在搜集病例详情并将在晚些时候公布。