photo: sme.org.my

According to a survey conducted in June 2018 among a sample of 3,175 Singapore residents and 3,821 Thailand residents, Milleu Insight has found that Singaporeans tend to respect orderliness more than Thais but scored lower in areas like social courtesy.

According to the survey conducted by the independent market research company, 66% of Thais said that they smile at strangers all the time – living up to the moniker “The Land of Smiles” – while only 11% of Singaporeans indicated the same. And though 40% of Singaporeans reported that they greeted their neighbours all the time, this is still significantly lower than the Thais (61%). These two indicators as well as the fact that only 33% of Singaporean drivers give way to vehicles all the time compared to Thais 54% reveals that Singaporeans do not display social courtesies quite as frequently as their Thai counterparts.

The report on the survey suggested that this could be pegged on a variety of reasons including a fear of being rejected, misunderstood, or awkwardness (in terms of greeting strangers and neighbours) or the Singapore ‘kiasu’ attitude (in terms of driving etiquette).

However, where Singapore did excel was in orderliness, something Milleu attributes to success of strict laws. Compared to Thailand, Singapore scored significantly higher on issues like littering and queuing up. For example, 45% of Singaporeans reported that they would never cut queues even when given a chance while only 21% of Thais said the same. Similarly, more than half of Singaporeans (56%) said that they would never litter compared to a mere 16% of Thais – obviously this is a testament to Singapore’s strict anti-littering penalties.

Finally, and possible quite intriguing is the section on graciousness. The survey found that Singaporean parents tend to be more gracious as compared to other non-parent Singaporeans in every category. Naturally, the report suggested that parents may feel more of a responsibility to lead by example and inculcate kindness in their children – kindness begins at home after all.

Mothers especially ranked as the most gracious group. 57% of mothers reported that they greet their neighbours all the time while 88% said that they kept the noise down at night all the time. This is significantly higher than the average Singaporean at 40% and 76% respectively. This further confirms the theory that parents, especially mothers, are the key role models for their children to learn civic mindedness from a gracious home. Children tend to do what they see, not what they’re told.

Although we still have a long way to go in building a gracious society, our civic mindedness when it comes to issues like littering and giving up our seats to others in need proves how far we have come in making an effort to care for others. Effective public initiatives should also be commended in making a difference. However, social responsibility should also start at home, as Singaporean parents have successfully demonstrated.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

推着电动滑板车走半小时 送餐员示范禁令后“正确送餐方式”

电动滑板车禁令颁布后,靠有关代步工具工作的送餐员生计大受影响。一名送餐员示范正确的送餐方式,就录制了一段视频,行走了半个小时才成功将饮料送达目的地。 一名GrabFood送餐员将自己的送餐行程,于11月11日上载到优管(Youtube)的Guide to GrabFood频道上。 在视频开端就提到目前的条规,包括在行人道上行驶将被罚款2000元、草坪上行驶罚款5000元、在沟渠盖上行驶则罚款四万元,但是他的银行户头内只有300元等,随后就开始其送餐行程。 他到淡滨尼中5路的世纪广场(Century Square)一家奶茶店,领取了顾客所点的饮料后,就朝向目的地,即淡滨尼42街第458座组屋前进。 基于所走的路线都没有公共连接道,所以这名送餐员唯有推着电板车,在人行道上行走。“如你们所见,我现在在人行道上,所以只能推着电动滑板车。这是“最合法”的送餐方式。” 一路上,他一边推着电板车,一边阅读网友们的评语。 网友的评语有赞有弹,也有提醒不能违规的事项。而他一边行走时,也分享了有关政府和送餐服务商,推出700万元以旧换新援助计划的看法。 “我真的觉得很值得,因为是提供给在职的送餐员,有1000元,而要换成脚车的也能领取600元,我觉得有多了,很不错。” 此外,他也提到自己是幸运的,因为身体健康,所以行走送订单并不是问题,但是对其他面对某些状况的送餐员而言,可能就做不到了。“一些送餐员是残缺人士、或者身体抱恙,需要电板车帮助送餐;有的则是因为教育水平不足,无法找到更好的工作,需要这份工作来支撑生活。”…

徐顺全再向穆仁理挑起“兼职议员论”

组屋消防栓被锁,要救火时水管喷不出水,对此民防部队在本月8日,向裕廊-金文泰市镇理事会,发出“消除火患隐忧通知书”(Fire Hazard Abatement Notice)。 至于武吉巴督单选区议员穆仁理,于本月15日在脸书公开致歉,指作为民选代议士,“政治上需对居民负责”( politically accountable)。“这些事件不该发生,我必须道歉。我将与我的民选与受委市镇会同仁检讨此事,并保障加强消防安全系统的可靠。” 尽管民主党秘书长徐顺全也赞扬穆仁理肯担当致歉,不过他也进一步致函负责裕廊-金文泰市镇会,包括尚达曼和穆仁理等七位国会议员,呼吁他们担起火灾灾黎的医疗费用。 与此同时,他不忘挑起在2016年武吉巴督补选,曾引起选民热议的“全职议员之争”。 徐曾指要当全职议员不聘代理 回溯2016年,徐顺全和穆仁理一同角逐武吉巴督国会议席。那个时候,徐顺全强调自己若当选将担任全职议员,并重申将亲自管理市镇理事会,不会雇用管理代理来加重成本。他也重申,将成立四人团队来负责市镇会交接事宜。 徐顺全的呼声似乎对选民颇有吸引力。为了反制徐的舆论,包括行动党重量级领袖前副总理尚达曼、文化、社区及青年部长傅海燕、前国会议长哈莉玛等,一同为穆仁理站台。 当时哈莉玛呼吁选民不要被徐顺全的“全职议员论”所蒙骗,指“关键是与民众在一起时做出多少贡献”。…

PSP voices out challenges and concerns alternative parties face for GE2020

The common concerns articulated by the Progress Singapore Party (PSP) members at…

比拉哈里指港抗争将徒劳无功 学者邝健铭:历史进程充满未知之数

本月10日,新加坡外交部前常任秘书比拉哈里(Bilahari Kausikan)发表文章,题为《香港的残酷现实:“反送中”抗争将徒劳无功》。 在文中比拉哈里分析,香港的抗争一开始就已失败,中国政府不会对统一退让,北京只有在不危及“一国”的前提下,才能容许“两制”;北京由于中美贸易战和国内课题,不会贸然采取行动, 但他不认为有任何国家会提供“反送中”示威者实质支持或声援。 再者,他也提出西方视港人在争取民主和更多权益,“或许他们要更多民主,我赞许青年抗争者的理想和勇气;但我质疑他们的理智。”他指出在英殖民时期港人只是英国“臣民”,但在一国两制下他们是中国公民,甚至比其他地方的中国公民拥有更多权益,“不能再要求更好了。” 比拉哈里认为,香港真正需要的不是民主,而是更好的施政;而驱使香港青年上街的焦虑是他们对未来失去信心,普通港民难以拥有或租用体面的房产(2018年,只有49巴仙港人拥屋) 他认为尽管北京不会大剌剌干预香港,但不认为中国政府的忍耐是无限的,而当前局势只不过加强北京方面对香港维稳的决心;但他认为尽管香港和新加坡常被视为竞争对手,但稳定和繁荣的香港更符合新加坡和本区域的长期利益。 邝健铭:比拉哈里一厢情愿 对于比拉哈里一文,香港历史、政治学者,曾负笈新加坡李光耀公共政策学院的邝健铭,在台湾《上报》和香港《立场新闻》撰文评述,总结比拉哈里的三大假设: 第一,对香港局面,中国仍然拥有绝对、不受任何挑战与制约的控制能力; 第二,基于第一点,中国执行“一国两制”治港政策之时,只重“一国”,“两制”只是幻想; 第三,香港是国际孤儿,原因之一,是英国对香港事务兴趣不大。…