photo: sme.org.my

According to a survey conducted in June 2018 among a sample of 3,175 Singapore residents and 3,821 Thailand residents, Milleu Insight has found that Singaporeans tend to respect orderliness more than Thais but scored lower in areas like social courtesy.

According to the survey conducted by the independent market research company, 66% of Thais said that they smile at strangers all the time – living up to the moniker “The Land of Smiles” – while only 11% of Singaporeans indicated the same. And though 40% of Singaporeans reported that they greeted their neighbours all the time, this is still significantly lower than the Thais (61%). These two indicators as well as the fact that only 33% of Singaporean drivers give way to vehicles all the time compared to Thais 54% reveals that Singaporeans do not display social courtesies quite as frequently as their Thai counterparts.

The report on the survey suggested that this could be pegged on a variety of reasons including a fear of being rejected, misunderstood, or awkwardness (in terms of greeting strangers and neighbours) or the Singapore ‘kiasu’ attitude (in terms of driving etiquette).

However, where Singapore did excel was in orderliness, something Milleu attributes to success of strict laws. Compared to Thailand, Singapore scored significantly higher on issues like littering and queuing up. For example, 45% of Singaporeans reported that they would never cut queues even when given a chance while only 21% of Thais said the same. Similarly, more than half of Singaporeans (56%) said that they would never litter compared to a mere 16% of Thais – obviously this is a testament to Singapore’s strict anti-littering penalties.

Finally, and possible quite intriguing is the section on graciousness. The survey found that Singaporean parents tend to be more gracious as compared to other non-parent Singaporeans in every category. Naturally, the report suggested that parents may feel more of a responsibility to lead by example and inculcate kindness in their children – kindness begins at home after all.

Mothers especially ranked as the most gracious group. 57% of mothers reported that they greet their neighbours all the time while 88% said that they kept the noise down at night all the time. This is significantly higher than the average Singaporean at 40% and 76% respectively. This further confirms the theory that parents, especially mothers, are the key role models for their children to learn civic mindedness from a gracious home. Children tend to do what they see, not what they’re told.

Although we still have a long way to go in building a gracious society, our civic mindedness when it comes to issues like littering and giving up our seats to others in need proves how far we have come in making an effort to care for others. Effective public initiatives should also be commended in making a difference. However, social responsibility should also start at home, as Singaporean parents have successfully demonstrated.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

四医生联署 呼吁全民出门戴口罩、避开聚集

本社获悉有四名医生,日前发表联署声明,呼吁全民若离开家门都要经常戴口罩,也应避免在有冷气的地方如商场或饮食中心聚集。 有关声明相信是在本月10日发布,这四名联署医生分别是:科林托马斯(Collen Thomas)、谭浩明(Tham Hoe Meng译音)、茱迪陈(译音)以及林彬彬(译音)医生。本社也成功联系上其中两位医生,也证实上述声明属实。 声明中认为,有别于2003年的SARS病毒,此次2019新冠病毒可能较难追踪,且病况轻微,一些感染者甚至不会出现任何症状,使得病毒可以神不知鬼不觉地传染他人。然而,有特定几率的病例死亡。 “体温检测似乎对于发现感染者成效不大。若他们得以与他人聚集且不戴口罩,可能每日都有人被感染而不自知。”再者,如今已知的新冠病毒死亡病例,已超过2003年的SARS病毒。 健康、感染者戴口罩形成双重保障 声明中建议所有人只要离开家都尽量戴口罩,“如果双方(健康者和感染者)都戴上口罩,可以说会比较安全,至少形成双重保障。” 不过医生们也理解如今不是每个人都买得到口罩,也建议民众可以以可清洗的布制口罩代替,缝入合适的(过滤)纸,或者围围巾包裹脸部,至少比起完全不戴口罩好。 其中一位医生科林托马斯告诉本社,目前已知47宗确诊病例,其中有7人病危,并不是一个很低的比例。“我们知道本地疫情严重程度大约是0.2、0.1,但我们仍需谨慎。” 她指出,她从医学院毕业后,也曾使用过布质口罩,故此不见得布质口罩现今无法使用。她坦言,可以理解一些人不太愿意戴口罩,因为呼吸会变得较不自然,再者此前政府也作出呼吁(即身体不适才戴)。她坦言,上述联署其中一名医生的孩子,就拒绝戴口罩,因为民众都得到这样的信息。…

疫情时禁锢三客工约40天 公司经理被罚9千元

疫情期间将三名客工禁锢在一间房内约40天,公司经理被罚款9千元。 被告彭桐兴(译音,Shaun Pang Tong Heng),日前因涉嫌于5月至6月期间,三名客工禁锢在一间房内约40天,被控三项非法禁锢控状,近日已认罪,其余控状也将会在下判时一并纳入考量。 《海峡时报》报道,三名印度籍客工,于5月12日至15日首次被禁锢,接下来则是长达五周的禁锢,从5月19日至6月26日。 至于禁锢客工的原因,被告称客工在疫情期间,曾离开住处欲到外面购买酒,而且其中一名客工也非法驾驶,于是被告将客工们视为“搞事”。而对于禁锢的行为,被告也非常懊悔。 根据庭上指出,三人被禁锢在一间干净、有厕所和无线网络的房间内,同时也会定时定点送餐和水。 尽管如此,控方认为这不构成禁锢客工的正当理由,事发当下应该选择报警处理。 非法禁锢罪一经定罪,将可被判处最高三年监禁和罚款。

Coca-Cola, PepsiCo, and Nestlé found to be worst plastic polluters worldwide in global clean-ups and brand audits

The Break Free From Plastic movement announced today (9th October) that Coca-Cola,…

38家公司非法排污被罚逾25万元 面包物语也上榜

根据公用事业局文告,从去年6月至今年五月期间,有38家公司非法排放污水到公共下水道而被罚款,罚款总额高达25万3700元。其中,知名烘培和食品制作公司面包物语(Breadtalk)也榜上有名。 根据文告,当局是在进行公共排污系统检查时,发现这些违例行为。这些违例行为包括把超标含金属或化学物质排入下水道,或者是更为严重的排放危险、有害和挥发性有机化合物(VOC),这些物质足以引发下水道起火,并影响排污水处理工作。 有18家公司因屡次犯错而被施以更严重的处罚。至于面包物语则被指在2016年6月及2017年4月,数次把含有超过限制的受管制化学工业污水排入公共下水道,结果因此被罚款1万6300元。 至于顽固屡犯者则是印刷和包装业者达成包装,则被指分别在2016年6月、2017年12月和2018年,非法排放含超过限制的受管制金属及化学污水,而被罚款1万4100元。 其他违规者还包括污水回收公司NSL Oilchem Logistics、电镀公司Metal Treatment Technology以及工程机械公司KMS Industrial,也各别被罚款1万2200元、1万1300元和1万零500元。 排放超过浓度限制金属和化学物质 NSL…