NTUC responded on ST Forum page yesterday (6 Oct), with regard to the recent controversy on its impending acquisition of Kopitiam Group. Ms Shona Tan, the Chief Brand & Communications Officer of NTUC Enterprise Cooperative, wrote on behalf of NTUC.

In her letter to ST Forum, Ms Tan said that NTUC Enterprise and its social enterprises aim to ensure that everybody has access to affordable, quality goods and services.

“This intended (Kopitiam Group) acquisition will allow us to do this (access to affordable, quality goods and services) by expanding our social footprint,” she wrote.

“Current plans include increasing the number of Rice Garden stalls islandwide where meals can cost as low as $1.50. This would allow us to reach out to more people.”

She described Rice Garden as a “social outreach programme” of NTUC Foodfare, which provides affordable as well as nutritious meals at hawker centres and coffee shops.

She did not say what will happen to stall rentals after the acquisition but only that if the acquisition materializes, NTUC hopes to “leverage each other’s strengths and, with the greater synergy, hope to provide better experiences for our stall operators, customers and employees”.

She also did not give further details with regard to NTUC’s lowly-priced $1.50 meals in her reply to ST Forum.

But she promised, “NTUC Enterprise is committed to do good and improve the lives of families in Singapore.”

Netizens incredulous over NTUC’s $1.50 meals

Understandably, many netizens were incredulous over the NTUC’s $1.50 meals mentioned by Ms Tan on the ST Forum page:

NTUC’s $1.50 meals not for everyone

In any case, online checks revealed that the $1.50 meals mentioned by Ms Tan are not for everyone.

According to the NTUC Foodfare website, its “Rice Garden” initiative is a social outreach programme started in 2009 to “provide highly affordable nutritious meals starting from as low as $1.50 to be enjoyed by our community – everyday”.

It said, “We were concerned about the impact of rising food prices on consumers especially the elderly and low income groups. As a social enterprise, we wanted to take the lead and create an alternative to help Singaporeans stretch their dollar.”

“Our chefs are inspired to create an authentic, hearty local menu providing value and dollar savings in every plate!” it added.

It turns out that NTUC’s $1.50 “2 Veg + 1 Meat” meals are only meant for individuals who are ComCare or NTUC Foodfare Privilege cardholders. In other words, the specially priced meals are only for needy Singaporeans and according to ComCare criteria, only individuals with a per capita monthly household income of $650 can qualify.

Also, not all outlets serve the $1.50 meals. The fine prints at the end of the web page mentioned some of the outlets would sell for $2 instead of $1.50, for these needy Singaporeans. This meant that the $1.50 meal did not cover “islandwide”, as what Ms Tan had described.

Furthermore, the vegetable and meat selections are “based on selected dishes only” and the needy Singaporeans can’t choose what they want. Each needy Singaporean is only entitled to one purchase per order.

Under the “Rice Garden” initiative, NTUC Foodfare also offers concessionary prices for senior citizens, students, full-time NSFs and NTUC union members. These people would pay $2 or $2.50 for a “2 Veg + 1 Meat” meal, depending on the outlets. And again, the specially-priced meals are “based on selected dishes only”.

So, what about the general public?

“We serve a selection of affordable meals at $2.70* for the general public,” NTUC Foodfare website said.

The “*” refers to some of the Foodfare outlets may be selling the meals at $3 to the general public instead.

To recap, this is the sequence of events involving the recent controversy on NTUC’s impending acquisition of Kopitiam Group:

  • NTUC announced acquisition of Kopitiam Group
  • Members of public wrote to ST Forum highlighting concerns of higher hawker food prices after the acquisition
  • NTUC wrote back to say it provides affordable meals that “can cost as low as $1.50”

It turns out that this “as low as $1.50” meals are only meant for needy Singaporeans, with many strings attached.

There is an old saying – when if something seems too good to be true, it probably is. Or to put it in another way, if one wants to “enjoy” NTUC’s $1.50 meals, make sure you are on ComCare.

 

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

“黄金标准”因客工疫情蒙尘 杨莉明告知BBC:不完美惟尽力而为

日前,人力部长杨莉明接受英国广播公司(BBC)采访,针对当前的客工宿舍疫情,坦言“我们并不完美”(we’re not perfect),但我国政府将尽力而为。 对此,流亡英国的维权律师陈华彪,直言自己还是头一次听到人民行动党部长承认自己是“不完美的”。他在脸书贴文分道,自己还必须重播再听一次,确定自己没听错。“如果天价高薪部长也是不完美的,那么他们是否在对待自己的政治对手和异议时,能更谦卑、体面些?” BBC在前日(22日)报导新加坡客工宿舍爆发的疫情,也指我国防疫从“黄金标准”的声誉,因为客工宿舍病例激增而蒙尘。 该视频报导来自客工宿舍的病例占了新加坡累计确诊的八成,也指客工们住在拥挤的环境,一些宿舍房间甚至容纳多达20人。 报导采访其中一名不愿具名客工,这名客工同室室友确诊,也不知自己是否已“中招”而不安,所有人都有风险。 不过现今新加坡政府已提供各种协助、医疗支援以及为客工进行检测。 BBC采访杨莉明,后者表示仅在东南亚就有多达千万人的外籍客工,而有好一部分就在新加坡。她坦言我国也有不完美之处,不过仍会尽力而为。 “是的,我们在客工宿舍落实社交安全距离措施,若时间能倒退,可以说这些安全距离措施需做得更多。” 截至本月23日中午12时,新加坡累计确诊已破万,达1万1178例。住在宿舍的32万3000名客工中,就有9076人染病,感染率达2.81巴仙。 至于社区中累计958名国民和永久居民确诊,属入境病例者则多达403例。…

How Minister K Shanmugam’s response obfuscates the allegations of Ridout estates

Minister for Home Affairs and Law, K Shanmugam, addressed serious allegations about residential properties by requesting an independent review. However, his response seemingly conflates various issues, potentially misrepresenting the allegations. The true concerns aren’t about illegal tree felling or car porch construction, but about whether proper procedures were followed and appropriate permissions were granted. And most importantly whether there was a potential conflict of interest leasing a property from the SLA, an entity the Minister for Law oversees.

Fundraising initiated for family who lost a son due to assault by co-workers

Alex Chua created a fund raiser to seek donations from members of public who would like to help Fazli’s family to tide over this trying period after succumbing to injuries sustained from an assault by fellow co-workers and the cause of death is said to be due to cardio respiratory failure.

Former NMP gets trashed for suggestion to extend retirement age to make CPF savings last longer

When it comes to the Central Provident Fund (CPF), it’s an issue…