As the high profile Worker’s Party (WP) lawsuit dominates the press headlines, accusations are fast and furious. Senior Counsel, Davinder Singh who acts for the Pasir Ris Town Council implied in court that the WP had in some way misused town council monies to benefit their own family and friends thereby breaching their fiduciary duties while lawyers for the WP maintained that the WP had acted within the law and in good faith. Given that this court case shines the spotlight on the duty of care that our public officers have over public monies, I would like to take this opportunity to explore all the fiduciary duties owed to the public by all elected politicians.

As the court case is on going, I will let the process run its course and not speculate on its potential outcome. Given that the Pasir Ris Town Council and the Aljunied-Hougang Town Council have made the point of emphasising the fiduciary duties that elected politicians have, I would like to ask if the government holds the same high standards for its own government departments. What about the fiduciary duties owed by SingHealth to Singaporeans who utilise their services?

Isn’t SingHealth obliged to protect the data of Singaporeans? Don’t they have a fiduciary duty to adequately safeguard our personal data? Given that they have not managed to do so, have they also failed in their fiduciary duties? If so, can the 1.5 million citizens affected similarly mount a class action lawsuit against SingHealth for its failures? It is important to note that the committee of inquiry convened to investigate this breach has already identified many gaps that can be construed as negligence on the part of IHiS and SingHealth.

What has plagued SingHealth has had far greater ramifications than the alleged misdemeanors that took place in the Pasir Ris and Aljunied-Hougang Town Councils. For one, the SingHealth breach affected far more people. If the government wants to set a high standard for fiduciary duties, they this would need to apply equally across the board. It should not be haphazardly applied only to elected opposition MPs. Will there be a panel of set up to represent the 1.5 million people who have had their data stolen?

In our digital age, personal information can be misused for countless nefarious purposes. Arguably, this is far worse than anything that is alleged to have happened at the Pasir Ris and Aljunied-Hougang Town Councils. What is the level of fiduciary duties owned by SingHealth then?

It is easy to point the finger but if SingHealth is not similarly sued, then it is a case of pot calling kettle black.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Lee Hsien Yang: "Today’s PAP is no longer the PAP of my father. It has lost its way", supports principles and values of Progress Singapore Party

Mr Lee Hsien Yang (LHY), son of late founding Prime Minister Lee…

People cannot and should not be asked to refrain from making negative comments just because there are worse things out there

There’s been a lot of talk these past few days about Israeli…

25岁国大生进厕所偷拍女学生,被控非法入侵与非礼认罪

一名25岁国大生因进入厕所偷拍两名女性,被指控非法入侵与非礼罪,被告目前已认罪。 该名国大生尤俊超(译音,Ryan You Jun Chao),据称他在今年2月11日以及3月5日,分别于早上7点15分以及凌晨2点15分,溜进女厕并偷拍两名女学生洗澡。 据国大发言人向《亚洲新闻台》透露,被告目前已被停课并延期毕业,此外,他还必须接受强制性咨商与康复治疗,同时也会将所有的制裁记录在证书上。 “我们在获悉犯罪事件发生后,立即向受害者提供支持与援助,目前已对被告下达禁止接触的指令。” 国大发言人也强调,此次非礼事件的处置比起以往的处置非礼案件时,实施更严厉的制裁。 “针对行为不端的学生,国立大学将会严正以待,不予宽恕。今年8月,本校也成立了为受害者提供的专门支援管道,提供受害者更多的支持”,发言人表示。 一经定罪,被告将可能面临三个月至一年以上监禁,或罚款1500元。被告听证会将在明年1月20日审理。 国大非礼案风波爆出,提高人们的警觉意识 自4月份,国大爆出轻判非礼加害者而引起众怒,事情由23岁国大女学生马芸(Monica…

PSP’s Kumaran Pillai shares HDB resident’s concern on spalling ceiling

The Progress Singapore Party (PSP) candidate for Kebun Baru SMC Kumaran Pillai…