It was reported in the news today (‘MOH puts a stop to foreign patient referral contracts‘, 30 Sep) that the Health Ministry (MOH) has instructed all public hospitals to terminate their contracts with foreign agents who refer foreign patients from overseas to them.

MOH said that the priority of public healthcare institutions is to serve Singaporeans’ healthcare needs. They “are not allowed to actively market themselves to foreign patients”.

Some of the public hospitals which were named in the news to have used such foreign agents include Changi General Hospital (CGH), Singapore General Hospital (SGH) and National University Hospital (NUH).

It was reported that the agents can earn a lucrative commission fee of up to as high as 8 per cent of the patient’s hospital bill. An agent’s duties include assisting potential patients with information they require before making “the most suitable recommendation”, as well as helping patients to arrange specialist appointments.

Dr Keith Goh, consultant neurosurgeon of International Neuro Associates, was surprised when he heard about such practice instituted by the public hospitals, “This practice of giving a ‘referral fee’ to ‘medical agents’ is unethical,” he told the media.

The 8 per cent commission on a hospital bill of $500,000 would be $40,000 – “which is more than the annual salary of a staff nurse”, he added.

Jakarta-based agency has been referring Indonesian patients to Singapore hospitals for 11 years

At the same time, the media also reported that one of the large foreign agencies, HCM Medika which is based in Jakarta, has been helping to send some 15,000 Indonesian patients to Singapore and Malaysia hospitals.

Indeed, its website confirms that HCM Medika is an official representative of the following hospitals in Singapore, including the public ones:

The website said, “We have an official agreement with various hospitals in Singapore and Malaysia to facilitate Indonesians going to those respective hospitals for medical treatment. Our recommendation is always based on patient’s medical need and budget.”

And according to further information on its website, PT HCM Medika was established 11 years ago in 2007 to “help Indonesians to get great quality medical care from government hospital in Singapore”. In other words, HCM Medika started its business as an agent to Singapore’s public hospitals 11 years ago.

The best part is their services are provided free-of-charge to the Indonesian patients as they get their fees from the hospitals:

Its services even include recommending doctors to Indonesian patients. It’s not known if the doctors pay any additional fees to HCM Medika for the referrals:

It also said that its staff visit Singapore and Malaysia regularly to “learn about the latest developments” and also to “meet with various doctors and hospital staff”.

“That way, we can give our customers more useful insights,” it said. “Thanks to the hard work of our staff and the continuous support from our clients, we have grown from a small operation to a well-established company with offices in Jakarta and in Bandung”.

They also provided cost estimates for some of the medical procedures:

Jakarta-based agency recommends doctors to patients

Most interestingly, HCM Medika also recommends some of the Singapore doctors on its website. It’s not known if these doctors are aware of it or have any dealings with HCM Medika directly, as advertising a doctor’s service is frowned upon in Singapore.

Singaporean patients live in tents outside CGH

It is most unfortunate that the public hospitals have been taking in foreign patients from overseas all these years when at times, they do not even have enough beds to house Singaporean patients, resulting in them lying in tents outside the hospital buildings.

Four years ago in 2014, the bed crunch situation became so bad that CGH had to pitch tents on its hospital grounds to house patients.

At the time, Dr Lee Chien Earn, CGH’s CEO confirmed with the media, “Our bed occupancy rate has crossed 100 per cent for certain periods over the past month and some patients have waited more than 24 hours for an inpatient bed.”

This was despite CGH already renting wards from other private hospitals.

Singaporean Madam Fatimah Beevi, 60, was placed in the Admission Transit Area in CGH for 48 hours while waiting for a B2 bed. “There was no shower room and I couldn’t bathe for two days,” said Madam Fatimah, who was quickly discharged from CGH after her condition “stabilised”.

When news broke out that patients had to live in tents at public hospitals, there was a big public uproar. Then, MP Chia Shi-Lu conveniently suggested that the bed crunch might be due to “the holiday season rather than a spike in illnesses”.

When questioned in Parliament after the news broke, Health Minister Gan Kim Yong said it was due to Singapore’s ageing population, which needed more hospitalization. He replied in the House that this was one of the factors that contributed to the high bed occupancy rate at public hospitals.

But what is not mentioned by the minister is that while the lower tier wards are being fully occupied but higher tier wards such as A2 and A1 are heavily used by medical tourists. Doctors and activists have for years argued that there should be no class separation of wards in the public hospitals. Class C wards are not air-conditioned even when the corridors of the public hospitals are, which some say that it is a measure by hospitals to differentiate between the subsidised and paying wards.

In any case, while Madam Fatimah lamented that she couldn’t bathe in CGH for 2 days, Indonesian Ibu Maria was very pleased with the National Cancer Centre Singapore, a public hospital under SingHealth.  She wrote to HCM Medika:

 

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Singapore’s ambassador to the United States says no “national crisis” in response to article by New York Times

Mr Ashok Kumar Mipuri, Singapore’s ambassador to the United States has issued a…

林志蔚解析最低薪金制 经济讲师要工人党先实验政策提案?

上周,工人党盛港候任议员、也是一名经济学者的林志蔚,分析政府渐进式薪金模式和最低薪金制的差异。即便最低薪金制不是毫无疑问的好政策,但却是能改善雇员处境的良好开端,近期的研究,也倾向支持最低薪资制,即时薪资涨幅很大,对于低薪工友的就业问题实则带来冲击微小。 不过,新加坡管理大学经济系高级讲师吴正晓,在《联合早报》的交流站则表示要给林志蔚“两个建议”,认为对工人党的政策如最低薪金制不能“为了同意而同意”;再者也建议若林志蔚认为工人党政策可行,如冗员保险可先在盛港市镇会试行看下效果如何。 由于目前在冠病疫情影响下,对经济和社会造成冲击,他认为林志蔚在电视辩论,却提起最低薪金制感到惊讶,因为大部分经济学家都会反对在失业率上升、经济下行之时,实行最低薪金制。 “林志蔚把视野放到疫情后” 但民众林师顺也在另一篇文章强调,大选不仅仅是为了克服此次疫情举行,也是决定国家未来五年发展由谁带领。“身为在野党一员的林博士,把视野放到冠病疫情后的新加坡,在辩论中有此发言,并不奇怪。” 他认为吴正晓似乎误解了林志蔚,为何在辩论时提出最低薪资和冗员保险等提案。 在新加坡现有的渐进式薪金模式下的低薪员工,也是重要的劳动力,给予他们一定的薪资,应超越学术经济分析,是社会应该在解决贫富差距的课题上所进行的讨论。 吴正晓是在评论中指出,最低薪金制在目前仍有争议,尽管部分经济学家赞同,但大部分都会坚决反对在失业率上升和经济下行时,提高最低薪资。 至于冗员保险,他则分析假设一名员工一生工作40年,大概只有40/280(七分之一)的机会,他能够领取到这个保险赔付。 羊毛出在羊身上。以每月4元的保费,如果想这个保险能够持续可行,那么平均每1万3428÷4=3357个月,也即大约每280年,员工可以拿到一次保险赔付。 他认为低保费,高赔付的保险产品是存在的,只是大部分顾客永远得不到赔付。 “五年以后,在下一次大选的辩论会上,在推荐新政策的时候,如果林博士可以说他们已经“实验过了”(done…

“I’ve created all these jobs…”: PM Lee

Explaining why there are more foreign professionals in Singapore, Prime Minister Lee…

新型冠状病毒:本地确诊病例再添三起

根据卫生部今晚(30日)发布的文告,新型冠状病毒本地确诊病例再添三起,三名患者皆来自中国武汉。 此前确诊病例已达到10起,这使得本地确诊病例增至13起。当局强调目前未有在社区扩散的现象。 文告指出,第11宗确诊患者为31岁的来自武汉女性,他在本月22日,与此前通报的第四宗病例患者(36岁武汉男子,曾入住悦乐圣淘沙酒店)一起抵达新加坡。她在乘机时未出现症状,不过由于与第四位确诊患者有近距离接触,所以从本月26日就被令隔离。 然而这名女子在27日出现症状,被立即送往国家传染病中心,并在昨晚11时确诊患新型冠状病毒。 第12位患者 第12位确诊患者则是37岁的来自武汉女子,在22日抵达狮城,乘机时未显现症状直至26日。本月29日,她搭德士前往陈笃生医院,被列为可疑病例并送往国家传染病中心,随后在29日晚确诊患新型冠状病毒。 在入院前上述女子曾入住悦乐圣淘沙酒店(炮兵大道10,10 Artillery Avenue)、81 Princess酒店、位于芽笼的家庭套房觀景酒店(Home Suite View…