At a lecture at the Singapore Management University (SMU), Malaysian politician Anwar Ibrahim made some rather interesting observations about leadership. When speaking about the qualities of leadership needed for the 21st century, Anwar said that “beyond leading by example, modern leaders should also demonstrate compassion and forgiveness”.

Given that this is from a man who had been incarcerated on suspected trumped up politically motivated charges, we should take note and reflect upon this simple but yet profound statement.

Compassion and forgiveness have always been seen as virtues. In our current age of social media, these values have taken on a super charged type of significance. Everything is public and everything is instant. For celebrities and other public figures (including those in power), their reputations are vulnerable to bad publicity. In days of yore, images can be carefully controlled. With the internet however, this makes it much harder. Being seen and viewed as compassionate and forgiving has therefore become more nuanced.

While Anwar took great pains to say that it is “not right” to compare Singapore and Malaysia, it is imperative to note that the qualities of compassion and forgiveness have equal relevance in Singapore as it does across the causeway. Are our leaders seen as compassionate and forgiving?

Anwar himself has been on the receiving end of both ruthlessness and forgiveness. He was thrown in jail and then pardoned. From a Singaporean perspective, has the government been forgiving to those who have challenged the authorities?

Looking at how historian Thum Pin Tjin has been publicly singled out and discredited, one would be forgiven for thinking that the authorities are unforgiving. This is but the most recent example. There lies a long string of people who have been subjected to the unforgiving nature of the authorities. Remember Roy Ngerng? How about Jolovan Wham? Let’s also not forget Chee Soon Juan or JBJ – just to name a few. Could the government have been more forgiving?

In this new age, information travels fast. Discussions are also more rapid. If the government does not get the balance right, it can very quickly find itself severely judged by the court of public opinion. Everyone is a sucker for a benign and magnanimous ruler.

Is this why the government is so keen to have a measure of control over “fake news”? Control, however is not a long term solution – not where the internet is concerned. It is an ever evolving medium. A change in values would be a more permanent way of entrenching itself. The government would do better cultivating its image and take a less aggressive and petty stance towards perceived critics.

While saying that Malaysia and Singapore are not the same, Anwar has also listed qualities that transcend both sides of the causeway.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

告《网络公民》读者书:诚挚呼吁读者们襄助

各位网络公民读者你们好: 诚如各位所知,《网络公民》最近正蒙受政府加大力度打击,对我们提出法律诉讼,或不断作出各种责难、指控,亦针对我们的员工指控相关“正当性问题”。 此外,主流媒体与当局合力诋毁我们之时,试图抹黑致力去揭露真相的我们。 然而,这只是冰山一角,即使现在的你正在阅读这篇文章,默默支持着我们,但在外头仍然有许多亲行动党的群体或网军正在企图撕裂我们。 尽管我们再怎么坚定不移,努力不懈,接下来我们仍然逃不过面对一场艰苦战役,特别是如你所见,我们拮据的财政状况(如图所示)。你可以想象一个坐拥数百万的政党与媒体,正在轰炸一家如今银行存款仅剩不到1000元的良心出版刊物,可见期间的辛酸与无奈。 因此,我们诚挚地呼吁忠实的读者与支持者,来协助我们打赢这场战役,可以对我们伸出援手,目的是让《网络公民》持续运行,并长期保持运作,直到即将来临的大选(可能是11月底或是明年的4月至5月之间)。 倘若得不到经济上的支持,我们可能会在大选前,面临支付员工的薪资与其他设备,也无法尽可能扩大我们的新闻的覆盖面(估计预算为4万元左右)。 非用于总编面对总理诉讼 再次重申,本次捐款并非用于本社总编辑许渊臣与总理的法律诉讼,而仅仅是为了来临大选的运营开销。 而群众们的善款,将用于支持本社英语和中文独立新闻网站的运营,希望能藉此继续为读者们提供独立、主流媒体忽略的报导和视野。由于今年年初曾创建马来语网站,但因资金短缺,只能被迫终止。 若想要长久支持本社,每月只需6元或每年60元,注册成为本社的订户(显然现在是没有明显好处),以支持我们在新加坡创立独立媒体,坚守中立报导的使命。 以下为本社的注册网址:www.theonlinecitizen.com/membership…

Myanmar junta puts on show of force as 11 protestors killed in crackdown

Myanmar security forces killed at least 11 protestors on Saturday, witnesses said,…