Davis Ks Ong, a local citizen had shared in a Facebook post his concern of how the well-being of elders in this country is not being taken seriously. Mr Ong proceeded to share the story of his father-in-law, Mr Ang Rong Sheng who was placed in a local nursing home on 29th July 2016.

A stroke patient with multiple conditions, Mr Ang was mobile, active and could walk with assistance. However, he needed constant care that Mr Ong’s family was not equipped to provide, which is why they decided to place him in a nursing home where they believed his needs would be met.

However, after only 20 days in the nursing home, Mr Ong and his family noticed a steady deterioration of Mr Ang’s health. In some photos that he shared, Mr Ong pointed out bed sores, muscle atrophy, and severe weight loss. When the family asked the nurses about whether he’s eating or why he looks tired, they say “he always didn’t finish his food”, or “he always like that”.

On 18th August, Mr Ang was rushed to A&E. He was non-responsive and was diagnosed as being severely dehydrated. The family was told to prepare for the worst.

Mr Ong’s family then decided to file reports against the nursing home to Ministry of Health and the police. They also wrote to KV Capital who held 100% interest in the home at the time.

The Chief Operation Officer of KV capital replied a few days later to reveal that they nursing manager has resigned (or possibly was asked to resign), the nursing staff overseeing his father-in-law Mr Ang also resigned, and that there were no records of the late Mr Ang’s food or fluid intake or output (which is a requirement).

After checking CCTV footage, the family also learned that Mr Ang was not brought out to the dining hall for at least two weeks, with the home claiming that they feed him at his bedside but there are no records to prove that.

In the end, the nursing home admitted their fault in writing and offered the family compensation in terms of paying for the hospital bill and waiving holding charges.

However, Mr Ong’s father-in-law remained non-communicative and now required full-time care. He was completely bed-bound and depended on tube feeding. His quality of life basically plummeted and stay there until his passing on 19th August 2018. The financial burden and emotional stress on the family also increased.

In his post, Mr Ong said that the police had told him that they are unable to file a criminal case, saying that there’s is only “possible negligence”. However, the MOH has yet to reply to Mr Ong about investigations into this matter, receiving only a standard response for the past two years telling him to “await further investigations”.

Quoting what the MOH investigation officer shared during his interview and statement sharing session with Mr Ong’s wife, they were told that the “piles of files” in his office were “cases from more than two years ago with pending investigations”.

Understandably, Mr Ong questioned in his post, “Does that mean that two years is not long enough to warrant a proper conclusive investigation to possible negligence that has caused a patient much suffering, indirectly (or directly) leading to his demise?”

Mr Ong criticized the reluctance of the MOH to conduct a proper, full investigation and worries that similar cases are falling through the cracks as they fail to capture the attention of authorities. “If the MOH’s objective is to ensure quality care for our aging population, this lack of accountability speaks the total opposite,” said Mr Ong.

He had also mentioned PM Lee, MOH Minister Gan Kim Yong, AIC Chief Jason Cheah, and other MOH officials Amy Khor, Lam Pin Min, Edwin Tong, Amrin Amin, in the Facebook post.

When he first posted about this matter online, the comment section was flooded with people putting the blame on his family for sending Mr Ang to a nursing home in the first place, saying that they were the ones being negligent and not taking care of their elders.

But Mr Ong explained that as they are a full working family, the only person at home is the helper and two young kids who cannot manage an aggressive male. Considering that and his father-in-law’s multiple conditions, nursing care was the best option for them. And he also reiterated that multiply members of the family visited with Mr Ang regularly at the home, which is how they noticed his deterioration.

He said, “No one would ‘dump’ parents in a home given possible circumstances. Throughout the entire journey, my wife was the main caregiver (including financially), juggling between her duties as a wife, mother, daughter and commitment to various charity causes(…)Hope comments can be kinder because you won’t know what we had gone through to get here today.”

Mr Ong and his family are only seeking closure and, for proper and just investigation findings to be shared. The family have also planned to take up a case in court with the nursing home.

The photos shared by Mr Ong would shock anyone.

Just how fast Mr Ang’s condition declined in less than a month is baffling. The fact that there are bed sores and muscle atrophy show just how terribly he was cared for. There was obviously no exercise or proper feeding done at all in the time he was placed there and the nursing home basically admitted their fault in failing to provide proper care.

MOH’s lack of response and excuses for why the investigation is taking so long is inexcusable in a society that claims to care for and respect their elders.

Feb 2016 (left pic) & July 2016 before admission to said nursing home. Able to walk, eat and move with some assistance, and speak, albeit unclear at times.

 

Taken on 17 Aug 2016 at the said nursing home a day before emergency admission to hospital. Obvious deterioration noticed day after day he was there (looked worse each time we visited), but when questioned if he’s ok or if he finished his meals, staff brushed off as “normal”, “he’s usually like that” and “always didn’t finish his food”.
Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Sea is the new benefactor of the Singapore Premier League club Lion City Sailors

Based on the press release by the Football Association of Singapore (FAS)…

No news from PM Lee one month after GE on investigation into allegations against Ivan Lim

One month has past since the 2020 General Election (GE) was held…

赞潘群勤提建设性政策 杨南强:有效社会安全网需国家资源参与

在本月的国会会议上,前进党非选区议员潘群勤在现有政府扶助措施上,再建议两项提案,希望能减轻国民面对疫情的负担。 她呼吁,应允许因疫情影响而失业的国民,能从公积金户头中借出款项,解燃眉之急。再者,探讨公积金终身入息,与通货膨胀挂钩。 政府投资公司(GIC)前首席经济师杨南强,赞扬国会在野党议员也能提出建设性的政策提案! 他解释,退休金与通货膨胀挂钩,乃是确保退休入息充足的一项重要改革,且大多数先进国家采用的标准大体一致。 随着寿命延长,大多数人退休生活可能还会延长20年,这使得退休金额入息实则比实际价值减少近半。 为了弥补这损失,公积金入息至少与两巴仙通膨值挂钩,但对于许多退休后仰赖公积金入息的人士,这意味着退休金额不足,或可能面对绝对贫穷、晚年无法满足基本需求的窘境。 更糟糕的是,好些贫困者的退休户头(RA)基本存款,少过6万元。杨南强也提醒,一些低收入者通常也难有应急的储蓄,特别是在面对此次疫情时,许多人都从事零工、不稳定的工作(如送餐员、私召车司机等)。 他认为,这些群体会更需要失业时可借款的机制,搭配基本风险共担(pooled)的失业保险制度。 要保护贫困者的公积金储蓄,例如上述失业借款机制,可限制在借三个月薪资,找到工作后再逐步还款。再者,也应了解他们经济情况,再给予补贴。而这些补贴应来自公共资源,而不仅仅是由穷人自己承担。 早在10年前,包括他本人、许荣达教授和刘浩典,都曾就此提呈给政府内部研究机构和政府接受反馈的阻止REACH,但迄今似乎都未有任何成果。 杨南强认为,有效和可持续的社会安全网,不仅仅是依靠风险分担或个体的财力资金,而且还需要适当整合国家资源。 Excellent…

尚穆根称一笑置之 惟警方需调查“蛋袭”威胁

对于早前本地一名青年在脸书留言,想效仿澳洲“鸡蛋男孩”,“蛋袭”内政暨律政部长尚穆根,对此后者在今早首次在脸书针对此事发文表达看法,认为这是年轻人的夸张言辞,但自己虽可一笑置之,警方却不能。 尚穆根说,看见一些媒体报导,有关青年Edmund Zhong因为恫言“蛋袭”他,而遭警方调查。 “当我被告知此事,我一笑置之–这是一个年轻人的浮夸言辞。”但他也表示,就算他可以忽略,警方需履行职责调查他。 然而,尚穆根却提到,自己更关注这青年的公开言行,也提及青年对麻醉品的立场。“我希望他实际上没有进一步尝试服用大麻”。 令人感到纳闷的是,青年对大麻的立场,和“蛋袭”威胁案有何直接关系?尚穆根何以从青年的一句留言,可以天马行空联想到青年的身家背景,包括对方的个人喜好? 在尚穆根的脸书,可见支持者的一面倒好评。有者认为,就算只是丢鸡蛋,警方也要严正看待,新加坡对治安不能妥协。 然而,也有一名网民也和笔者一样纳闷,在尚穆根的脸书留言道,如果尚穆根可以一笑置之,那么警方同样不必对该青年采取行动。 再者,如果青年对毒品的观点有偏颇,那应做别论,而不是两件事混为一谈。 据了解,目前Edmund Zhong正在服役。他在26日接受媒体采访时表示,强调那只是玩笑话,自己并没有恶意,也没有意图真得把“蛋袭”付诸行动。 Edmund…