In the midst of the public uproar over some of the extra exorbitant charges imposed by social enterprise operators on hawkers, Senior Minister of State for Environment and Water Resources Amy Khor said yesterday (7 Sep) that the Government will continue to observe and evaluate the alternative social enterprise hawker management model.

NEA started this management model in 2015 to let hawker centres run by third-party social enterprise operators in the hope of making hawker food more affordable to Singaporeans. The operators are supposed to be socially conscious and responsible to improve operational efficiency while ensuring affordable food for the public.

However, as revealed by Makansutra founder KF Seetoh in his recent blog, hawkers at these social enterprise hawker centres were charged with dubious extra service fees on top of their stall rental. The fear is that more hawkers will push the extra hawker food costs onto consumers, making Singaporeans’ lives already miserable to become impossible.

At present, there are 7 hawker centres run by social enterprise enterprises:

  1. Ci Yuan Hawker Centre
  2. Our Tampines Hub Hawker Centre
  3. Yishun Park Hawker Centre
  4. Jurong West Hawker Centre
  5. Bukit Panjang Hawker Centre
  6. Kampung Admiralty Hawker Centre
  7. Pasir Ris Central Hawker Centre

For example, at Pasir Ris Central Hawker Centre run by NTUC Foodfare, it was revealed that hawkers were charged a whole bunch of ancillary charges amounting to more than $2,000, a lot more than their rental:

  1. S&CC Charges – $350 per month
  2. Table Cleaning Service – $550 per month
  3. Dishwashing Service – $850 per month
  4. Rental of Cashless System – $150 per month
  5. Food Waste Recycling Management – $40 per month
  6. Concept and Marketing – $300 per month

They also have to pay and participate in the use of common crockery and cutlery at the hawker centre including yearly replacement and replenishment. In addition, they must buy gas from NTUC Foodfare’s own supplier. Unable to bear the costs, at least 10 out of the 40-odd stalls have thrown in the towel at Pasir Ris Central Hawker Centre.

Amy Khor: Managing agents must inform NEA of additional services to hawkers

Yesterday (7 Sep), while touring the ‘Our Tampines Hub Hawker Centre’ with her entourage, Dr Amy Khor told the reporters, “Indeed we are very mindful that we need to ensure that hawkers have a decent livelihood … In addition to lower rental and total operating costs, we give more weight to those who offer lower costs.”

“We also make sure that managing agents are not allowed to increase rental or operating costs over the lease period,” she added. She said that the model has only been implemented for three years, and the Government is still learning and evaluating it.

“We will continue to evaluate this alternative model, take into account suggestions and feedback on this ongoing process,” she said.

On the additional services offered by managing agents such as the coin exchange service, and the quality control service as offered by Fei Siong Food Management, she explained that they are optional. Managing agents have to inform NEA when they want to offer additional services to hawkers, she said.

However, there is a need to “give some leeway to innovation” which can enhance the management of these social enterprise hawker centres, she added.

Overall, she said that Singaporeans have benefited from the social enterprise management model which has brought about a more vibrant hawker scene and improved dining experience. But if stalls continue to close like in the case of Pasir Ris Central Hawker Centre, it will become a “ghost” hawker centre vibrant only to the spirits.

 

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

S’pore forecasts economy cuts 6%-6.5% this year, as GDP contracts lesser than initial estimates

Singapore’s economy is now expected to shrink between 6 per cent and…

警队全职国民服役人员 涉擅闯女厕偷拍面控

一名警队全职国民服役人员,被指控在今年年初,在K9警犬组单位的女厕内,偷拍女子如厕。 现年22岁的被告蔡伟聪(Jonathan Chua Wei Cong,译音),于周三(18日)面对三项与上述偷拍事件相关的指控。 据悉,有关事件于3月12日,发生在蔡厝港茂布雷路2大道小区内。 据法庭文件指出,被告当天下午约4时55分,偷偷溜到女厕内,将手机放在厕所门的隔间上方,将摄像头对准受害者,被指控侵犯他人隐私,并因为私自进入女厕,而被控擅闯女厕。 他另一方面也被指控在同一时间,在厕所内,其手机中拥有拥有淫秽电影,触犯了《电影法令》(Films Act)。 基于被告要求通过刑事法律援助计划(CLAS),申请无偿法律援助,他的案件审讯将被押后,至到1月8日。 若被告侵犯他人隐私罪名成立,他有可能面临不超过一年的监禁、或罚款、或两者兼施;若触犯《电影法》罪名成立,则有可能面临不超过六个月的监禁,或每部电影被罚款不超过500元。而擅闯女厕则可能导致被告面临不超过三个月的监禁、或和不超过1500元的罚款。 本周第四宗年轻人偷拍案…

探讨异议课程遭耶鲁-国大学院腰斩 亚菲言:异议就是说不的艺术

“如果我们就连腾出空间去倾听那些说不的人,也做不到,那么民主已死。” 据报导,耶鲁—国大学院临时取消一门名为《新加坡的异议与抵抗》的课程。有关课程将由新加坡知名剧作家亚菲言(Alfian Sa’at),与参与学生探讨本土的公民抗命模式。 有关课程原本计划在本月27日至10月5日进行,结果在开课前两周就被喊停。耶鲁—国大学院校长陈大荣教授,则在受询时向媒体解释,课程“未批判性地接触多元观点,这对于探讨围绕在异议周边的政治、社会和伦理议题,去做作妥当的学术检视是需要的”。 他续指,有关课程建议的活动和选取的讲员,也有损该校不把政党政治利益带入校园的承诺。 他也指出一些活动建议包括“可能使学生面临违法风险、或面对法律责任的元素”。 课程原本由本地剧作家亚菲言和课程经理Tan Yock Theng负责。 亚菲言对于本地时政课题向来有话直说,他著作的诗歌、剧作和短片等,也常触碰诸如政治、性别和族群等议题。 课程活动之一,包括观看独立制片人苏德祥制作“光谱行动”纪录片《1987解开阴谋》(1987: Untracing…

TOC party privatized!

Dear Readers, TOC Cassetted: Not A Political Party is no longer open…