On Sat (1 Sep), MP Seah Kian Peng commented on his Facebook page with regard to the recent meeting between Historian Thum Ping Tjin, Freelance journalist Kirsten Han, Activist Jolovan Wham and Award-winning comic artist, Sonny Liew with Malaysian Prime Minister Mahathir Mohamad.

In his post, Seah took the opportunity to also drag opposition party Singapore Democratic Party (SDP) and Function 8 founder Ms Teo Soh Lung into the fray, accusing all of them trying to bring a foreign power to intervene in Singaporean domestic politics. Neither Ms Teo nor SDP members were present at the meeting with Dr Mahathir.

Dr Thum posted a Facebook post on Monday, said that “any notion that I am a traitor to my country is ridiculous and unfounded”, and that he also believes in engaging Singapore’s northern neighbour cordially and with “mutual respect”, particularly as “Malaysia is now a beacon of hope for democracy in Southeast Asia” under the new Pakatan Harapan government.

Activist Kirsten Han, who was also present at the meeting with Dr Mahathir in Putrajaya last Thursday alongside Dr Thum, Wham and Liew, said that no one at the meeting has expressed “the belief that Singapore is a part of Malaysia”, and that Mr Seah’s allegations on the matter were “unfounded”, based on the historical facts she had cited in her blog post regarding the issue.

Ms Han has also expressed her disappointment regarding the mainstream media and PAP online social media channels’ act of sharing the “unfounded” allegation, as “triggering a torrent of accusations of treason” and even “death threats”.

She also wrote in response to Mr Seah’s comment that it is “interesting” that she would associate herself with Dr Thum, declaring that it is “a great honour and privilege to work with someone who cares so much”, adding that Mr Seah should “retract his baseless statements”.

SDP  has responded to Mr Seah’s allegation – “This is what PJ Thum and Teo Soh Lung and the SDP believe in their heart of hearts?” – by confirming that “Dr Thum and Ms Teo are not members of the SDP, thus do not speak for the party, or represent us in any way”, adding that they only came to know of Dr Thum’s meeting with Dr Mahathir “through the media”.

While SDP found Mr Seah’s allegation against the party “bewildering”, SDP believed that Mr Seah’s accusation is merely a tactic to divert Singaporeans’ attention from PAP’s controversies revolving around “ministers’ salaries, the HDB 99-year lease, and the rising cost of living”, and that the allegation was merely a “desperate” and “clumsy stunt” that will not work on the public.

In a blog post last Saturday (1 Sep), Ms Han wrote that “it’s also a little random to drag the Singapore Democratic Party into this, as Soh Lung hasn’t been a member of the party for quite some time”.

Ms Teo Soh Lung, whose name was specifically pointed out by Mr Seah in the latter’s Facebook post, has fired back against Mr Seah’s accusation that “Separately, in a comment on a TOC video post, Teo Soh Lung said that “Singapore is part of Malaya la”, saying that “MP Seah is economical in his citation of the TOC video”, which “is a live stream of a forum held in Johor Bahru on 18 August 2018 and titled “Can Singapore Do a Malaysia?”

Ms Teo retorted by rehashing PAP’s history, saying that “the PAP manifesto in 1954 sought to end colonialism and establish an independent nation state of Malaya comprising the Federation of Malaya and the Colony of Singapore.”

He also expressed his indignation against Mr Seah’s post which he perceived as a means of “instigating his supporters to attack all of us” [Dr Thum, Ms Han, Mr Wham, Mr Liew, and SDP included].

Ms Teo added that Mr Seah’s agenda was to “deliberately mis-inform the public that I am a SDP member. I am not and he knows that. The PAP has a super spy network.”

He pointed out the verbal abuse he had received online as a result of Mr Seah’s post, with people “baying for blood” and threatening him to leave the country for being “traitorous”.

Ms Teo questioned Mr Seah’s integrity as he posed the following questions:

Is this how a responsible Member of Parliament should behave? Is it right for him to incite hatred against citizens? Is a member of the Parliamentary Select Committee on Deliberate Online Falsehoods entitled to spread false information against innocent citizens? Should the Prime Minister take immediate disciplinary action against MP Seah?

Ms Teo concluded by urging MP Seah to “remove his post immediately”.

Ms Han was perplexed as to why Mr Teo’s comment was suddenly brought up, considering that he “wasn’t present at the meeting with Mahathir.”

Mr Sonny Liew responded by stating that they were all “taken by surprise to find out that Hisham [Mr Hishamuddin Rais] had sent out a press alert and that there would be an impromptu press conference after the meeting”.

He elaborated that he had only personally “agreed to proceed once we were assured that those of us (Jolovan, Kirsten and myself) who didn’t want to be part of the press conference could choose to do so – which I thought would mean that we would get to meet Dr. Mahatir in a personal, unpoliticised capacity”.

However, Mr Liew viewed the incident as “an important lesson on negotiating public discourse” and expressed his excitement about having met the Malaysian prime minister in an up-close fashion.

Following the backlash from the public, Mr Seah had issued an apology via Facebook yesterday (3 Sep) to SDP for assuming Teo was still with the party but did not clarify nor retract the other allegations made in his earlier FB post.

Wham did not think too highly of his apology. He responded to Mr Seah’s post via a Facebook comment:

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Jack Sim: COVID-19 offers the opportunity for locals to get hired in the construction industry

Since the explosion of COVID-19 cases in migrant workers’ dormitories, their existence…

Public alerted of scams requiring payments of detained goods

Singapore Customs alerted members of the public of scams where victims received correspondences…

民主党本周六推介教育转型方案

新加坡民主党将在本周六(13日)下午2时至4时,推介《为创新和平等教育:转型的议程》。 该党在文告中指出,早在1994年,民主党即提及教育分流制容易产生“自我实现预言”的反效果,即那些在“较低”源流的学生,往往会产生自我价值较低的心态。 但时至今日,教育部长王乙康才提出进入“较低”源流制度可能常常会被视作是一种耻辱,“学生产生一种心态,他们会告诉自己,‘我只是一个普通源流的学生,我最好也就是这样了。’这可以成为一种自我实现。” 而在2014年,民主党就已提出国内学前教育主要仍由私人界主导的问题;直到2017年,教育部才宣布推出由政府运营的幼儿园。 “行动党一直在跟随民主党提出的国家教育方案,以上至少其中数个例子。” 民主党表示,将在本月13日的教育方案推介上,提出更多献议,特别是现金的教育体制仍着重死记硬背和考试,但当我们进入创新世代,这些做法就不合时宜了,批判思维将越发重要。 PISA无从衡量学生应付毕业后挑战的准备程度 民主党也抨击,行动党政府总不能老是拿国际学生评估项目(PISA)来说事,因为PISA指标也无法告知我们,学生对于毕业后的准备程度去到哪。 该党指出,现有体制过于强调书面资历,反而不利于学生培养对于应付现实生活所需的知识和技能。 而在经合组织(OECD)的一项研究表明,日本高中毕业生的平均识字能力几乎和新加坡高等教育毕业生齐平。在这里,识字能力指的是有能力了解、评估、使用和利用书写文字积极参与和社会接触沟通、达成一项目的或发展个人知识和潜能。 “我们可以继续欺骗自己,相信人民行动党一再强调我国教育政策在各方面顶呱呱的论述。” “又或者我们能面对现实:人民行动党透过扼杀批判性和独立思考,继续将教育作为一种政治工具,且一再采纳民主党提出的开明和转型政策。”

4 sec gens in 5 years – NSP’s rudderless leadership raises questions

If you are the secretary general (sec-gen) of the National Solidarity Party…