Source: ST/ANN

Amendments made by the Personal Data Protection Commission (PDPC) to rules regarding National Registration Identity Cards (NRIC) will prohibit organisations from collecting, using, or disclosing their customers’ NRIC and other national identification numbers except in cases where it is required by law to do so, or if the situation necessitates full identification such as in cases of medical emergency.

In a press release yesterday (31 Aug), the PDPC announced that the new rules will be implemented to “enhance consumer protection”.

The PDPC has released advisory guidelines to “enhance consumer protection against indiscriminate and unjustified collection, use and disclosure of individuals’ NRIC numbers and retention of physical NRICs”.

The same guidelines will apply to “Birth Certificate numbers, Foreign Identity Numbers and Work Permit numbers”.

Customers can now choose to not provide their national identification upon purchasing movie tickets online, when signing up for retail membership, upon redemption of free parking, and even when entering secured buildings such as condominiums, where they can provide their partial NRIC numbers, up to the last three digits and checksum, and even so, organisations are required to comply with the Act’s Data Protection Provisions, in that the data must be reasonably secured and remain undisclosed.

PDPC suggested using alternative identifiers such as user-generated IDs, tracking numbers or organisation-issued QR codes.

In most cases, consumers may instead provide mobile phone numbers, email addresses, or other forms of identification.

However, the public sector is exempt from the new guidelines.

Situations in which the failure to properly identify an individual might result in significant harm, such as entering the premises of preschools and critical infrastructure buildings, are also exempt from the new guidelines.

To illustrate, members of the public are required to provide their national identification upon checking into a hotel, subscribing to a telephone line, attending a doctor’s appointment, and upon being hired at a new workplace.

Organisations that have collected NRIC numbers are urged to re-evaluate their need to continue storing the numbers. Should they not find any need to do so, organisations should dispose of the information responsibly and in line with disposal methods outlined by PDPC.

Should organisations choose to keep the national identification numbers in their records, they must take precautions to ensure there is sufficient protection of the data, and are even encouraged to anonymise the data.

The PDPC has issued a Technical Guide to complement the NRIC Advisory Guidelines, which will provide organisations with methods to replace national identification with other identifiers in their websites and other public frontline computer systems.

Organisations that fail to abide by the new guidelines by the stipulated date of enforcement will be deemed to have breached the Personal Data Protection Act (PDPA) and may be subjected to penalties as laid out in the Act, which may include a fine of up to S$1 million.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

三肃毒局官员涉偷换尿液样本 被控妨碍司法公正

三名肃毒局官员涉嫌帮瘾君子偷换尿液样本,更利用其中一名官员的“干净”的尿液将其调换,今日(18日)三人被控妨碍司法公正。 据贪污调查局表示,该三名官员为43岁中央肃毒局上士长亚都拉曼(Abdul Rahman)、41岁上士长莫哈默哈菲兹(Mohamed Hafiz),以及31岁警曹莫哈默祖哈里(Muhammad Zuhairi)。三人涉嫌于兀兰检查站中将毒犯孟茂敏(译音,Maung Moe Min)的尿液样本偷天换日,换上哈菲兹“干净”的尿液样本,协助毒犯度过尿液测试。 肃毒局亦发表文告,证实有三名官员涉嫌偷换尿液,并表示在得知此事后,立即通报贪污调查局,全权配合贪污调查局的调查程序。 对此,肃毒局表示官员涉嫌偷换尿液是项严重的犯罪行为,必须严正以待,因而不会轻易宽容任何官员不当的行为。 案件今早过堂,将于下个月14日举行审前会议。而对于嫌犯,亚都拉曼表明不认罪,另两名嫌犯则未有任何表态。目前三人获准以一万元保释在外。 一旦罪成,被告将可能被判处七年监禁或罚款,或两者兼施。 三名被告涉嫌知法犯法,自今年7月起被中央肃毒局停职。

骗子冒充民航局 假订货骗合作商资料

假新加坡民航局人员发邮件给合作商,谎称有订单,从中骗取受害者资料。 民航局在脸书上帖文指出,当局意识到有不法分子假扮成当局工作人员,向供应商发送电子邮件,要求对方直接报价特定商品和服务,甚至发出假的确认邮件和购买订单。 当局表示所发出的电子邮件,使用加入了民航局英文缩写(CAAS)的电邮地址,以便误导供应商,借此来征询收件人的个人资料。 民航局认真看待此事,并且已经报警。 当局促请生意伙伴和民众在接获CAAS官方邮件(@caas.gov.sg)等类似可疑邮件时,提高警惕,并且切勿随意分享个人或业务资料。“若有民众面对类似可疑邮件,请直接忽略,如有必要也可直接报警。”

总理代表律师申请撤销梁实轩反诉

针对时评人梁实轩反告总理李显龙滥用司法程序,总理代表律师选择向法庭申请撤销前者的反诉。 梁实轩是在今日于脸书公布诉讼进展。他表示他也会提出申请,以滥用司法程序为由,要求撤销总理对他的提控。 总理新闻秘书张俪霖称,总理律师申请撤销梁实轩反诉的理由,是因为后者的反诉“既没有法律依据,也没胜诉希望”。 随着总理选择不回应梁实轩反告,梁也有意要求上诉庭重新审视,总理诉讼是否涉及滥用程序。 只因分享一则脸书贴文,梁实轩于去年11月遭总理提告诽谤,指出梁分享的贴文内容毫无根据,诋毁总理人格和声誉。 有关文章指《砂拉越报告》主编克莱尔,在接受访谈时指出在一马公司弊案中,新加坡和瑞士及美国,成了调查对象。但较后《砂》已澄清有关文章内容不实,要求STR纠正。 然而,梁实轩当时纯粹分享贴文,也未留下任何个人评述和留言。他已遵循资媒局指示撤下了贴文,但还是被总理以法律诉讼对付。 对于总理的提告,梁实轩也由代表律师林鼎,在上月底反诉总理滥用法庭程序,并向总理索讨“名誉损害”的赔偿。

职总平价推出”流动超市” 方便五社区年长者购物

职总平价宣布,从今日(23日)起将在本地五个社区提供“流动超市”(FairPrice On Wheels)服务,方便年长者无需离开社区太远就能买到必需品。 根据职总平价今日发布的贴文,流动超市将在每日早上9时至2时提供服务,售卖的商品包括米、食油、蔬果、罐头食品、盥洗用品、面包等必需品。 该服务涵盖的区域包括联邦连路、直落布兰雅弯、直落布兰雅坡、甘榜格南民众俱乐部和惹兰固哥(Jalan Kukoh)一带。