By now you’ve heard about the man who was filmed walking away from a taxi driver after vomiting in the cab. In the video, the taxi driver can be heard taunting the man and demanding to be paid only to eventually have S$10 thrown at him by the drunk passenger.

This incident which took place in the early morning of Saturday, 28 July then took a turn when the passenger lodged a police report later in the day against that same taxi driver. A photograph of the first page of the report has been making its rounds on social media.

In the report, the passenger detailed his recollection of the incident stating that he was put in the taxi by his friends after having too much to drink. At about 5 minutes away from his house, however, the taxi driver asked him to get out of the cab when he started feeling nauseous.

Report filed by passenger and his account on Facebook (Images from Alex Sim/Facebook)

The report and an account of the incident was posted on the passenger’s own profile which has since been removed. But even before his profile was taken down, the passenger received quite a lot of flack for making the police report in the first place with people saying that he was still guilty of fare evasion (the S$10 that he threw at the taxi driver was apparently not enough to cover the actual fare) and being rude to the taxi driver. There were many who took the side of the taxi driver:

Although the passenger has been receiving a lot of criticism from the public for his behaviour, he has also been receiving some support from the public who disagree with the way the taxi driver handled the situation. Specifically, people pointed out that the driver failed to drop the passenger off at his destination and that the whole act of filming the passenger while hurling insults and taunting him isn’t exactly innocent behaviour on the part of the driver.

According to the Land Transport Authority website, a taxi driver is not allowed to:

  1. Refuse to convey passengers without valid reason, when the taxi rooftop is displaying the “Taxi” sign. Taxi drivers must display the appropriate sign at the taxi rooftop, such as “Busy” or “Changing Shift” if he is not able to pick up passengers.
  2. Terminate the hiring of a taxi or require passengers to leave the taxi, without valid reason, before the passengers are conveyed to the destination.
  3. Overcharge passengers or solicit for passengers.
  4. Verbally insult, intimidate or harass passengers.

On observation of the video, the taxi driver definitely did #2 and #4. So I think it’s fair to say that both parties have behaved rather poorly in this situation. You could argue that ‘valid reason’ would include vomit but based on the video and the report, it doesn’t seem like the passenger actually vomited. In which case, I’d say ‘possible vomiting’ is not a legitimate reason.

Anyway, whether or not it’s one or both party’s fault in the court of public opinion remains debatable.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Corridor-reared bunny dies after severe neglect, AVA concludes it has been cared for since food has been given and cage cleaned

A Hougang resident alerted local rabbit rescue group Bunny Wonderland to a…

PM, before his National Day Rally

By Bertha Henson – Public engagement must include the coffeeshop crowd. So…

香港茶餐厅业者被指在狮城办集会,遭警方扣押护照

香港“华记茶餐厅”业者杨官华,涉嫌在我国无准证聚会谈修例风波,恐构成非法集会罪名,护照遭扣押,至今无法离境。 杨官华自修例风波以来,频繁发布相关评论视频而逐渐成为网红,他目前在东京与大阪开设港式茶餐厅,同时也是知名Youtube频道“华记正能量(Alex Yeung channel)”的版主。 11月4日,杨官华上载了一段Youtube 视频,声称他于10月10日到新加坡开发生意商机时,却遭指在我国公开谈论他国政治。据悉,他曾在新加坡滨海湾一带的一家餐厅举行闲聊聚会,让新加坡民众发表目前香港政治的局势与意见。 此举却引来网民的怀疑,指控他在未经申请,公开谈论他国政治,属违法行为。 然而,在他广邀大家参加聚会后,杨官华突然在网上沉寂了一段时间,当时网民纷纷猜测他是否因此而被捕入狱。 直至本周一(4日),杨官华再度现身社交媒体中,表示目前仍在新加坡接受调查,而他直指可能会入狱。 他声称,原本只是计划在新加坡投资餐厅与置产,但却因为在考察期间与人合照,却遭对方暗中报警指他违反狮城法令,因此才会被警方调查。 他也表示,目前护照已被扣押,而且直指是被“反对派”的人陷害,但他表示自己也会尊重我国法律与警察,并向网民强调,千万不要将事情政治化,相信一切会水落石出。 根据《公共秩序法案》,户外的公众游行与集会需要警察许可,否则即属违法。警方也提醒不会批准任何涉宣扬他国/区域政治目的的集会,呼吁游客应遵守我国法律。…

The “YouTube style of politics” in S’pore?

Is S’pore ready for the “Youtube style of politics”, as mentioned by MCYS minister Vivian Balakrishnan? Is the government ready to allow multimedia to be used for political or election campaigning?