(Photo: Facebook / Singapore Democratic Party)

In an interview given by Singapore Democratic Party’s (SDP) Dr Tambyah to Channel News Asia (CNA), he made a few points that I thought were succinct, spot on and well put. It really resonated with me and it is my hope that one day, he will become an elected Member of Parliament (MP). Not only does he have the intellect and passion, he is also, in my opinion, a calm and steadying figure that will be a wonderful check and balance for our government.

In his interview with CNA, the good doctor said “But one of the things I realised is that there are limits to what civil society can do. Civil society can give feedback but ultimately, all the levers are still with the Government. If you really want to effect change, in fact, former prime minister Goh Chok Tong said that you have to join a political party.” He was quick to add that although doesn’t entirely agree with this argument he has accepted “that’s the way it is in Singapore”.

These sentiments resonated with me on many levels. Firstly, what struck me was that he wasn’t trying to attack the system which at this point is counterproductive. Singaporeans hate conflict within government ranks as this somehow upsets the order in which we have subconsciously become accustomed to. Secondly, criticising the system overtly will arguably give the government the opportunity to “go to town on you”. Isn’t that what happened to Dr. Chee Soon Juan? This measured answer has permitted Dr. Tambyah to air his opinion while also to state his commitment to effect change. By signifying his desire to change things while playing largely within the rules of engagement, Dr Tambyah has given himself the opportunity to be in the game long term. This shows maturity and long-term thinking.

For the avoidance of doubt, I am not suggesting that I think it is wrong for opposition politicians to be firebrand. All I am saying is that we are where we are. The PAP government has indicated that it is sensitive to forceful criticism and as it stands, they are the peoples’ choice. So, we have to respect where we are and try and effect change from within the system.

Dr Tambyah is also correct in pointing out that the Singapore government and by extension the people of Singapore likes to put people and subject matters neatly into boxes. If you are a priest, you can only minister to the spiritual and prayer needs of your flock. If you are a social worker, you can organise soup kitchens, if you are a doctor, you can treat patients and so on. It is not a system that can acknowledge that all of these roles can mix and merge. It cannot accept that a doctor may also want to lobby to change laws to make things easier for his patients and so on and so forth. It is a system that views people through very narrow constraints. I am not saying that I agree with this but it is what it is and in order to reach a position where you are able to change things, you will have to choose your battles. Can this rigid system change? Yes, probably. Does the current government want it to change? Well, that’s another matter.

Perhaps this is a way for the government to control its people so as to enable it to stay in power.

However, in order to survive so as to make a difference, Dr Tambyah has correctly identified the issues and for that, I give him credit.

He is also accurate (in my opinion) to suggest that the PAP politicians come across as bullies when they try and silence opposition politicians by sheer power of numbers and ridicule. They, after all, have greater access to the relevant information and it would be easier for them to take down opposition MPs who may not have the benefit of that access. Perhaps the PAP MPs are unaware that they come across as such but they should take heed because there will always be sympathy points for the underdog. We want MPs who will dare to ask questions and not just accept the status quo. It is through questions that the public learns something new and we need someone who will dare to ask. As my lecturer always said, “there is no such thing as a stupid question”.

We do need more opposition MPs and I hope that one day Dr Tambyah will be one.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

【冠状病毒19】8月28日 94例新增确诊病例 10例入境病例

根据卫生部文告,截至本月28日中午12时,本地新增94例冠病19确诊,10例入境病例,四例社区病例,均为本地公民或永久居民 本地累计确诊已增至5万6666例。 其余80例新增病例为住在宿舍的客工,当中有58名是已经被隔离的双溪登加客工宿舍(Sungei Tengah Lodge)住户。他们大多数都是在隔离期间接受检测,或是通过例行检测发现的。 目前被隔离的4500名双溪登加客工宿舍住户已有大约3千人完成检测。 入境病例在入境我国后履行居家通知。 当局表示,未来数日内的新增宿舍病例数字仍会偏高,直到被隔离的客工都完成检测。 当局正在搜集新病例的详情,并会在今晚提供更多细节。

China approves plan to veto Hong Kong election candidates

China’s rubber-stamp parliament voted Thursday for changes to Hong Kong’s electoral system…

SAJC student's blog causes controversy

This year’s Pre-University Seminar (PUS) was held on 28 May – 1 June,…

RWS can impact youths by admitting mistake – Anti-dolphin hunt activist Ric O’ Barry

~by: Howard Lee~ Ric O’Barry, marine mammal specialist and the man behind…