Education Minister Ong Ye Kung

In a written response to a Parliamentary question filed by Non-Constituency MP Leon Perera in Parliament today (9 Jul), Education Minister Ong Ye Kung now says that the parking fees imposed on teachers will be retained by the schools.

He also revealed that an estimated S$8 million to S$10 million of parking fees could be collected annually from the teachers from the 360 primary schools, secondary schools and junior colleges in Singapore.

The latest announcement by Minister Ong appears to be a conciliatory reaction from the overwhelming negative public response towards charging teachers for parking.

Starting from August, all teachers will have to pay a monthly parking fee of S$75 for an uncovered lot and S$100 for a sheltered lot for parking their cars in schools. During the school holidays, the rate is lowered to S$15 and S$20 for an uncovered lot and sheltered lot, respectively.

For motorcycles, the monthly season parking rate during the school term is S$13 for an uncovered lot and S$14 for a sheltered lot. During the school holidays, the rates for uncovered and sheltered lots are S$2 and S$3 respectively.

The review of the carpark fees was conducted by the Ministry of Education in 2016, following the Auditor-General Office’s 2015 annual report which found three education institutions did not impose charges or imposed below market rate charges for use of their car pars. The office noted that such practices are tantamount to providing hidden subsidises for vehicle parking and not in line with the requirement laid down in the Government Instruction Manuals. The three institutions are; Institute of Technical Education, Singapore Polytechnic and Temasek Polytechnic.

It’s not known what the schools will do with the parking fees collected from the teachers.

In a Facebook post, the Workers’ Party’s Pritam Singh had said that he is against charging teachers for parking fees.

“Some public sector professions and services – and I count teachers among them – must always be seen in an elected government’s eye through a lens that recognises their direct and indirect contributions to nation-building,” he said.

Meanwhile, it has been reported that MPs only pay $365 a year or $1 a day parking at HDB carparks in the course of doing their constituency work.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

余振忠反讽王瑞杰未来五至10年走向 包括最迟2025年上调消费税

副总理兼财政部长王瑞杰,本周一宣称来届选举不仅是决定未来三至六个月,甚至是未来五到十年的走向。 对此,工人党前非选区议员余振忠不忘揶揄,提醒大家未来五到10年,民众预计会看到: 即使2021年不调消费税,最迟也要在2025年上调。 人口预计到2030年,或增至650万至690万人。 新一代公路电子收费系统(ERP)启用 至于王瑞杰称,在政党政治和选举之外,也呼吁国人要聚焦如何团结一致,共克时艰。 余振忠直言自己也这么希望,但即时从政前,作为普通公民,眼见包括选区划分杰利蝾螈(gerrymandering)、集选区制度等现象,都一再使他对支持执政党不敢恭维。2017年总统选举也让国人失望。 若你要新加坡人都同心同力,就不应只是在对行动党有利的时候。他也希望未来五到10年,能看到我国在朝向更建设性政治体制有更大的进步。

Malaysia’s “balanced growth” better than Singapore’s “higher growth”? (Part 1)

by Leong Sze Hian Malaysia’s former prime minister, Tun Dr Mahathir said…

儿童与青少年(修正)法案三读通过 将分阶段实施儿童与青少年保护

《儿童与青少年(修正)法案》已经三读通过,明年起会先扩大对儿童保护的部分,而青少年保护则有待处理。 社会及家庭发展部长李智陞昨天(4日)指出,社区伙伴在照顾儿童与青少年肩负更大的责任,而分阶段实施是为了让伙伴们能有更多时间增进落实相关方面的能力。 据现有法案,儿童与青少年受保护的年龄上限是16岁。法案生效后,其上限将提高至18岁,意味着未来个案数量将有所增加,且16至18岁青少年的需求与风险也将会不同。 李智陞指出“青少年犯罪的原因非常复杂,可能是因为来自家庭环境的挑战、负面印象或缺乏家庭支持,如今16岁以上的孩子一旦犯罪就必须接受来自社区法庭的裁判,如同成人一般,但调查显示,这些青少年却还未有完善的认知能力。” 因此,此次调整将会把18岁以下的青少年犯罪者纳入少年庭审讯,除非涉及更严重的指控。 此外,李智陞指出关于扩大儿童保护的部分将于 2020年开始实施,因为青少年收容所需要改进其安全性与保护措施,包括改造符合青少年年龄的设施、修订学业课程与就业培训计划。 另外,李智陞在回应关于强化关怀与保护令将儿童和青少年带走,是否会影响父母的角色和地位时强调,法案的宗旨是协助儿童与青少年在确保安全的环境下,离开国家保护机构,回到家庭中。 因此,在申请强化关怀与保护令前,社会及家庭发展部与社区伙伴必须先实行一系列的评估及措施,试图让孩子与其家庭能够破镜重圆。 李智陞补充,一旦孩子带离家庭,将会透过寄养方式让受暴或疏忽照顾儿童得到很好的安置,当局的目标是将三分之二的问题家庭孩子住到寄养家庭中,但现实是只有47巴仙的孩子能获得安置。 他说 “现实情况是,我们没有那么多寄养父母来照料需要得到保护的孩童。”

'I could have died that night' – Expat assault victims tell all

~by: Jewel Philemon~ “All of these things are common sense. What really…