Dr Balakrishnan at Parliament speaking about the water agreement

In Parliament today (9 Jul), Foreign Minister Vivian Balakrishnan said he expects Malaysia to fully honour the terms of the 1962 Water Agreement, including the price of water, signed between Singapore and Malaysia.

“The 1962 Water Agreement was guaranteed by both Singapore and Malaysia in the 1965 Separation Agreement, which in turn was registered with the United Nations,” he said.

Tying the 1962 Water Agreement to the 1965 Separation Agreement signed between both countries, Minister Balakrishnan added, “Any breach of the 1962 Water Agreement would call into question the Separation Agreement, which is the basis for Singapore’s very existence as an independent sovereign state.”

Water has been in the spotlight in recent weeks after Dr Mahathir said in an interview with Bloomberg last month that the 1962 water supply deal with Singapore was “too costly” for Malaysia and that he wanted to talk to Singapore about it.

“We will sit down and talk with them, like civilized people,” Dr Mahathir told Bloomberg.

The water agreement allows Singapore to draw up to 250 million gallons of raw water from Johor daily at three sen (1.01 Singapore cents) per 1,000 gallons.

Vivian: Malaysia benefited from water pricing arrangement

In Parliament, Minister Balakrishnan noted that Singapore has already stated its position on the water issue comprehensively.

“The core issue is ‘not how much we pay, but how any price revision is decided upon’,” he said. “Neither Malaysia nor Singapore can unilaterally change the terms of this agreement between our two countries.”

He also added that Malaysia has previously acknowledged that they themselves have benefited from the pricing arrangement under the deal.

Johor currently buys treated water from Singapore at 50 sen per 1,000 gallons, as provided for under the 1962 Water Agreement. This is a fraction of the cost to Singapore of treating the water, he further noted.

“Hence, in 2002, then-PM Dr Mahathir said that Malaysia did not ask for a review when it was due as Malaysia knew that any revision would also affect the price of treated water sold by Singapore to Malaysia.”

According to a MFA media release on its website, it costs Singapore RM2.40 to treat every 1,000 gallons of water. By selling the treated water to Malaysia at 50 sen or 21% of cost, Singapore is providing a subsidy of RM1.90 per 1,000 gallons to Malaysia. Everyday, Singapore is providing a water subsidy of RM70,000 to Malaysia, it said.

Singaporean households charged at least 672% more for treated water from PUB

Meanwhile, Singapore’s water prices were raised earlier this month (1 Jul). The new water tariff which Singapore households now have to pay is:

  • S$1.21 per cubic meter, for consumption below 40 cubic meter per month
  • S$1.42 per cubic meter, for consumption exceeding 40 cubic meter per month

This does not include the Water Conservation Tax or the Waterborne Fee. If both are included, the total water price would be:

  • S$2.74 per cubic meter, for consumption below 40 cubic meter per month
  • S$3.69 per cubic meter, for consumption exceeding 40 cubic meter per month

Since MFA said that it costs Singapore RM2.40 or S$0.81 to treat every 1,000 gallons (4.55 cubic meter) of water, that means it costs Singapore S$0.178 to treat every cubic meter of water. Including the cost of buying water from Malaysia at 3 sen per 1000 gallons or S$0.0022 per cubic meter, the total cost to Singapore for 1 cubic meter of treated water would be $0.178+$0.0022 or S$0.18.

To summarize, PUB buys water from Malaysia at S$0.0022 per cubic meter and spends another S$0.178 per cubic meter to treat it, giving a total cost of S$0.18 per cubic meter. It then in turn, sells to Singaporean households at S$1.21 per cubic meter (using the above $1.21 rate and excluding Water Conservation Tax and the Waterborne Fee). This translate to at least 672% more Singaporean households have to pay for the treated water from PUB. And if we use the S$2.74 rate which is inclusive of taxes, Singaporean households end up paying 1,522% more.

So, can PUB give Singaporeans a breakdown how consumers are being charged 672% more after buying water at 3 sen from Malaysia and treating it at RM2.40 per 1,000 gallons?

Furthermore, can PUB also explain the S$1.1 billion profits it gained in the last 7 years, as noted by financial blogger Leong Sze Hian?


Editor’s note – It would help a lot to explain to the citizens on the cost to treat water via the Newater or desalination process. However, PUB chooses to lump everything together and justify the increase of water by simply referring to the investments made by the government on water treatment. Based on past figures, it seems that the government will eventually be profiting from the sale of utilities even though the upfront investment is high.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

NUS leadership will have a town hall with students to discuss review committee and policies on sexual harassment

NUS Dean of Students Assoc Prof Peter Pang has announced that a…

园艺疗法助改善失智症

职总保健合作社在裕廊西开设的疗养院,正发展具治疗用途的空中花园,让接受治疗的年长者透过接触草木花色和天然环境,加强五官锻炼和复健。 根据英文媒体《新报》报导,这将是国内首个在国家公园局协助下,成立附设疗养花园的疗养院。 报导指有关花园设计纳入科学原理,透过与大自然互动,改善访客和疗养院住户的心理和社交心理健康。 国家公园局是在去年,出台针对失智症病患和年长者的治疗用途园景设计。对于哪些植物适合治疗用、花园设施、布局、标识牌等,都有考究。 例如在这座职总疗养院的花园,善用网格棚架引导住户游览。 在园内的植物之间,还设有竹制的乐器,旨在刺激住户的听觉,透过创作音乐也能提高他们的运动和协调能力。 与植物互动的疗程 职总保健合作社首要职业治疗师Benjamin Lim指出,疗养院住户也参与一些治疗课程,如制作香包或播种植物。他指出,参与课程的病患在运动、感官和认知技能方面都有改善。 根据国家公园局和新加坡杨潞龄医学系合作发表的研究报告,显示参与园艺或带年长者到公园散步,有助改善他们的心理健康和增加幸福感。 报告也发现,参与有人指导、跟花草有关的群组活动,有助减低血液中的一种成分,这种成分与炎症性的疾病有关,如忧郁症、失智症和癌症;同时,有助维持脑内另一成分的新陈代谢。 主要研究学者、国立大学助理教授Roger…

灌输焦虑和恐惧 梁文辉吁打造更强大公民,而不是更强大的政府

取自前进党助理秘书长梁文辉个人专页: 总理在昨日(7日)晚间7点半的讲话,听起来像是在要求人民给予政府更大的授权。新加坡前进党坚信,以我们自独立以来多年积累下来的实力,新加坡将最终能克服冠状危机。 但是鉴于迄今为止政府应对冠状危机的表现不佳,能够多快控制局面,度过难关是一个疑问。 这场危机与我们过去经历的任何危机都不一样,因为它不仅需要财政资源来支持经济,而且还需要新加坡人调整其生活方式和转变其经济模式。不幸的是,我们的政府在这两个方面都表现不好。除了灌输焦虑和恐惧之外,政府从不帮助新加坡人制定长期财务计划和在工作与生活之间取得平衡。它还在研发和培育能力上花费了数十亿美元,但仍然无法转变经济。 在我们进入了危机时,其实我们已经历了二十年的经济管理失误,新加坡人的生活因失去PMET(专业人士、经理、执行员与技师)工作,新毕业生的工作和技能不匹配,持续高昂的租金和其他生活成本而变得非常紧张。尤其是低收入的新加坡人,在危机袭来时因为积蓄很少,更本没有危机应付能力。在这种情况下,政府近1000亿美元救助资金在时间和数量上是远远不够的。 我们需要采取更果断的行动,以建立更强大的公民和经济。政府过去的经济政策以及过去几个月对冠状危机的处理表现证明,政府需要帮助,才能寻得更好的解决方案来克服未来十年的挑战。 加强政府的授权将无济于事,因为它在过去的60年中在国会中一直占有超级大多数。 让一个由人民行动党领导和相当人数的非行动党议员组成的国家振兴政府 (National Resurgence Government, NRG)将是一个更好的选择。理由如下:…

GE2020 marked by several police reports filed during the campaign period

GE2020 was marked this time around with a number of police reports…