Promotion material for Moments of Life (Families) app

At an awards ceremony attended by over 900 attendees organised to recognise individuals and agencies for achievements in fields such as service delivery, innovation and best practices, Minister-in charge of the Public Services, Mr Chan Chun Sing praised The Moments of Life (Families) app.

In praising this app, Chan said that this app showed that public servants were “putting themselves in the shoes of the people” they served.

The Moments of Life (Families) app facilitates parents in the performing of various functions relating to their children such as birth registrations, applications for the Baby Bonus scheme, searching for pre-schools and viewing a child’s immunisation records. While this certainly makes things much more streamlined and efficient, I wonder if it necessarily means that public servants are putting themselves in the shoes of the common folk?

Surely putting yourselves in the shoes of someone would mean understanding their struggles and not just making processes more user-friendly? The app may provide the hardware for ease of accessibility to public services but does it equate to the required mindset to truly understand the needs of the people they serve?

If the public servants administering this app do not widen their scope of thinking, I am not sure that the launch of a new app will suddenly revolutionise the quality of our public services?

It is not as if the scope of help or services is widening. It is simply that the process is streamlined?  I am not sure that Chan understands what “putting themselves in the shoes of the people” really means?

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

How should citizens rate the performance of the Multi-ministry Task Force so far?

by Cheang Kok Ming Has the Multi-ministry Task Force succeeded in its…

Compulsory counselling needed for women considering single motherhood through export of frozen eggs

Dr. Alexis Heng Boon Chin highlights concerns surrounding the extension of the age limit for elective egg freezing and the restrictions placed on single women seeking fertility treatment in Singapore. He suggests that legal loopholes allow women to export their frozen eggs for donor sperm IVF abroad. However, he emphasizes the need for compulsory counseling to ensure women fully understand the implications of pursuing single motherhood through this method, including potential legal discrimination, mishaps associated with foreign sperm banks, reduced IVF success rates, and challenges faced by mixed-race donor-conceived children.

Chief Justice says “corrective systems in place” but appeals process is not the silver bullet to an imperfect system

In his speech to mark the opening of the legal year, Chief…

Looking back at history of how our values evolved on foreign workforce

In 1997, former Primer Minister Goh Chok Tong made his national day…