Photo from Edwin Tong’s Facebook page

In the long interview with Channel News Asia which was published today (1 Jul), new Senior Minister of State for Law and Health said that the overall public trust in the PAP Government has remained healthy.

Mr Edwin Tong said, “A lot more effort has gone into revamping our feedback mechanism. Every single one of the MPs must know the ground well enough so that we don’t only end up knowing around elections that there’s unhappiness about this policy or that policy,”

He said he does make an effort to recruit and hear from grassroots leaders of diverse backgrounds who are willing to give MPs an honest picture of ground sentiment.

“Going by what I see on the ground, I think people appreciate that the Government spends time addressing the unhappiness, whether it is in terms of social transfers or immigration policies. I think that has made a difference over the years.”

He admits the transport system has been “a constant bane” but it’ll be sorted out with time.

“As with all functioning and mature democracies, the trust level ebbs and flows on different issues. But I think the overall trust in the Government has remained healthy. It’s a gut feel I have while internalising everything that I see, everything that I hear, talking to people within or outside of my constituency,” he said.

CareShield Life

He concedes that on specific issues “more could be done” in terms of communication. CareShield Life is one example.

“CareShield Life for example is meant as a good policy but people are asking if we’re making money out of it. The Government could afford to explain why we’re doing it and to allay such concerns,” he said.

“We’ll see all that come to light when we debate the issue in Parliament but I do think more could be done to bring home the key messages in a way that the average Singaporean can better appreciate.”

CareShield Life is another mandatory insurance scheme hatched by the PAP government requiring Singaporeans to join when they reach 30. It is supposed to provide “better protection against the uncertainty of long-term care costs”.

In any case, going by Tong’s confidence of the healthy trust bestowed on the PAP government by Singaporean public, it looks like Tong and his compatriots in People’s Action Party (PAP) should have nothing to worry about in the next coming General Election.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Restrictions on home-based businesses could be eased in time for Hari Raya, says Masagos Zulkifli

If the situation improves soon, restrictions on home-based businesses (HBB) might be…

【陈有明文章风波】6月5日国会辩论提出 毕丹星:为何陈有明不及时提出反驳?

对于内政暨律政部长尚穆根声援同僚陈有明,工人党秘书长毕丹星也很快在昨晚发文回应。除了说明“友爱批判者”一词,实则出自许通美教授,也反问当初他在国会致词提到这点,为何陈有明和尚穆根等行动党议员没有及时提出反驳? 毕丹星先是声明该党始终站在新加坡立场,当马国进入新加坡争议水域时,工人党就已表态马国举动“具挑衅成分且不必要”,在此事上该党全力支持负责协调水域争议的前线部队和官员。 “尚穆根质问,我究竟站在哪边?我想外交部长(维文)在一项公开论坛的说辞形容得最好:没有任何政党政治干预我国的外交政策诉求,这是幸运的;当前反对党(工人党)扮演他们的角色,我们也对他们有信心,这使得我的外交工作更为得心应手。 ” 故此,毕丹星称毫无疑问工人党肯定捍卫新加坡的立场。 然而, 毕丹星也指出,“友爱批判者”( loving critics)一词,实则出自巡回大使许通美教授。尽管自己未详细追踪亚菲言针对马国的论点,但他也借用这一词形容亚菲言,且不论族群文化,都同样珍视这些剧作家的提出的关键、和批判性的思考。 “如同亚菲言这样的新加坡人,不应被断章取义然后在国会中遭训诫。” 毕丹星:陈有明为何不在国会提出反对? 但毕丹星也强调,若任何国人拒绝遵循新加坡的宪法,或在海外以政治议程诋毁新加坡,工人党肯定不会认同。 同时,毕丹星也揶揄,自己在国会作出上述论述时,却不见陈有明医生立即提出反对;即便尚穆根等过去也一再热衷于要求工人党澄清他们的立场。…

Duo from The Real Singapore arrested under Sedition Act

Two persons from The Real Singapore (TRS) have been arrested and investigated by…

马国政府延后实施 外国车辆入境准证措施至明年

马来西亚政府宣布将延后实施外国车辆入境准证措施直至明年。 马国交通部长陆兆福今日(9日)于记者会中表示,由于在安装无线射频识别RFID标签上出现技术上的问题,无法应付众多安装无线射频标签车辆的流量,故将延后实施外国车辆入境准证措施。 他也提醒,尽管外国车辆入境准证措施将在明年才实施,但也需确保所有新加坡车辆做好准备。措施落实后,无安装RFID的入境车辆,在出境时可能会被罚款。 马国交通部今年4月曾表示,若外国车辆入境准证措施实施后,只有经注册外国车辆的车子才获准入境马来西亚,该措施原定于今年10月开始实施。 然而,在10月1日起,众多外国车辆发现该措施并没有如期执行,一些本地车主也反映,未安装“外国入境车辆射频识别标签”。 对此,马国交通部表示,“没有实施,直到另行通知”,在上月杪,马国交通部说将在“尖峰时段”暂缓执法不开罚。