A SingPost postman has been dismissed by SingPost after it was revealed that he had thrown mails into the rubbish bin.

This was said by a SingPost spokesperson in response to media queries of a viral social media post which had a series of videos showing stacks of letters being thrown into rubbish bins and a postman confessing to his acts in a confrontation by a member of public.

The company confirmed the incident had happened at a condominium on Wednesday and said it did not condone the incident.

“We do not condone this and he has since been dismissed,” said the spokesperson. “SingPost thanks the member of the public for bringing this to our attention, and we would like to apologise to the residents of the estate for the service lapse.”

“We have since retrieved the mail and will be processing them.”

Postman admits on video that he threw away the mail

In the viral social media post that has been deleted,  a member of public who likely a paying customer of Singpost confronts the postman in Mandarin, asking the postman to confess whether or not he made the deliveries.

Below is a part of the conversation in the video translated from Mandarin to English 

Customer: …Be a bit more cooperative and be a bit more honest. A lie, If you lied, just admit it.  If someone asked you to distribute, and you put it somewhere else, just be honest and admit it. If don’t admit, I will dig them out one by one. Now the whole of SingPost knows my problem. I won’t let this matter go to rest. I want to find my paper, where exactly it is.  To you, it is just a piece of paper of no significance. To me, it is very important to me. You come to Singapore to work, we welcome you. But don’t make the standards degrade till so bad. Just because of one person, SingPost’s reputation is in ruins. Do you understand?

Postman: This I also know, maybe if I told you, you wouldn’t believe. But I come from China, and I talk about a practical problem. Not that we willingly throw or being irresponsible.I have over 2,600 over mail. Everyday, including registered mail, you look at the offices and condominiums, (those given to) Malay staff are very few, it is really unfair to me. Originally, I was going to see the doctor today because my ankle hurts, which is why I…”

Claims by postman that he was being overburdened with work

Other than admitting to throwing the mail away, the postman also explained to the customer that the reason for his actions is because he was tired and treated unfairly.

He said he had intended to go to a doctor for his hurting ankle but he was told to do overtime by his boss. He shared that he was given to give out 2,600 letters that day and was told to do overtime, noting that the Malay staff are not given as much mail as his.

He also noted that he was paid $120 a day with no overtime pay.

The postman, who said he is a Chinese national, said that he will be returning to China on Friday. He commented that he might have considered coming back to Singapore but has decided not to, given that this matter is being brought to light.

Offence to throw away mail

It would seem to a layman that the dismissed postman committed an offence under the Postal Service Act, section 34 (1) Any officer, employee or agent of a postal licensee who — (a) destroys or throws away any postal article or anything contained therein.

Such an offence is liable on conviction to a fine not exceeding $10,000 or to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 3 years or to both and, in the case of a continuing offence, to a further fine not exceeding $1,000 for every day or part thereof during which the offence continues after conviction.

It is unknown if the postman has gone back to China as mentioned in the video and whether is there any intention file charges for the offence.

Story not a surprise for members of public

Commenting on Channel News Asia’s Facebook, See Han Xiang wrote:” can’t believe it is still the same after so many years… Encountered the same incident 7 years ago, wrote to ST forum and it got published. Singpost sent some PR person to assure us that they take action so that it won’t happen again. Guess nothing changed after all.”

Another commenter, Jacqueline Tan wrote: This is only one of the many incidents that involved singpost postman. Encountered a few times registered mail postman did not even bother to ring my bell & just leave the collection note in my mailbox. Did feedback to singpost but the situation doesn’t seem to improve.

Johnny Liew wrote: “Sing Post so quickly buried this incident by dismissing the staff but never find the root cause like the staff said was too tired and OT don’t receive pay and etc. Really good management”

 

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

酝酿社会分化加剧的“超富”新加坡社会

国内贫富之间加剧扩大的鸿沟,致使越来越多国人不禁思考,这片土地是否仍是最初为之流汗、为后代子孙奋斗的”应许之地“,还是越发变成了少数”利益相关者“高处不胜寒的巨塔? 上周四,瑞士信贷研究院(Credit Suisse Research Institute)发布2018年全球财富报告,指新加坡人的整体财富增加7.4%至1.3万亿美元(约1.8万亿新元)。每名成年人的财富增加5.3%至28万3000美元以上,全球排名第九、亚洲领先。 在2000年,成年人均财富为11万4720美元。报告指财富增值主要因素包括较高的储蓄、资产增值和2005年至2012年间的币值汇率增值。 此外,新加坡的百万富翁增加了11.2巴仙,即18万3737人。也预测未来五年该人数将以每年增加5.5巴仙,达到23万9640人。 直至今年中,我国有大约1千名财富超过5千万美元的超高净值人士,人数增加了1.1巴仙。不过,未知有关统计是否也把我国高薪内阁成员涵括在“超高净值—疯狂巨富”群体中。 正当有些人浸淫在所谓“新加坡人变得富足”的自我感觉良好,《南华早报》在采访本地学者的报导中,却提出令人不安的事实–我国社会面临不断增长的社会分化。 会遗传的贫富差距 新加坡国立大学社会学系副教授陈恩赐,在接受《南华早报》采访时表示,现在在我国,阶级和身份背景对于社会流动的影响更大。根据衡量收入差距的基尼系数(从零到一,一为最不平等),我国自1980年以来的基尼系数就一直在0.40分以上波动,在去年则达到0.417分。 英国2015年度基尼系数为0.52、美国0.506,香港在2016年得分0.539,显示在先进国中的收入不均问题迫在眉睫。…

Lawrence Wong says govt will want to make wearing masks mandatory "in certain circumstances"

The media reported today that all workers handling food will now have…

工地意外 员工起重机上受伤获救

一名在40米高塔式起重机上工作的人员脚受伤,无法安全落地,紧急招来民防部队到场营救。 民防部队今早(9月8日)在脸书帖文指出,昨午约4时25分,当局接获来自禾山径(How Sun Walk)建筑工地的求救电话。 民防部队灾难拯救队(DART)赶抵现场后,四名拯救人员使用便梯抵达起重机上的伤者,固定位置后,架上绳索和滑轮。 其中一名接受过紧急医疗技术培训的拯救人员直接在40米高的空中,为伤者简单治疗和包裹伤口。 此外,另一组拯救人员在地面上,将担架连接到从起重机上降下来的绳索上,随后由在起重机上的拯救人员仔细将伤者的担架固定好,以送到地面上。 有关的拯救行动耗费了一小时,伤者被送到陆地上后,拯救人员也缓缓地从起重机上回到地面,伤者随后也被送到盛港综合医院。  

美参议院通过《香港人权民主法案》;联合国人权理事会吁和平解决

美国参议院正式以“一致通过方式”(Unanimous Consent)通过《香港人权民主法案》的参议院版本,也通过了有关限制非致命武器出口的《保护香港法案》。 据《路透社》报道,由于参议院所提交的版本与众议院的《香港人权民主法案》有所差异,因此两院将需处理法案之间的差异,最后再移交总统签署。同时,参议院亦一致通过第二项法案:《保护香港法案》,该法案将禁止向香港警察部队部分弹药如催泪弹要、胡椒喷雾、橡皮子弹等物品。 但白宫仍未即时作出回应,白宫发言人则表示,总统特朗普仍未决定会签署或否决香港人权法案。 法案提案人卢比奧(Marco Rubio)对此表示,“香港市民已预知未来的情况,他们看到了他们的自治权与自由正在逐步被侵蚀”,意指香港目前受到北京政府的“暴力镇压”。 《BBC中文网报道》,针对《香港人权民主法案》,中国外交部发言人耿爽表示,该法案干涉中国内政,严重违反国际法和国际关系基本准则,因此表示强烈的谴责与反对。 香港特区政府则表示遗憾,认为两项法案既无必要,亦毫无理据,更会损害香港与美国双方的关系和利益。 人权理事会:暴力不能容忍,香港当局应和平解决 此外,香港示威升级也引起国际社会的高度关注,联合国人权理事会周二(19日)发出声明表示关于香港理工大学的局势发展,并敦促当局应尽其所能缓和局势,和平解决。 人权理事会表示,绝大多数香港人在过去一直依法实行和平集会,但对于香港的年轻人日益实施暴力对抗的行为,显示他们对香港局势的愤怒与深深的不满。 针对香港局势中所出现的任何暴力行为,人权理事会则部分示威者针对包括警队来诉诸极端暴力,对此深感遗憾及不能容忍,因此呼吁任何参与示威活动勿使用暴力。…