A Singapore ambassador has written a letter to rebut statements made by two former top Indonesian air force officials regarding the Republic’s control of Indonesian airspace above the Riau Islands, that it “misrepresented facts” in linking the issue to sovereignty.

In a Facebook post on the Facebook page of Singapore’s embassy in Jakarta on Tuesday (12 December), a letter from Singapore’s ambassador to Indonesia, Anil Kumar Nayar to MetroTVnews.com was reproduced.

In the letter to MetroTVnews, the ambassador took issue with an article, “The Government should immediately control flights over KEPRI skies” by the media outlet which reported on comments on the Singapore Flight Information Region (FIR) by former Indonesian Air Force Chief of Staff, Air Chief Marshal (Ret’d) Chappy Hakim, and Chairman of the Air Power Centre of Indonesia Air Vice Marshal (Ret’d) Koesnadi Kardi.

Mr Nayar stressed in his letter that the FIR is not an issue of sovereignty but instead, it is based on operational and technical considerations to provide effective air traffic control services, saying, “The paramount priority is aviation safety. This complex issue is under the ambit of the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO), and involves other countries and international users of the busy airspace covered by the FIR.”

The ambassador noted that it is not unusual for the air traffic authorities of one country to provide air traffic management services in the territorial airspace of another country.

Citing Indonesia as an example, Mr Nayar said that the country provides air traffic management services in airspace which belongs to other countries.

He stressed that Singapore has repeatedly said that the FIR is not an issue of sovereignty, but of the safety and efficiency of commercial air traffic.

Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong noted that Indonesian politicians have been talking about taking back their airspace from Singapore last month.

The PM said that the issue has unfortunately become politicised, making the problem harder to solve.

Given that foreign relations may come under strain when national pride and sovereignty is involved, Mr Lee said this is why Singapore should take a “long term” approach when building diplomatic ties.

The comments made by Former Chief of Staff of TNI AU Marshal Chappy Hakim, assessed that the sovereignty of the Indonesian state especially in the Riau Islands (Batam and Natuna) airspace is absent since the regulation of air traffic in the region is still controlled by Singapore.

“Logically speaking, in general, large countries are obliged to help smaller neighboring countries and not vice versa,” Mr Chappy said.

“It is clear that in reality Singapore is central and will defend desperately the authority over air traffic arrangements at FIR Natuna,” he added.

Mr Chappy then said that he appreciated Indonesia President Jokowi Dodo’s move in 18 September 2015 who had issued a directive to reclaim control of the FIR from Singapore.

“Actually,” he added, “efforts to restore Indonesian sovereignty and honor can be done. Moreover, FIR Natuna is a critical border area for Indonesia in the Malacca Strait. However, keep in mind, it takes a great will and courage.”

He then noted that one of the way is the creation of a joint agency of ATC (air traffic control) of Indonesia-Singapore which allocates revenue from the management of our sovereign air area under FIR Natuna to prepare equipment and quality improvement of ATC Indonesia Human Resources.

Mr Nayar then pointed out that Mr Kardi’s claim is “untrue”, saying that all Route Air Navigation Services (RANS) charges that Singapore collected on behalf of Indonesia are remitted to Indonesia’s Directorate-General of Civil Aviation (DGCA), after deducting bank transfer costs.

He said, “DGCA Indonesia has always found the accounts to be in order.”

He also hoped that the clarification of the facts will set the record straight and prevent unnecessary misunderstandings.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Investigations on alleged neglect in nursing home stalled for over 2 years, family wants justice

Davis Ks Ong, a local citizen had shared in a Facebook post…

卫生部集团总监:不因无力支付被拒 国民均能获妥善医疗照护

“我才意识到,原来病患从私人医生被转介到政府医院看专科医生可能无法享有补贴,只有综合诊所转介的病人才有资格享用。” 网民Tan Keong Boon周二(10日)发表文章《医疗费用:帮助那些无法享用补贴的人们》到海峡时报论坛中,质问为何立国一代不能享有补贴,如果是从私人诊所转介到政府医院。 文章表示,大多数受雇人士都可以到与公司合作的家庭科医生,其中是因为可以享用与雇主共同支付,即使在退休后,他们在没有雇主的共同支付下,仍然需要和同一位医生继续跟进病情。 对此,作者表示是否可将补贴扩大至私人医生转介的病患。 建国立国一代转介专科均有补贴 卫生部集团总监Chan Beng Seng,今日于《海峡时报》论坛上否认此说法,表示当建国一代与立国一代被转介到专科时,均有资格获得补贴。不仅仅是综合诊所转介的,获得社保援助计划(CHAS)的私人医生也可以获得补贴。 换句话说,只有社保援助计划(CHAS)批准的私人家庭科医生在转介给政府医院时,才能获得补贴,那也算是半政府经营的诊所之一。 卫生部表示,“在专科,病人可以享有高达75巴仙的门诊服务补贴,而建国一代与立国一代则可享用额外的服务与药物补贴费用。而早前由私人家庭科医生的病患,无论是建国一代还是立国一代,都可告知专科,再由工作人员申请将他们转入补贴服务中。”…

PM Lee tightens up COVID-19 measures, asks SGs to say yusheng phrases in their hearts

Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong made a Facebook post on Saturday (23…

SDP’s Mansura Sajahan calls out Minister Ong Ye Kung for being "very irresponsible" for not making it compulsory for students to wear mask

Earlier on 21 May, Education Minister Ong Ye Kung addressed some of…