A Singapore ambassador has written a letter to rebut statements made by two former top Indonesian air force officials regarding the Republic’s control of Indonesian airspace above the Riau Islands, that it “misrepresented facts” in linking the issue to sovereignty.

In a Facebook post on the Facebook page of Singapore’s embassy in Jakarta on Tuesday (12 December), a letter from Singapore’s ambassador to Indonesia, Anil Kumar Nayar to MetroTVnews.com was reproduced.

In the letter to MetroTVnews, the ambassador took issue with an article, “The Government should immediately control flights over KEPRI skies” by the media outlet which reported on comments on the Singapore Flight Information Region (FIR) by former Indonesian Air Force Chief of Staff, Air Chief Marshal (Ret’d) Chappy Hakim, and Chairman of the Air Power Centre of Indonesia Air Vice Marshal (Ret’d) Koesnadi Kardi.

Mr Nayar stressed in his letter that the FIR is not an issue of sovereignty but instead, it is based on operational and technical considerations to provide effective air traffic control services, saying, “The paramount priority is aviation safety. This complex issue is under the ambit of the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO), and involves other countries and international users of the busy airspace covered by the FIR.”

The ambassador noted that it is not unusual for the air traffic authorities of one country to provide air traffic management services in the territorial airspace of another country.

Citing Indonesia as an example, Mr Nayar said that the country provides air traffic management services in airspace which belongs to other countries.

He stressed that Singapore has repeatedly said that the FIR is not an issue of sovereignty, but of the safety and efficiency of commercial air traffic.

Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong noted that Indonesian politicians have been talking about taking back their airspace from Singapore last month.

The PM said that the issue has unfortunately become politicised, making the problem harder to solve.

Given that foreign relations may come under strain when national pride and sovereignty is involved, Mr Lee said this is why Singapore should take a “long term” approach when building diplomatic ties.

The comments made by Former Chief of Staff of TNI AU Marshal Chappy Hakim, assessed that the sovereignty of the Indonesian state especially in the Riau Islands (Batam and Natuna) airspace is absent since the regulation of air traffic in the region is still controlled by Singapore.

“Logically speaking, in general, large countries are obliged to help smaller neighboring countries and not vice versa,” Mr Chappy said.

“It is clear that in reality Singapore is central and will defend desperately the authority over air traffic arrangements at FIR Natuna,” he added.

Mr Chappy then said that he appreciated Indonesia President Jokowi Dodo’s move in 18 September 2015 who had issued a directive to reclaim control of the FIR from Singapore.

“Actually,” he added, “efforts to restore Indonesian sovereignty and honor can be done. Moreover, FIR Natuna is a critical border area for Indonesia in the Malacca Strait. However, keep in mind, it takes a great will and courage.”

He then noted that one of the way is the creation of a joint agency of ATC (air traffic control) of Indonesia-Singapore which allocates revenue from the management of our sovereign air area under FIR Natuna to prepare equipment and quality improvement of ATC Indonesia Human Resources.

Mr Nayar then pointed out that Mr Kardi’s claim is “untrue”, saying that all Route Air Navigation Services (RANS) charges that Singapore collected on behalf of Indonesia are remitted to Indonesia’s Directorate-General of Civil Aviation (DGCA), after deducting bank transfer costs.

He said, “DGCA Indonesia has always found the accounts to be in order.”

He also hoped that the clarification of the facts will set the record straight and prevent unnecessary misunderstandings.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Quicker immigration clearance for eligible Japanese and South Korean travellers to Singapore

Starting from tomorrow (28 August), eligible Japan and South Korea passport holders…

HSBC恐裁员4000人 或将针对高层主管开刀

香港最大银行汇丰控股(HSBC)周一(5日)宣布,预计裁员千4000名员工,并将放缓投资开支。据最新的季度报告指出,全球经济前景正在恶化,截至2018年,汇丰银行共有23万5217名员工,将多达2巴仙的员工可能失去工作。 财务董事邵伟信(Ewen Stevenson)在电话会议上表示,将针对“高层主管”进行裁员,裁员加上自然流失,可望节省高达4巴仙工资成本。 汇丰银行则续指,今年的遣散费或将从6.5亿美元(约8.9 亿新元)上升至7亿美元(约9.7亿新元)。 对此,汇丰银行亦透露详细裁员细节,包括裁员行动和是否会涉及新加坡分行。 汇丰控股集团主席杜嘉祺(Mark Tucker)表示,“新加坡是其中八个投资战略国之一,是我们于亚洲与东南亚国家中相当重视的发展,故会持续聚焦与支持新加坡的业务。 而汇丰银行首席执行官范宁(John Flint)于周一(5日)无预警宣布辞任,范宁于去年2月上任,在位仅18个月。 据《路透社》引述爆料者指出,他的辞任相信与长期以来向高层管理人员施压,要求减低成本以求盈利增长,该项决策与汇丰控股集团主席有所出入。 随着中美贸易战升级,货币政策周期放缓、香港局势的动荡以及脱欧,汇丰银行预测未来业务前景会更加暗淡。…

部长称部分小贩诉求乃“情绪化流言” 小贩撰文表达失望

国会于今日复会,小贩中心议题再次成为话题,10多名议员、非选区议员和官委议员参与提问和辩论,至少21项提问,要求环境及水源部长解释有关社企小贩中心的经营模式,或其他与小贩中心有关的课题。 环境及水源部高级政务部长许连碹博士在国会上澄清,社企小贩中心的摊位租金中位数,在每月2000元左右,与现有小贩中心的1700元相近。 此外,社企小贩中心的杂费、清理桌子的费用也与现有小贩中心的收费相近,有些甚至更低。 许连碹在答复中表示,社企小贩中心的摊位租金中位数约每月2000元,并非一些媒体所报道的每月4000元。她说,现有小贩中心的摊位租金中位数是1700元,价位相近;不过在摊位面积方面,社企小贩中心的摊位介于10到21平方米,相比之下,现有小贩中心的摊位只有5到13平方米。 在实际摊位租金方面,社企小贩摊位每月的租金介于750元到3700元之间。这也与现有小贩中心无津贴摊位所需支付的每月640元到3900元类似。 早前,她认为关于社企小贩议题,有一部分是受“情绪化的道听途说所驱动,或许是出于善意,不过有些被误导和未经证实。” 高级部长或许认为,这些小贩的个人经历并不真实,只是企图在煽风点火。 另一方面,环境及水源部长马善高在国会也附和许连碹,指社企小贩中心模式“整体上是健全的,食物价格维持在可负担水平,为顾客提供各式高质量的食物选择,价格一般比邻近的咖啡店和食阁便宜。大部分的摊贩的生意也不错,不能让这些成就功亏一篑。” 他声称政府会“继续采用和改进社企小贩中心的模式,更好地满足公众的需求,并照顾摊贩的福利。” 如今,小贩林家良对于许连碹的说辞,直言“失望已无法盖过他沉重的情绪”。 “我们不是笨蛋,也不会对我们的同业的遭遇视而不见。我们肯定不会散播假新闻(如果您如此认为的话)。我们给足了即便在法律严格审查下也能站得住脚的的书面证据和资料。” 而小贩们的诉求,也成功促使环境局在短短两周内重新审视、并推翻了那些不利小贩营生的条款。没有来自民间的诉求和挑战,威权恐怕不会让步。…

Netizens beseech East Coast and Tanjong Pagar residents to vote alternative parties so PAP’s Tharman Shanmugaratnam can become next PM

The People’s Action Party (PAP) made an unexpected and last minute move…