Source : Wikipedia.

The Land Transport Authority (LTA) has announced that it has completed its investigations into the flooding incident that occurred in the tunnels between Bishan and Braddell MRT stations on 7 October 2017, which affected about 231,000 commuters due to the stoppage of train services on 7 and 8 October 2017.

LTA investigations have concluded that the incident was entirely preventable had the SMRT team responsible for the maintenance of the Bishan storm water sump pit and pump system carried out their duties as prescribed under the maintenance regime.

It said that LTA found the existing flood protection measures at Bishan tunnel portal were designed to be more than adequate to handle the rainfall that fell on 7 October 2017. The storm water sump pit has a capacity of 5,044 cubic metres, which is much more than the estimated 640 cubic metres of rainfall that was cleared from the tunnels between Bishan and Braddell MRT stations.

“This is complemented by three high capacity pumps each capable of removing 85 litres of water per second from the storm water sump pit. These flood protection measures, which are designed with a huge buffer, have safeguarded the Bishan tunnel portal entrance for over 30 years without incident,” it noted.

According to LTA, Independent laboratory tests by Singapore Test Services (STS) also found that the individual components of the Bishan storm water pump system were not defective.

Representatives from LTA, SMRT and the national water agency PUB, participated in the tests and reviewed the results, which confirmed that all five float switches and the pump motor control panel were functional. The three storm water sump pumps at Bishan were also in working condition, as they could be manually activated following the incident.

“Representatives from LTA, SMRT and PUB were present to witness the tests and review the findings,” LTA stated.

LTA noted that based on further laboratory tests by STS, there are three possible scenarios for why the Bishan storm water sump pump system, while functional, failed to work as intended.

These are:

  • The lowest “stop” float switch was likely impeded by accumulated silt and sludge in the storm water sump pit, which prevented the storm water sump pumps from activating;
  • The highest “alarm” float switch, which is wired independently from the other four float switches, could have been impeded by floating debris in the storm water sump pit, which prevented the SMRT Operations Control Centre from being alerted of rising water levels in the pit; and/or
  • The SMRT crew that conducted corrective maintenance for the storm water pump system on 13 July 2017 may have failed to switch the pump controls back to “Automatic” mode after work was done.

“Precisely which of these three possible failure scenarios, or a combination of them, led to the events of 7 October 2017, cannot be established definitively, as the exact conditions cannot be recreated following immediate remedial works to the Bishan storm water sump pit and pump system,” said LTA, adding that this includes the clearing of silt, sludge and debris from the sump pit; and the installation of new pumps and float switches to further mitigate the risk of a reoccurrence.

Nonetheless, the authority stressed that all three possible failure scenarios could only arise as a result of a lack of proper maintenance, audits and supervision.

It noted that SMRT had also separately and independently found that the team responsible for carrying out preventive maintenance works for the Bishan storm water sump pit and pump system was remiss as they had not been carrying out the required works on the purported maintenance dates, and in fact, falsified maintenance records.

LTA said that SMRT has accepted full responsibility for the incident and has since disciplined the staff found responsible.

“LTA and SMRT have also implemented numerous engineering enhancements to improve the robustness and resilience of flood protection measures at Bishan and other tunnel portals to further mitigate the risk of a recurrence,” it said.

LTA said that lessons learnt from the flooding incident were shared today at the 5th Joint Forum on Infrastructure Maintenance.

The forum, which is jointly organised by LTA, PUB, SMRT and SBST, is said by LTA to bring together the collective expertise of agencies involved in the maintenance of critical infrastructure and allow discussion of measures to ensure that Singapore’s critical infrastructure stays resilient to flood risks.

It noted that the forum also highlighted the importance of all building and infrastructure owners carrying out regular preventive maintenance and reviews of the adequacy of their flood protection measures, particularly with the increasing impact of climate change.

“In addition, a joint LTA-PUB Standing Committee was announced to look into the overall design of flood prevention measures and institutionalise knowledge on flood prevention,” LTA said.

Mr Ridzuan Ismail, Director, Catchment and Waterways Department, PUB, said, “We recognise that LTA has worked with SMRT to enhance the resilience of flood protection measures following the incident. We also appreciate collaboration with these agencies in sharing information with other infrastructure owners with our common objective of staying resilient to flooding risks.”

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Lee Hsien Yang suggests that gov’t COVID-19 task force should have been led by an infectious diseases specialist instead of politicians

“Perhaps the Multi Ministry Task Force should have been led by an…

营业额下跌八成忧倒闭 本地招牌肉骨茶店公开求助

42年的本地招牌餐馆 “发起人肉骨茶” 在社媒公开呼救,促请民众帮忙熬过当前的经济难关,更表示已面临倒闭危机。 发起人肉骨茶昨日(7月15日)在脸书上帖文,指出该餐馆目前正面对自开店以来,最艰难的时期,餐馆营业额在过去五个月下跌了超过八成。 为了不让42年的努力付诸东流,该餐馆自明日起(17日)至8月17日,在旗下庄家大酒店(Hotel Boss)、白沙浮商场(Bugis)和城东(Downtown East)分店,首次推出折扣超过30巴仙的特备家庭套餐。 “这项特别促销是为了感激大家在阻断措施期间的支持(如果没有你们的支持,我们无法坚持到现在),希望能鼓励大家再次上门。” 帖文发出后,18小时获得两千人转发、445个评论,很多网民都表示会给予支持,“我是你多年的常客,并且会继续下去”、“来自曼谷的鼓励,我真的希望当情况好转后,我到新加坡旅游时还能到你的店去”、“我家乡的肉骨茶,一定会支持!”。

MOM bars intra-corporate transferees from bringing in family members; those under CECA exempted

It was reported in the media today that since 2 months ago…

对“越南入侵柬埔寨”论感惊讶 柬防长要求李显龙更正

根据柬埔寨媒体《高棉时报》报导,因不满我国总理李显龙指越南在1979年“入侵柬埔寨”,柬埔寨国防部长狄班(Tea Banh)和当地国会议员对李显龙发言感到惊讶,且反驳其发言未反映史实。 李显龙是在5月31日,于个人脸书专页发文哀悼泰国前首相布勒姆的逝世。其中提及布勒姆当年曾反对“越南入侵柬埔寨”,且不承认取代红高棉的柬埔寨政府。 李显龙指泰国站在最前线,在柬泰边界面对越南部队。布勒姆当时坚决不接受此情况,与东盟伙伴合作,在国际论坛上反对越南的侵占,“这阻止了军事入侵和政权更迭被合理化,保护东南亚各国的安全。” 李显龙也形容布勒姆是新加坡的好朋友,和其父亲已故建国总理李光耀密切合作,加强新泰关系。 针对总理言论,柬防长向黄永宏反映 对于李显龙的上述言论,柬埔寨国防部长狄班乘着上周末出席在新加坡举行的香格里拉对话会,向我国国防部长黄永宏反映此事。 狄班在周一晚上返抵金边国际机场,接受媒体访问时表示,他已要求黄永宏告知李总理,对其言论作出更正。 “他(李显龙)的言论是不实、未反映史实的,说越南军队入侵柬埔寨完全不对,我们请他作出更正。” 狄班表示无法接受李显龙的言论,“我们已经澄清,当年越南志愿部队来到解放我们的人民,我们仍认为他们是来解救百姓的性命,对我们有显著意义。” 事实上,我国总理在香格里拉对话会的开幕晚宴上致词时,也曾提及越南曾入侵柬埔寨。 另一方面,根据《柬中时报》报导,柬埔寨一名国会议员洪玛尼(现任首相洪森的小儿子)同一天在脸书发帖,对李显龙文章表示不认同,而且非常惊讶。…