Local non-government organisation, AWARE has expressed its concern via its Facebook page in regards to the charges filed against Jolovan Wham, a well-known labour and human rights activist in Singapore by the authorities.

Just this morning, Wham was charged with seven charges by the Attorney-General’s Chambers which include three counts of organizing a public assembly without a police permit and one count of vandalism for sticking two A-4 paper on a MRT train.

In its post, AWARE refers Wham as a social worker and civil society activist with a long track record of good work for marginalised people, especially women migrant domestic workers and states that Wham’s case raises important questions about whether the laws and regulations on assembly in Singapore are too restrictive.

“Our own experience of organising events at Hong Lim and elsewhere is that seeking a permit can be cumbersome and uncertain. Sometimes we have not been informed of the outcome of the application until the day just before, which makes publicity and logistics – especially for foreign speakers – difficult.” wrote AWARE.

It added that it is important to make space for diverse voices in Singapore society and noted when the conditions for speaking up about social and political issues are restrictive and carry potential criminal liability, it can have an intimidating effect on the public and discourage people from expressing their views.

“Some regulation of public assembly may be necessary to safeguard the public interest in safety and prevent disruption. Yet it may be timely to reconsider how restrictive these regulations should be. Events that do not threaten the safety and well-being of any person, damage any property or cause disruption to ordinary affairs should not be made difficult to organise, and it is doubtful whether society’s interests are best served by making them liable to criminal prosecution.” wrote AWARE.

Under Singapore law, all public assemblies must be applied for and be given a police permit before the event is carried out. However, it is very rare for the Police to approve applications for public assembly unless the event is organised by the ruling party.

Legal protest approved by the police in 2007, headed by PAP MPs for World Consumer Rights Day
Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Think Centre, Forum Asia call for Singapore to vote for resolution on moratorium on use of death penalty

On Monday, 19 December 2016, in New York, the 193 member nations…

LFL urges S’pore AGC to withdraw threat against Malaysian death row prisoners’ counsel M Ravi

Malaysia-based human rights group Lawyers For Liberty (LFL) on Wed (5 Feb)…

MHA responds to Branson’s call to halt Tangaraju’s execution, accusing him for “disrespect” for Singapore’s judges

On Monday (24 Apr), British tycoon Richard Branson urged Singapore to halt the imminent execution of Tangaraju Suppiah, a Singaporean who sentenced to death over one kilogram of cannabis, saying it “may be about to kill an innocent man”. “Tangaraju was actually not anywhere near these drugs at the time of his arrest. This was largely a circumstantial case that relied on inferences,” Branson, who is a member of the Geneva-based Global Commission on Drug Policy, wrote on his blog. “Killing those at the lowest rungs of the illicit drug supply chain… is hardly effective in curbing an international trade worth hundreds of billions every year,” he said, adding he hoped authorities would review the case. Tangaraju, aged 46, is set to be hanged on Wednesday (26 Apr), according to the Central Narcotics Bureau (CNB) of Singapore. However, Singapore’s Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA) defended that the evidence clearly showed that Tangaraju was “coordinating the delivery of drugs for trafficking”, despite the suggestion that he was innocent because he was “not anywhere near the drugs at the time of his arrest”.