Source: Lee Hsien Yang and Lee Hsien Loong Facebook account.

Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong said that he is not sure if the dispute with his siblings over plans to demolish the home of Lee Kuan Yew has been solved while his younger brother, Lee Hsien Yang claims in a Facebook post that his elder brother has not reached out to the siblings despite PM Lee’s statement saying that he is unsure.

In a wide ranging interview with CNBC which comes ahead of PM Lee’s official working visit to the United States from 22 to 26 October at the invitation of US President Donald Trump, PM Lee said, “The matter is in abeyance. I am not sure that it is solved,”

This was said in response to a question on whether he and his siblings have resolved the issue.

PM Lee also revealed that he was “of course” sad about the falling out and that he and his siblings had not “recently communicated”

“I think they are where they are. Perhaps one day when emotions have subsided, some movement will be possible. These things take time,” PM Lee said.

His comments comes four months after a rare feud between PM Lee and his siblings, Mr Lee Hsien Yang and Dr Lee Wei Ling, spilled over into the public domain which led to the Prime Minister calling for a parliamentary debate on the matter in July this year that lasted two days.

Mr Lee Hsien Yang and Dr Lee Weiling had alleged their brother of abusing his political office to prevent the demolition of the family home at 38 Oxley Road, as last willed by their late father.

However, PM Lee has denied the allegations.

Responding to his brother’s comment on the interview, Lee Hsien Yang, wrote on a Facebook post on Friday (20 October), stated that Hsien Loong has made no attempt to reach out to them to resolve matters in private, which is notwithstanding his public statements.

Mr Lee Hsien Yang wrote, “Meanwhile, the Attorney General is busy prosecuting Hsien Loong’s nephew for his private correspondence. The AGC’s letters make repeated reference to the family feud,”

The Facebook post was also shared by Dr Lee on her Facebook page.

Mr Lee Hsien Yang’s son, Lee Sheng Wu was earlier charged by the Attorney General’s Chamber due to a private Facebook posting which the AGC deems to be in contempt of the courts.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

救济食品不应为了送而送 志工吁应先了解弱势老人状况

当你看见独居高龄老人时,是否会想向他们伸出援手?而民以食为天,一般会想到的方式就是为他们解决三餐,不让他们挨饿,所以会送上许多佐料和食材,希望他们不用出门也可以填饱肚子。但,你是否想过这真的是他们所需要的吗? “让希望活下去”(Keeping Hope Alive)志愿组织于周三(28日)在脸书上呼吁,民众勿将食材和佐料随意送往独居老人。 该组织创办人潘迎芬分享,有一名80岁左右的独居老人,家中堆满无数的包装食品与佐料。根据老人表示,这些食物都是由别人捐送,但他其实并不会下厨。 “想象你在一名80岁老人住处里看见无数食物与佐料。这些都是民众“捐送”给他,问题是老人无法下厨!“,志工表示。 志工随后要大家反思捐送的意义,是真的为了满足对方所需,还是仅仅为了安抚自己的内心?他在文内最后也表示,只有送出别人真正需要的东西,付出才会显得更有价值。 她说,“请想想我们真的是为了给出对方所需要的东西吗?还是仅仅为了安抚自己,认为自己正在做一件善事?付出是一门艺术与智慧的体现。请给出对方所需的,而不是我们想要,付出才会显得更有意义。 潘迎芬想表达的,并不是赠送食物是错误的行为,而是在赠送前需想清楚对方的需求。许多独居老人可能年纪渐长的关系,活动力早已大不如前。对他们而言,可能简单的起身或蹲下都相当困难。 如同潘迎芬曾在帖文内分享另一例子:他们在帮助一名90岁老人收拾住处时发现一些腐烂的食物,经询问后发现,老人其实很爱料理食物,但由于年纪渐长,活动力较差而无法自己动手,才会很少下厨。 帖文上传后,引起网友的关注,网友纷纷赞同志工的想法,认为要帮助人首先要了解其需求,而不是给出自己所想,这样才显得有意义。 网友Karen…

SPF debunk rumours about ComfortDelGro taxi fitted with cameras is a Traffic Police vehicle; saying it is for taxi driver’s training purpose

An image that went viral on messaging platforms shows a ComfortDelGro taxi…

傅海燕称NETS争议广告无恶意,但“美丽求求你”讽刺视频不妥

今年7月底,闹得沸沸扬扬的电子支付平台NETS广告风波引起热议,除了广告公司和艺人周崇庆致歉,网红“美丽求求你”(Preetipls)也因为拍摄讽刺视频,被警方介入调查,并发出24个月有条件警告。 昨日(10日),文化、社区及青年部长傅海燕在一项活动上重提此事,她表示并不觉得NETS广告有任何冒犯之意,反而是网红“美丽求求你“的讽刺视频使用侮辱性语言, 行为实属不妥。 傅海燕昨日受邀至义顺星烁初级学院参与种族和谐资源中心OnePeople.SG的第五届模拟联合国大会,在对话会上,学生重提争议广告。 对此,傅海燕坦言她个人认为对于周崇庆所饰演的角色并没有感到任何问题,并表示周崇庆当时只是在演好反串的角色,而且他所扮演的人物并具贬损意味,只是在描绘一个“普通人”的角色,如家庭主妇或是工人。 指基层领导反映广告未冒犯印裔 她补充道,针对此事,询问大多数基层领导,包括印度人,均不认为广告具有冒犯之意。 傅海燕表示,NETS广告是想向公众传达一个讯息,即付费平台能够为所有人使用,无论是何种背景、种族的人。 不过,针对网红“美丽求求你“的视频,她则认为“是不同的问题”,因为视频内,网红使用了污秽的语言,指责了广告里的艺人不敏感。 她也解释,网红“美丽求求你”也曾出现取笑华人新年的视频,这样的做法也被视为是不敏感的行为。 “美丽求求你讽刺华人新年” “如果我们放过视频,不采取任何行动,在各族间盛怒之下,万一华人也开始采取类似的侮辱性视频,这对种族间的关系又会产生什么影响?”她解释。…

马国民调:希盟政府获67巴仙选民满意

根据马国默迪卡民调中心,针对希盟政府执政百日进行民调,显示希盟政府仍获得67巴仙的满意度,其中,依据族群分别为79巴仙华裔、89巴仙印裔、62巴仙沙巴、砂拉越土著,以及58巴仙的巫裔选民支持。 该民调是从本月7日至14日,透过电话采访了1160位21岁以上,来自马来亚半岛、沙巴及砂拉越的选民。 询及马国是否正朝着正确轨道前进,有55巴仙表示认同,25巴仙表示不赞同,20巴仙则感到不确定。但是,有66巴仙受访者对政府经济管理感到满意,56巴仙对国家经济前景感到乐观。 另一方面,民调也显示仍有71巴仙选民对首相敦马哈迪表现感到满意。81巴仙公务员对马哈迪感到满意。 当前有50巴仙选民最关心通货膨胀问题,其次则为肃贪(32巴仙),再来这是捍卫马来主权及各族平等权益(21巴仙)。对于一马公司议题和前首相纳吉涉贪议题,分别仅占7及6巴仙。 “需更多时间落实” 敦马哈迪坦言,竞选宣言有些承诺需要更多时间落实,在大选前把他们放入宣言时,希盟也未料到能成功变天。 “但是当我们接管政府时,发现国家状况比我们预想的糟,前朝政府借了太多钱。”他说,致使现任政府在一个很严峻的环境下工作。 不过,他表示希盟政府仍会兑现诺言,他深知若无法兑现,将面对各界反贪,包括遭到反对党挞伐,导致在下届选举丢失政权。 不过,他有信心希盟拟定的大部分竞选宣言可在五年内完成。 另一方面,副首相旺阿兹莎则为希盟政府百日成绩打圆场,认为尽管无法兑现所有百日承诺,但并不需要公开道歉。 他强调,在10项百日承诺中,有两项已经兑现,即落实妇女公积金和废除消费税。