The $78,000 medical bill of Mr Thomas Lukose has been waived by the hospital group which runs Gleneagles Hospital.

It was earlier reported that Mr Thomas who was working as a security guard at Gleneagles Hospital, suffered a heart attack during work on 12 September and was taken to the hospital’s emergency department immediately.

While his family wanted to transfer him to the National Heart Centre Singapore (NHCS) because his insurance only covers him for subsidised care but there were two things that prevented them from doing so. One, Mr Lukose was in critical condition, therefore, he was put on a ventilator and needed intensive care and two, NHCS had no spare bed in its intensive care unit, so there was no possibility of an immediate transfer. Mr Thomas was later billed by the hospital for a staggering sum of $78,000

The spokesman of NHCS said that the doctors from Gleneagles Hospital and NHCS discussed Mr Lukose’s medical condition on 13 September morning and felt that Mr Lukose was too ill to undergo immediate surgery, although this could be considered later.

He said that NHCS then made arrangements to take over his care and a bed was offered to Mr Lukose on 15 September. “We had available surgical slots and would have been able to perform the surgery,” he added.

However, Dr Sriram Shankar, the cardiothoracic surgeon who treated Mr Lukose, said that Mr Lukose was critically ill and it would have been risky to transfer”, adding that with such condition, treatment needed to be expedited.

Dr Shankar then operated on him at Gleneagles Hospital on 16 September. Mr Lukose had open-heart surgery with three coronary artery bypass grafts. The doctor noted that he made an excellent, uneventful recovery.

Though Dr Shankar did not charge for his services but at the end, Mr Lukose, who is now at home, has been billed for $78,000 by the hospital. His work insurance will cover $13,500, however, the rest has to come from his medical insurance, Medisave or cash.

The crowdfunding appeal raised more than $24,000 as of Friday morning (13 October).

A commentary by The Straits Times senior health correspondent Salma Khalik was published on Wednesday, suggested to the hospital to consider waiving the remainder of Mr Lukose’s hospital bill not covered by insurance and MediShield Life.

Mr Phua Tien Beng, the acting chief executive officer for the Singapore operations division of Parkway Pantai, which Gleneagles is under, wrote a letter to the Straits Times and said that Mr Lukose received timely and expert care from Gleneagles’ doctors and staff, and made an excellent recovery.

Responding to the commentary by the ST writer, Mr Phua said, “Having reviewed the case, we have decided that the hospital should cover his outstanding medical bills. It is the right thing to do. We regret the anxiety caused.”

He then announced that Mr Lukose and his family have accepted the offer and have “very generously diverted the money raised through crowdfunding to the next person in need”.

In a comment on the Give.Asia page, which is no longer accepting donations, Mr Lukose’s brother Daniel acknowledged that Gleneagles Hospital chief executive Lee Shen Ming had informed them of the offer, and thanked donors for their generosity.

“For all the donations received, we’ll be donating to the next person in need, and we’ll be updating on this site for future donations. Once again, thank you very much for coming forward to help, and we’re truly blessed and thankful to each and everyone of you,” he said.

Many thanked Gleneagles for the move, saying that it is setting the right example of corporate social responsibility.

Kelvin Foong wrote, “Good decision Parkway Pantai. Although you have every right to continue to bill the patient, you have chosen the humane way to absorb the remaining charges.”

Robert Lim wrote, “Thomas Lukose was very lucky to be at the right time and place to suffer the heart attack. His family must thank God, Gleneagles’ medical team and management for saving and extending his life expectancy. The outcome if he were sent to a public hospital at that critical stage could have been different”

Harry Chia wrote, “Great outcome, Gleneagles done the right thing and security guard’s family made a wonderful gesture. All is well!”

Roger Cassidy Lim wrote, “Thank you for the kind gesture. Humanity is found again.”

Sangha Vandana wrote, “Thanks you and God bless you. A good example of corporate social responsibility.”

Mr Loh Wai Poon appreciate the move by Mr Lakose family who decided to divert the crowdfunding to others in need. He wrote, “Yes, this is the right move! Divert the crowdfunding to others in need is the right thing to do. Give an account of how the fund being distributed to the needy is something lacking in other hard luck news. Do the right thing.”

Mr Derrick Yuen wrote that this is the exact example of how vulnerable lives in Singapore are. He wrote, “This case is very clear of how vulnerable Singapore’s healthcare system really is; and how limited its capacity is to meet some Singaporean’s need. Without premium insurance coverage, some lower income or limited insurance coverage Singaporeans will continue to be vulnerable at times of need.”

Some stated that this is the power of media and wonder if the story would end up this way if only it was not being blown up.

Chee Horng Kai wrote, “Wondering if this news never appeared in any mainstream media will the result still the same? So, it is a sincere move or pressure from?”

 

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

电视论坛与人民互动 网民对财长回答大不满

新加坡财政部长王瑞杰在星期一(2月18日)发布2019年预算案后,他于星期二(2月19日)出席了一个预算案电视论坛,让民众有机会就预算案内容向部长提问。 长约一小时的论坛中,王瑞杰听取民众提出有关各种主题的问题,例如相关的预算案好似一个大选预算案、立国一代配套(Merdeka Generation Package)如何鼓励保持身心健康活跃的生活,以及新加坡的出生率。其他民众也表达了他们对高昂生活费,以及中产阶级缺乏福利保障一事表示担忧。 超过500留言表达不满 有关的电视论坛在亚洲新闻频道(CNA)脸书上直播。留言区充满了网友向部长提出各种项目的问题,以及他们对王瑞杰的回答表示不满。 在亚洲新闻频道(CNA)脸书直播过程中,共获得超过500个留言,许多人质问公积金的提款年龄。失望的是,有关的问题并没有得到解答,因为并没有现场观众对王瑞杰提问此事。 质疑消费税增加 在发表2019预算案时,王瑞杰表示政府计划在未来数年,将消费税从7巴仙调高至9巴仙。针对这个事项,一位市民提问道,政府是否能吸纳食物等必需品的消费税。王瑞杰回答说:“在我们推出消费税前,我们已经非常仔细地研究过这个项目。最近这个课题再次引起争议后,我又在研究了一遍”。 然而网民对此回答并没有感到很满意,他们质疑消费税的调涨,甚至呼吁废除消费税。 财案没照顾中产阶级 除此之外,有民众表示新加坡的生活费持续增长,他问财政部长,政府是否会采取一些措施,帮助没有被纳入立国一代配套的群体。王瑞杰指出,政府需要保持成本低廉,这是很重要的,而且可以通过很多方式来达到这一目标,例如拥有一个开放和具有竞争力的系统,来自世界各地的进口货物,以及保持一个强壮的经济体。…

Najip Ali might be taken out as judge from popular Malaysian TV show

Singaporean comedian Najip Ali might to be taken out as judge from…

Company fined $44,500 for unauthorised excavation works and damage to water main

Construction company Megastone Holdings Pte Ltd was fined $44,500 for carrying out…

Mediacorp star’s husband removed as CEO of POKKA International

The Chinese news media broke the news on Wed (26 Sep) that…