The $78,000 medical bill of Mr Thomas Lukose has been waived by the hospital group which runs Gleneagles Hospital.

It was earlier reported that Mr Thomas who was working as a security guard at Gleneagles Hospital, suffered a heart attack during work on 12 September and was taken to the hospital’s emergency department immediately.

While his family wanted to transfer him to the National Heart Centre Singapore (NHCS) because his insurance only covers him for subsidised care but there were two things that prevented them from doing so. One, Mr Lukose was in critical condition, therefore, he was put on a ventilator and needed intensive care and two, NHCS had no spare bed in its intensive care unit, so there was no possibility of an immediate transfer. Mr Thomas was later billed by the hospital for a staggering sum of $78,000

The spokesman of NHCS said that the doctors from Gleneagles Hospital and NHCS discussed Mr Lukose’s medical condition on 13 September morning and felt that Mr Lukose was too ill to undergo immediate surgery, although this could be considered later.

He said that NHCS then made arrangements to take over his care and a bed was offered to Mr Lukose on 15 September. “We had available surgical slots and would have been able to perform the surgery,” he added.

However, Dr Sriram Shankar, the cardiothoracic surgeon who treated Mr Lukose, said that Mr Lukose was critically ill and it would have been risky to transfer”, adding that with such condition, treatment needed to be expedited.

Dr Shankar then operated on him at Gleneagles Hospital on 16 September. Mr Lukose had open-heart surgery with three coronary artery bypass grafts. The doctor noted that he made an excellent, uneventful recovery.

Though Dr Shankar did not charge for his services but at the end, Mr Lukose, who is now at home, has been billed for $78,000 by the hospital. His work insurance will cover $13,500, however, the rest has to come from his medical insurance, Medisave or cash.

The crowdfunding appeal raised more than $24,000 as of Friday morning (13 October).

A commentary by The Straits Times senior health correspondent Salma Khalik was published on Wednesday, suggested to the hospital to consider waiving the remainder of Mr Lukose’s hospital bill not covered by insurance and MediShield Life.

Mr Phua Tien Beng, the acting chief executive officer for the Singapore operations division of Parkway Pantai, which Gleneagles is under, wrote a letter to the Straits Times and said that Mr Lukose received timely and expert care from Gleneagles’ doctors and staff, and made an excellent recovery.

Responding to the commentary by the ST writer, Mr Phua said, “Having reviewed the case, we have decided that the hospital should cover his outstanding medical bills. It is the right thing to do. We regret the anxiety caused.”

He then announced that Mr Lukose and his family have accepted the offer and have “very generously diverted the money raised through crowdfunding to the next person in need”.

In a comment on the Give.Asia page, which is no longer accepting donations, Mr Lukose’s brother Daniel acknowledged that Gleneagles Hospital chief executive Lee Shen Ming had informed them of the offer, and thanked donors for their generosity.

“For all the donations received, we’ll be donating to the next person in need, and we’ll be updating on this site for future donations. Once again, thank you very much for coming forward to help, and we’re truly blessed and thankful to each and everyone of you,” he said.

Many thanked Gleneagles for the move, saying that it is setting the right example of corporate social responsibility.

Kelvin Foong wrote, “Good decision Parkway Pantai. Although you have every right to continue to bill the patient, you have chosen the humane way to absorb the remaining charges.”

Robert Lim wrote, “Thomas Lukose was very lucky to be at the right time and place to suffer the heart attack. His family must thank God, Gleneagles’ medical team and management for saving and extending his life expectancy. The outcome if he were sent to a public hospital at that critical stage could have been different”

Harry Chia wrote, “Great outcome, Gleneagles done the right thing and security guard’s family made a wonderful gesture. All is well!”

Roger Cassidy Lim wrote, “Thank you for the kind gesture. Humanity is found again.”

Sangha Vandana wrote, “Thanks you and God bless you. A good example of corporate social responsibility.”

Mr Loh Wai Poon appreciate the move by Mr Lakose family who decided to divert the crowdfunding to others in need. He wrote, “Yes, this is the right move! Divert the crowdfunding to others in need is the right thing to do. Give an account of how the fund being distributed to the needy is something lacking in other hard luck news. Do the right thing.”

Mr Derrick Yuen wrote that this is the exact example of how vulnerable lives in Singapore are. He wrote, “This case is very clear of how vulnerable Singapore’s healthcare system really is; and how limited its capacity is to meet some Singaporean’s need. Without premium insurance coverage, some lower income or limited insurance coverage Singaporeans will continue to be vulnerable at times of need.”

Some stated that this is the power of media and wonder if the story would end up this way if only it was not being blown up.

Chee Horng Kai wrote, “Wondering if this news never appeared in any mainstream media will the result still the same? So, it is a sincere move or pressure from?”

 

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

热水“浇死”五岁儿 医生:母亲或受心理疾病影响

一名母亲被指控朝五岁的儿子倒热水,最后导致儿子活活被烫伤而死亡,但是心理医生表示这可能是因为心理病所导致的。 法庭于昨日(11月27日)的听证会上指出,阿姿琳(Azlin Arujunah,27岁)与丈夫利兹万(Ridzuan Mega Abdul Rahman,27岁)因谋杀罪而接受审判,指他们有意朝儿子倒热水,导致后者昏倒后,于2016年10月在医院中过世。 误将肢体虐待当做惩罚 控方心理医生拉杰什(Jacob Rajesh)博士在法庭上指出,阿姿琳在年轻时就学会了这种惩罚方式。“从小就受到肢体虐待,绝对是一个心灵创伤。这些肢体虐待在他们长大后,就会用在自己的后代身上。” 他补充说,这可能是导致阿姿琳采取类似惩罚方式的其中一个因素。 当被询及为何阿姿琳在给予警方和心理医生,有关虐待行为的口供上有所出入时,拉杰什表示,被告将某些罪行归咎在其丈夫身上。 他指出,阿姿琳的口供导致她在案件中处于不利面,因为她希望夫妻中有一人获得轻判,能够更早出狱去照顾他们的孩子。…

集中资源 重整运营措施 思捷将关闭亚洲65店铺

服饰品牌思捷环球(Esprit)宣布,该公司将会终止在中国大陆的业务,同时将关闭56间设立于亚洲的零售店铺,包括在新加坡、马来西亚、台湾、香港和澳门的分店。 据香港经济日报指出,思捷环球将关闭店铺是为重组举措的一部分,旨在集中资源并重整运营措施,以便有效、且高效率地应对冠状病毒全球肆虐所带来的挑战。 即将面临关闭命运的56间店铺,截止3月底的九个月内,所带来的收入有约2.67亿元,不到总收入的4巴仙,因此预计会在本财政年度前,即六月月杪前关闭。 该集团建议在关闭店铺后,将专注于欧洲的核心市场,并继续中国的合资公司业务以及亚洲的批发业务和许可权业务。 随着店铺关闭、资产和存货减值、员工遣散费等一次性特殊成本,思捷环球预计将耗费1.5亿元至2亿元。 该集团也公布了截止3月底的财年第三季颖运输局,上季收入跌了23.7亿元,即25巴仙,而首三季收入则跌了81.3亿元,即18巴仙。 文告中指出,重组期间,集团董事会执行主席和集团行政总裁停止收取薪酬,其他管理层则减薪,包括行政管理员减薪35巴仙、高级副总裁和副总裁减25巴仙、非执行董事或独立非执行董事则减两成的董事袍金。 该集团目前也正在为即将关闭以及无法达到预计成果的店铺寻找各项措施,包括使用政府的援助措施,以便减少租金等消费。

News of Lee Kuan Yew’s critical condition send media flocking for information

Over the past few hours, many of our Facebook timelines, Twitter feeds,…

Filipino on S-Pass: We are humans who have families to support

Singapore Business Review (SBR) published an article last Mon (‘Singapore’s foreign workers…