It has been reported by Straits Times that a security guard, Mr Thomas Lukose, suffered a heart attack at Gleneagles Hospital and he was billed by the hospital for a staggering sum of $78,000. His family now appealing for funds from the public to help to pay off his bill.

According to the Straits Times, the man was on night duty on 12 September as security guard when he collapsed and was taken to the hospital’s emergency department immediately.

While his family wanted to transfer him to the National Heart Centre Singapore (NHCS) because his insurance only covers him for subsidised care but there were two things that prevented them from doing so. One, Mr Lukose was in critical condition, therefore, he was put on a ventilator and needed intensive care and two, NHCS had no spare bed in its intensive care unit, so there was no possibility of an immediate transfer.

Chief executive officer of Gleneagles Hospital (GEH), Dr Lee Suen Ming, said, “After the first transfer request was unsuccessful, doctors at GEH proceeded with the patient’s treatment plan to ensure the best clinical outcomes possible for the patient.”

NHCS spokesman told ST that the transfer could not be effected immediately as there was no available bed in its CCU (coronary care unit) then.

The spokesman then said that the doctors from Gleneagles Hospital and NHCS discussed Mr Lukose’s medical condition on 13 September morning and felt that Mr Lukose was too ill to undergo immediate surgery, although this could be considered later.

He said that NHCS then made arrangements to take over his care and a bed was offered to Mr Lukose on 15 September. “We had available surgical slots and would have been able to perform the surgery,” he added.

However, Dr Sriram Shankar, the cardiothoracic surgeon who treated Mr Lukose, said that Mr Lukose was critically ill and it would have been risky to transfer”, adding that with such condition, treatment needed to be expedited.

Dr Shankar then operated on him at Gleneagles Hospital on 16 September. Mr Lukose had open-heart surgery with three coronary artery bypass grafts. The doctor noted that he made an excellent, uneventful recovery.

Though Dr Shankar did not charge for his services but at the end, Mr Lukose, who is now at home, has been billed for $78,000 by the hospital. His work insurance will cover $13,500, however, the rest has to come from his medical insurance, Medisave or cash.

The appeal on the website wrote, “We have been trying to get him transferred to SGH (Singapore General Hospital) where the cost will be lower, however the efforts have not been successful as there isn’t an ICU (intensive care unit) slot available, and it will be risky to keep waiting any longer. Therefore, we have no choice but to go ahead with operation at Gleneagles.”

So far, the crowdfunding website shows that over $24,500 has been donated in light of its goal of $40,000. However, Dr Lee said that the hospital is pursuing all avenues to alleviate his financial burden.

A reader of ST, Lau Eric, commented that he experienced the same thing as what Mr Lukose went through. “I know exactly how it is like, as I had similar experience four months ago, though not an immediate life threatening scenario like that of Mr Thomas Lukose,” he wrote.

The man stated that sometime in early June, he had an excruciating back pain. “I had already got a referral from the polyclinic to KTPH. But the problem is, the earliest available appointment slot was in August. As I wanted subsidised care, I had intended to bear with the pain & wait,” he recalled.

However, he wrote that one week later it got so bad that he could neither sleep nor move without this extreme pain. “With hardly any other options I could think of, I sought to see a private specialist (which luckily under my employment, their are “some low end co-payment coverage”),” he wrote.

“Cut short the long story, I ended up with a Mount Elizabeth bill of $34,000! And that’s not inclusive of the post hospitalization cost!” he wrote. Mr Lau noted that he has Medisave, Medisave life plus integrated plan and company’s insurance plan, and yet he ended up paying around $10,000 in cash plus deduction from his Medisave account. “The sore point of mine is that I had intended to have subsidised care but it wasn’t available to me when I need. Something has to be done, not today not tomorrow but yesterday!” he stressed.

Speaking to medical professionals on the issue, they shared that the lack of hospital beds is not a new issue faced by the public hospitals. TOC understands that SGH would likely have a bed open in its ICU out of about six ICU beds but reserved for its own in-house patients. Given that the patient is already in an ICU, SGH would likely not want to take in the patient.

Even in the case that there is no ICU in SGH, if the hospital had called 995 for emergency service, he might be sent to Raffles Hospital where he can enjoy subsidised care and pay rates as in public hospital.

A question raised from this incident is whether the public hospitals have sufficient ICU beds to cope with the demand of the local populace or citizens are just expected to pay huge sums of medical bills, should there be no ICU beds for them in public hospitals.

Update: The family has been informed that the medical bills will be covered by Gleneagles and will not need to raise funds for his medical fees any more. They note that the donations that they have received will be donated to the next person in need and thank all those who have came forward to help.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

“怪”标题标签精神压力女佣 客工层层剥削   媒体视而不见

上月26日,《联合晚报》刊登一则25岁女佣闹跳楼的新闻。报导中描述事件发生在蔡厝港地区的组屋,指出这名女佣爬出八楼单位的窗外,站在墙檐,惊动拯救队人员到场,拯救企图自杀的女佣。 据该报导,记者采访女佣的雇主陈楚萍,后者称女佣名为卡斯罗,来自印尼,在六周前刚来工作,开工不到两天就出现怪异举动,常望着窗外发呆,且只喝水不进食。雇主告知记者,以为女佣还在适应新环境,也耐心教导她如何做家务。 女佣不谙英语,为此雇主以谷歌翻译和女佣沟通。“某次,她看见女佣连洗个碗都有气没力,好意提点女佣,岂料女佣竟趴在沙发上哭了一个多小时。雇主打电话向代理求助,沟通后女佣还是不开心,独自躲在房间角落里缀泣。” 事发当天只有20多岁的雇主儿子和女佣在家,女佣爬出窗外,儿子也尝试劝他入屋并马上报警。警员和民防队员到场,灾难拯救人员则攀绳而下从窗外把女佣就回屋内。惟女佣在企图自杀罪名下被捕。 该篇报导并未引述专业拯救人员或心理医生意见,但却打着:《怪女佣开工两天不进食  第六周竟闹跳楼》的标题,引起维权份子范国瀚不满,谴责该标题太刻薄,女佣面对的是精神压力,但是编辑却设误导性的标题,把她描述成神经古怪、没有理性之人。 “加深对精神患者刻板印象” “精神健康是重要的社会问题,这种故事只是进一步加深对精神衰弱患者的偏见和刻板印象。” 《联合早报》也被批评,以耸动标题来骗取读者阅读量,却对社会不同群体缺乏敏感度。 针对有网民评论,常常有女佣闹跳楼,谎称被“鬼上身”,欺瞒雇主以便能早点离开新加坡,范国瀚表示不认同,他认为这种说法并没有考虑到这些家庭女佣面对的情绪和心态,“是不是有无法跨越的苦难?他是不是精神上有很多压力,或者有不敢说出来的恐惧?” 他补充,遽下断语之前,媒体必须推究事理,而不是急于责怪工人。 长工时、不给假日,当女佣奴隶…

PSP conducts first walkabout of the year to West Coast GRC, Dr Tan welcomed warmly at his old ward

On Sunday (12 Jan), the Progress Singapore Party (PSP) went on its…

The case of Roslan bin Bakar

This piece was first published on We Believe In Second Chances. Kirsten…