Several to-be-participants of the sit-in protest at Hong Lim Park have issued a statement on their views on the process of the elected presidency and also their concerns over the comments made over Mdm Halimah Yacob’s appointment as the Elected President being the sole candidate who received the Certificate of Eligibility from the Presidential Election Committee.

Below is their statement in full and the link for their statement.

On 13 September 2017, Mdm Halimah Yacob was declared Singapore’s 8th President.

In any other circumstance, the election of our first Malay woman President—who had also previously served as the deputy secretary-general of the National Trades Union Congress, and Speaker of Parliament, amongst other capacities—would have been celebrated as a progressive step for Singapore society.

However, the recent changes to the rules of the Presidential Election have generated disappointment and outrage.

We are aware that discontent is being expressed through a sit-in called Silent Sit-In Protest #NotMyPresident that will be held at Hong Lim Park’s Speakers’ Corner on 16 September (Saturday) at 4.30pm. This sends a clear signal that there is a significant proportion of Singaporeans who regard the so-called “hiatus-triggered model” as deeply undemocratic and politically motivated.

To that end, we will be attending this sit-in as an expression of sharing in the disappointment and outrage of the attendees and other Singaporeans.

However, we would like to clarify and urge that our disappointment and outrage should be pointed specifically to the political process and not towards Mdm Halimah Yacob’s character.

That is,

  1.  We reject the “hiatus-triggered model” as undemocratic and degrading of the elected office
  2.  We are disappointed with the Presidential Election Committee’s direct decision to disqualify the two other potential candidates, and indirect declaration of a walkover
  3.  We are against the recent tightening of the eligibility criteria for private sector candidates which disqualifies various competent citizens from serving the office
  4.  We question Mdm Halimah Yacob’s presidency to be sufficiently independent given the functions of the Elected President, and her affiliation to the People’s Action Party (PAP) terminated only in August 2017

In addition to these objections against the political process:

  1.   We do not wish to question Mdm Halimah Yacob’s qualifications, capabilities, gender, or racial identity as relevant to her execution of duties in the office.
  2. We disapprove of any rejection of her presidency which resorts to character assassinations, and/ or questioning of her identity, as short-sighted and unfair.
  3.  We are expressing our reservations regarding the hashtag #NotMyPresident as it might be used to make attacks on Mdm Halimah Yacob’s character, and suggest that we instead focus on the unfair political processes behind this walkover.

We, the signatories, recognise the great outpour of feelings and ask that it be directed to its source: the government’s undemocratic proposals and failure to consult the Singaporean people on matters of national importance. Any accusations made towards Mdm Halimah Yacob distract from the broader political forces behind her election.

With these concerns in mind, we urge everyone to attend the Silent Sit-In Protest as a means of registering our frustrations and disappointments. If you are a Singaporean or Permanent Resident (PR) who would like to express solidarity with our principles, please indicate your name on the following Google form: https://goo.gl/forms/MVNuvqxC5xoLUsm62

[toggle title=”Signatories”] Shawn Hoo
Anthea Chua
Yogesh Tulsi
Rachel Ooi
Swarnima Sircar
Saza Faradilla
Kwok Yingchen
Jiang Haolie
Paul Jerusalem
Jay Wong Cai Jie
Tsoi Sau Yee
Natalie Sutanto
Herman Lim
Gilbert Goh
Benny Phang
Kwan Zhaoting
Neo Albert
Salina Bte Rahiman
Abdul Aziz Bin Hussain
Sasha Aman
Koh Wei Jie
Joy Yang
Ng Qi Siang
Hellen Sebestian
Tan JY
Yap Xin Ran
Sharan Kaur Sambhi
Tan Heng Yeng
Tan Hwee Peng
Naomi Lourdesamy
Tan Yan Ru
Muhammad Faris Bin Joraimi
Gabriel Tng
Cephas Tan
Wong Kong Shing
Rakesh Prabhakaran
Elsie Lee
Siying
Arunima Sircar
Mock Tian Qi Annika

[/toggle]

 

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

高庭展延工人党市镇会上诉案

盛港集选区议员何廷儒,已在本月10日代表盛港市镇会上书高庭,要求展延审理工人党市镇会诉讼的诉辩双方上诉。 何廷儒援引政府7月底颁布2020年市镇会(声明)令相关段落,指出上诉案聆讯和任何裁决,将对盛港市镇会具有约束力,也影响该市镇会需捍卫的盛港居民权益。 为此盛港市镇会采取审慎态度,寻求法律咨询包括是否应申请介入诉讼、和应采取的法律立场等。为此,何廷儒要求诉讼延后六周审理。 高庭早期按是通知诉辩双方的律师,上诉案将定在17日开审。 尽管高庭已在去年10月11日作出判决,不过阿裕尼后港市镇会(AHTC)代表律师,在今年5月向法庭申请,修改针对工人党毕丹星和其他四人的诉状内容。不过此举遭到毕丹星等人的代表律师的反对。

本地作家提醒政府:我国30年前已有变性手术!

本地诗人、作家黄毅圣表示,新加坡政府自1970年开始已接受性别转换(gender transitioning)。 黄毅圣除了是诗人和作家的身份,也是周二(26日)在教育部大楼前为跨性别学生示威抗议的五人之一。 他表示,本地早就已有性别肯定手术(gender-affirming surgery),俗称变性手术,且我国第一例手术于1971年进行,由著名妇产科医生Shan S. Ratnam执刀。 根据国家图书管理局的资料显示,Ratnam医生30年内都在研究变性手术,堪称这方面专家。 为此,黄毅圣表示,“换句话说,我们已正式接受变性手术有半世纪之久,所以这不是任何政府机构对跨性别歧视的理由。” 黄毅圣也强调,有关示威抗议不仅仅是针对跨性别学生,而是为全体学生着想,包括对自己性别认同存疑的异性学生。 即使是异性学生,他们也受困于社会上对男女二分化的固化概念,经常因为“男性化”(masculinity)和“女性化”(feminity)的行为而遭受到霸凌和羞辱。 黄毅圣认为,若能够更接受跨性别亦有助于异性学生。…

New HDB portal to be introduced to allow homeowners to advertise and list their own flats – what will happen to property agents?

Starting from Wednesday (11 September), first-time Housing and Development Board (HDB) flat…

BBQ ticketing controversy – Australian paper reports, PA declines comment

Australian newspaper, The Sydney Morning Herald (SMH), has reported on the controversy…