Just yesterday, Leslie Chew, cartoonist of the hiatus Demon-cratic Studio posted two screenshots of a poll that someone sent him. It was said to be an opinion poll from the Public Service Division (PSD) under the Prime Minister’s Office (PMO) to poll civil/public servants for their opinions on the Lee Family dispute.
Those who have been following the on-going Lee family saga would be familiar with the accusations made by the children of late Lee Kuan Yew, Dr Lee Weiling (LWL) and Mr Lee Hsien Yang (LHY) upon their elder brother, Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong with allegations of him abusing his powers and position as PM for personal agenda. Both of them issued a joint statement on 14 June delivering harsh criticisms of PM Lee, saying that they are disturbed by the character, conduct, motives and leadership of their brother and the role of his wife, Ho Ching. PM Lee has denied all allegations made against him and is set to address the Parliament on 3 July on this matter.
According to the screenshot, the opinion poll is entitled, “Poll on Lee Family Dispute” and is issued by the PSD Engage.
The poll shows three questions that relate to the ongoing saga between the Lee siblings.  One asks the public servant’s view on the matter, the second asks if the incident has affected his or her confidence in the integrity and impartiality of the public institutions, the third asks if it is appropriate for the Prime Minister to address the issue in Parliament. It is unknown how many questions are there in total.


Chew who shared the poll, wrote,

“Is it not an abuse of public resources for the PM to use the PMO to conduct the poll? If the PM wants some opinion about his family matters, shouldn’t he be using his own money to hire professional survey firms to conduct the poll instead of abusing taxpayers funded resources like this?
Is it not a waste of taxpayers’ monies paid to civil/public servants to be spending their working time participating in polls of the PM’s personal & private family matter instead of using the said time doing the actual job they are paid for – serving the people?”

Public Service Division confirms conduct of poll
PSD has confirmed in a statement on Tuesday with media that such a poll was conducted. PSD and is quoted to have said that “the allegations made go beyond private matters and extend to the conduct and integrity of the Government and our public institutions”.
It further stated, “We are polling public officers to understand their sentiments on this issue as it involves the integrity of our public institutions, of which they are an important part.” and it periodically polls public officers on issues that matter to them as part of “stakeholder engagement”.
What is the poll used for?
As with the “secret committee” formed to deliberate the government decision on the property at 38 Oxley Road, what is this poll meant for? Even if you would have an overwhelming response from the public service officers that the whole incident is a negative affair to Singapore and that the Prime Minister should not be using the Parliament to address his personal affairs, what will PSD do? Call for an impeachment of the PM?
Given that this poll is based on invitation only and the allegation of abuse of powers by PM Lee, would anyone participating in the poll provide their response in a truthful manner?
Or is this poll meant to provide positive figures for PM Lee or other Ministers to present in Parliament in this coming 3 July to show that the government suffered no damage to confidence on its public institution due to allegations of abuse of authority?

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

曾在凯德集团共事 惟总检察署称黄鲁胜与廖无私交

廖文良指控前女佣巴蒂偷窃案,在上周获得高庭法官平反。法官陈成安判词,点出廖文良一家举报女佣偷窃,背后动机有疑点。对此,总检察署早前表示,将再研究判词决定是否采取进一步行动。 事实上,当廖文良还是凯德集团总裁的时候,现任总检察长黄鲁胜,亦再集团内担任董事成员。 然而,如今总检察署澄清,黄鲁胜和廖文良并没有私交,出于个人理由,黄鲁胜已回避此案,交由由副总检察长哈里古玛,负责检讨工作。 总检察署也指,黄鲁胜在2006年1月就离开凯德集团董事局,至今日和廖文良也无私交。 据凯德集团誌期2001年的年度报告,介绍黄鲁胜实在2000年11月20日加入凯德集团,当时也是该集团审计委员会成员。至于廖文良也是在同年11月,获推举为集团总裁。这意味着,他们在凯德集团也至少共事了五年。 回溯2017年7月,当欧思礼路故居风波闹上国会,时任工人党秘书长刘程强曾质疑,现任总检察长黄鲁胜,过去就曾是李显龙先生的私人律师,协助处理总理和弟妹纠纷。然而,他针对李光耀遗嘱事宜,向政府和内阁提供建议,这又算不算利益冲突? 当时,时任财政部兼律政部高级政务部长英兰妮,回应当局是经过严格筛选,选择黄鲁胜任总检察长,还咨询了大法官、公共服务署主席和前总检察长的意见。

总理起诉本社总编许渊臣

李显龙总理 起诉本社总编许渊臣。 本社总编许渊臣,在今午3时51分,收到代表总理李显龙的达文星律师楼( Davinder Singh Chambers LLC)寄来的原告诉状和法庭传票。 法庭传票,请许渊臣在下月15日,出席原告和被告双方的审前会议。 诉状中对本社英语站发表的有关文章提出异议,指该文章作出不实和无根据,并且贬低和诋毁总理。 本周日,李总理新闻秘书张俪霖,代表总理向本社总编许渊臣发函,指本社英语站在8月15日刊登的一篇评论,复述针对总理的不实指控,要求本社撤下并在三日内道歉。 对此,许渊臣在昨日致函总理答复。在信中,许渊臣强调,自己始终都是问责、透明和法治的忠实信徒;并认为有关评论文章不含诽谤性,而是根据可能对事件知情的总理家人此前发表的公开声明,也有鉴于涉及公共利益问题,为了能避免造成疑虑,只能重新复述总理弟妹曾说过的话。 对于总理新闻秘书信函第八段提出的要求,即立即移除有关文章,并在本月4日前无条件作出道歉,以及承诺不在《网络公民》刊登类似的指控,许渊臣则婉拒了这些要求。 许渊臣答复总理完整信函

Save lives and not save costs, says SPP Chairman Jose Raymond

In response to a series of photos which have been posted online…