Deputy Prime Minister Teo Chee Hean has issued a statement in response to an opinion piece by Han Fook Kwang, editor-at-large for Straits Times.
Straits Times earlier published Mr Han’s opinion piece, “Three key issues in the Lee vs Lee saga” on Wednesday. The piece asks three pertinent questions in regards to the on-going Lee family saga that have intrigued both local and international community.

  • How involved ministers should be on the issue of the 38 Oxley Road dispute and suggested that the ministers should have stayed clear of the dispute over the will.
  • Do Singaporeans want to know and to participate in the discussion of the saga, given the accusations field by Prime Minister’s siblings of him abusing public powers to achieve his personal agenda.
  • How people would want to move forward, beyond the record and achievements of their past leaders.

In his response, DPM Teo addressed to the question of the minister’s involvement by saying that the issue of what to do with 38 Oxley Road cannot simply be left in the hands of the Founders’ Memorial Committee and the Cabinet of the day and its ministers cannot avoid taking responsibility for making the required decisions on matters where the public interest is involved.
In April 2015 after the passing of Lee Kuan Yew, PM Lee Hsien Loong announced that the Founders’ Memorial Committee would be chaired by Mr Lee Tzu Yang to gather views from the public, and conceptualise a memorial for Singapore’s founding fathers.
While DPM Teo claims that the committee was formed by him, it is unknown when the ministerial committee was formed and whether was it formed after the three siblings had the agreement for the property to be sold to Mr Lee Hsien Yang, so as to allow him to decide on what to do with the property at 38 Oxley Road.
PM Lee has made a public statement on 19 June to apologise for the dispute between him and his siblings and stated that he will make a ministerial statement to refute the allegations made against him and will subject himself to questioning by the Members of Parliament on 3 July with party whip lifted for his party.
Below is DPM Teo’s statement in full

Mr Han Fook Kwang in his article “Three key issues in the Lee vs Lee saga” asks about the need to set up a Ministerial Committee. Setting up a Ministerial Committee to study or work on issues is part of normal Cabinet working processes. Even boards of companies set up committees to look into specific issues. He also asked why the issue of what to do with 38 Oxley Road cannot simply be left in the hands of the Founders’ Memorial Committee. Ultimately, it is the Government of the day which has to be responsible for making a decision on the property as this is where the powers reside under the law, specifically the Preservation of Monuments Act and the Planning Act in this case. Mr Han himself acknowledges this. It is therefore incumbent on Cabinet to consider and decide on the issues, and I have decided to set up a committee to assist Cabinet to do so. Cabinet cannot outsource decision-making. But this does not preclude public consultations or the involvement of some memorial committee at an appropriate time. Indeed members of the public have already written in offering suggestions.
Prime Minister Lee has recused himself from government decisions on the property. No decision is required now as Dr Lee Wei Ling continues to live in the house.
Whoever makes a recommendation, the public or some memorial committee, and when Cabinet eventually makes a decision, founding Prime Minister Mr Lee’s thinking is an important factor which we would all want to take into account. The committee invited views from the siblings to understand Mr Lee Kuan Yew’s thinking on this matter. It is only proper that the committee seek their views.  Indeed, the Committee had to, since the siblings themselves told us they had different views, and challenged each other’s interpretations of Mr Lee’s wishes. All views were given voluntarily, including those in the form of statutory declarations. Where there were different views, clarifications were sought including the offer for them to be made as statutory declarations. As I have said, the interest of the Committee in Mr Lee’s will is confined to helping us understand his thinking on the matter. This process was conducted through correspondence, and out of the public eye until it was brought out onto a public platform. We should be clear that the difference of views did not arise because there was a Ministerial committee. We still hope that differences of views on private matters can be resolved within the family. But ultimately, the Cabinet of the day and its ministers cannot avoid taking responsibility for making the required decisions on matters where the public interest is involved, and due process is required. Mr Lee Kuan Yew himself understood this and would have expected the government to do so.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

SDCF has strengthened support for mentally distressed recruits following NSF suicide last year

Support for new recruits who need more help in adjusting to life…

Leisure Park Mall bans “all NDP uniform personnel” from entry

A notice by the “management” of the Leisure Park Kallang mall is…

Safe, safe, city, or, O Mr Kishore Mahbubani!

Say it often enough, loudly enough, and strangely, it becomes actual enough, .

冒牌专才费雷拉 疑涉泄露1.4万艾滋病患个资

昨日,卫生部宣布国内医疗体系再度爆出严重病患个资外泄资料,这次是1万4200名艾滋病患个资被人公开上网,卫生部长颜金勇为此道歉。 根据卫生部文告,警方是在22日通知卫生部,而相信涉及泄露艾滋病患个资的,正是曾在2017年被控诈欺、欺骗公务员、拥毒和造假文凭的“冒牌专才”费雷拉(Mikhy Farrera-Brochez )。 费雷拉是在2007年和我国医生吕德祥(译音)相识,在2008年1月至2016年6月,持工作准证,到我国和吕德祥同居。 他的37岁医生男友吕德祥,为包庇有身为艾滋病带原者的费雷拉,被指在2008年3月20日和2013年11月29日,以自己的血液样本偷龙转凤瞒过人力部,让后者得以通过就业准证申请。 为了获得就业准证,费雷拉需通过医疗检查。于是在2008年三月,费雷拉假装到吕德祥诊所抽血,吕德祥则把自己的血液试管贴上费雷拉的名字,让费雷拉医检过关。 至于费雷拉,凭借着造假文凭,成功瞒过人力资源部和淡马锡理工学院长达八年,他甚至获得淡马锡理工学院“赏识”,获准在院内开设儿童心理诊所提供咨询服务。 自诩“天才神童” ”假专才“费雷拉在2010年接受媒体访问时,自诩”天才神童“,声称自己在三岁时就能通晓希伯来、西班牙和英语。 他告诉记者其母亲特蕾莎金,是英国有名的儿童青少心理学、儿童神经学和天才科学和数学教育学者。但是随着他在2016年因拥毒被捕,英国媒体《独立报》决定调查费雷拉身世背景,结果踢爆费雷拉的母亲纯属虚构。 2013年,人力部接到举报指费雷拉是艾滋病带原者,要取消他的准证。费雷拉辩称是被诬告的,于是在同年11月22日,和吕德祥故技重施,再度用吕德祥的血液瞒天过海,避过检验。结果,人力部接到检验报告后,继续让费雷拉保留准证。 二人同居住所搜出吸毒器具…