Singapore tops in medical tourism
I refer to the article “Singapore tops for medical tourism, but rivals catching up quickly” (Straits Times, Jun 6).
Most expensive in Asian countries?
It states that “According to data from a medical tourism index released last month, Singapore was ranked the most attractive among seven Asian countries in terms of “patient experience”, but was also one of the least attractive where costs were concerned.”
Wait long long in public hospitals?
In this connection, there have been several media reports over the years, citing experiences of delays and long waiting periods at public healthcare institutions.
Medical tourism increased?
Should public hospitals be actively promoting medical tourism to foreigners to the tune of, as I understand it, about 850,000 (348,000 in 2007) medical tourists in a year in 2012?
“Fighting” for medical treatment?
So, we do not just have foreigners and PRs literally fighting for stretched public healthcare facilities and capacity in Singapore, but we may also be competing against foreign medical tourists who can pay higher non-subsidised fees (and arguably sometimes may be able to jump the queue – to the detriment of Singaporeans seeking subsidised medical treatment).
Why don’t publish statistics anymore?
As to “Singapore Tourism Board (STB) data shows medical tourism receipts fell to $832 million in 2013, down from $1.1 billion the year before. They rose to $994 million the following year. But since 2015, STB has stopped providing the figure” – why have we stopped providing the statistics?
Public hospitals should stop promoting medical tourism?
Public hospitals should not be in the business of medical tourism, as it erodes the already limited healthcare resources for Singaporeans.