Deputy Attorney-General Hri Kumar Nair said that the High Court could hear former presidential candidate,Dr Tan Cheng Bock’s legal challenge regarding the upcoming Malay-only presidential election in late June, at the pre-trial conference at the High Court on Monday (22 May).
The conference was also attended by Dr Tan’s counsel Chelva Retnam Rajah. However, Dr Tan was not present at Monday’s pre-trial conference.
Reporters heard from both parties that the court also gave direction for the filing of further affidavits.
Earlier this month, Dr Tan has officially announced that the High Court has accepted his application to seek the Court’s determination on whether the piece of legislation – that counts President Wee Kim Wee as the first Elected Presidency term for the purposes of calling the upcoming election a reserved election – is consistent with Singapore’s constitution.
The next presidential election is due to be held in September this year. However, under the recent amendments, a reserved election is set aside by the government for a minority race as no candidate from a particular minority group has been elected as the President after five open elections.
In an earlier press conference on 31 March, Dr Tan urge the Government to explain or refer AGC’s opinion to Court to confirm whether AGC’s advice is in sync with the Commission’s spirit and purpose for having reserved elections.
The government has said that the Attorney General’s Chambers (AGC) advised Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong that 2017 will be the first reserved election. This is based on AGC counting 5 consecutive presidential terms beginning with President Wee Kim Wee.
However, Dr Tan stated that the count should start with Mr Ong Teng Cheong, which would make it four terms since the Republic has had an elected President. Therefore, he stressed that the upcoming presidential polls should be an open election.
Dr Tan also questioned whether AGC’s method of counting is actually in line with the spirit and purpose put forward by the Constitutional Commission for having a reserved election.
Dr Tan who nearly won the election from the People’s Action Party endorsed candidate, Dr Tony Tan back in 2011, losing a mere 0.34% after a recount, also said that if the Government simply accepts AGC’s advice without explaining why they accepted the accuracy of the opinion, he is concerned that the Elected Presidency will always be tainted with the suspicion that the reserved elections of 2017, was introduced to prevent his candidacy.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Why does CNA keep associating Tan Jee Say with SDP?

by: Ravi Philemon/ I was watching Channel NewsAsia’s (CNA) ‘AM Live!’ and…

AG Seeks costs against vellama

PRESS RELEASE Private Citizen Could be Ordered to Absorb Substantial Court Costs…

奥南路名源起咯拉拉欧南节? 黄子明博士纠正:与爪哇商人Onan bin Rajidin有关

本月11日,《联合早报》刊载《加东如切的精彩碰撞》文章,描绘加东和如切缤纷多彩的景点。与此同时,也是多元文化的地区,不仅华巫印三族,也有显著的土生华人与欧亚人特色。 不过,文化遗产学博士黄子明,发现文章中谈及奥南路(Onan Road)路名的来源有谬误。 上述文章如是介绍奥南路名称缘起: “加东奥迪安后面的圣帕加维那雅加印度庙(Sri Senpaga Vinayagar Temple)历史可追溯到1875年,由住在附近的锡兰淡米尔人所建。街道名称锡兰路、锡兰巷反映出这一带的印族特色,而奥南路路名也是来自印度咯拉拉的欧南节(Onam)。” 对此,黄子明博士指出,尽管众所周知,三巴旺一带曾有印裔马拉雅丽(Malayalee)社群居住,他们在海军造船厂工作。不过仍未有听闻,奥南路路名来自该族传统节庆的说法。 若网络查询新加坡资讯百科(Infopedia),也不难发现奥南路很有可能是根据一名从爪哇移居来的商人Onan bin Rajidin来命名。他曾在这一带建设奥南路清真寺(1980年代中期因地区重新发展而拆除)。…