M Ravi and Prof Andrew Harding

Human rights lawyer, M Ravi has just filed a constitutional challenge in the High Court against the Elected Presidency Scheme ( “EPS”) on Monday morning.
Mr Ravi wrote on his Facebook page that the application is filed in his capacity as an ordinary citizen of Singapore and that the application was served on the Attorney General.
According to the documents posted, the originating summons to Attorney General writes:

“The elements of the Elected Presidency Scheme is incapable of being constructed as being consistent with Article 12 of the Constitution in that it deprives citizens of the right to stand for public office, namely the office of the Elected Presidency.

The elements of the EPS is incapable of being construed of being consistent with Article 12 of the Constitution in the; it is discriminatory on the grounds of ethnicity and is contrary to article 12(2) of the Constitution.”

Article 12 of the Singapore Consitution
Mr Ravi announced that he will go on Facebook Live at 3pm, Tuesday to set out the reasons for his application without commenting on the merits as the matter is before the court.

In his Facebook post, Mr Ravi thanked his friend, Professor Andrew Harding who teaches law at NUS for his invaluable insights into the basic structure doctrine and wrote, “This doctrine forms the crux of the application before the court. Prof Andrew Harding is the leading expert in this area.”
Just this morning, Deputy Attorney-General Hri Kumar Nair said that the High Court could hear former presidential candidate,Dr Tan Cheng Bock’s legal challenge regarding the upcoming Malay-only presidential election in late June, at the pre-trial conference at the High Court.
Dr Tan had applied to seek the Court’s determination on whether the piece of legislation – that counts President Wee Kim Wee as the first Elected Presidency term for the purposes of calling the upcoming election a reserved election – is consistent with Singapore’s constitution.
The next presidential election is due to be held in September this year. However, under the recent amendments, a reserved election is set aside by the government for a minority race as no candidate from a particular minority group has been elected as the President after five open elections.
Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

HSBC provides liquidity and cash management support to outbreak-battered Singapore companies

In the wake the novel coronavirus Covid-19 epidemic, the Singapore branch of…

网民:放眼集齐五万联署 吁解除电动滑板车禁令

电动滑板车禁在人行道上行驶的禁令下达至今不到一周,有网民举办网络请愿活动,并放眼在周五,即明日取得五万人的签名。 署名西蒂(译音, Siti Binte Rahimat)的网民,于日前发起网上联署请愿,请愿将敬呈陆路交通管理局、交通部高级政务部长蓝彬明、交通部长许文远、交通部兼通讯及新闻部高级政务部长普杰立医生、交通兼文化、社区及青年部政务次长马炎庆等七造。 至到截稿为止,请愿书已经获得2万1824人签署。 西蒂指出,她是为个人代步工具使用者家族发出有关的请愿书,并指禁止电动滑板车在行人道上行驶,如同禁止使用。 “公共连接道(PCN)和脚车道并没有衔接,以及点对点的链接,因此限制电板车使用这两种通道,就好似让人使用厕所,却不能使用马桶一样。” 指责政府没提供替代方案 她指出,禁止骑士们使用人行道,却没有给出替代方案,简直是抹杀了个人代步工具的使用,也影响了许多国人的收入来源。 昨日已有部分外卖快递员向总理、尚穆根和蓝彬明申诉上述禁令带来的不便。 她也表示,有关禁令仓促实施,而且我国目前许多地区都没有脚车道和公共连接道,实在是令人为难。…

精英制度忽略贫富差距复杂因素 严燕松冀扶持同胞携手共进

尽管并没有出现在国家信约、国歌中,但似乎精英治国(Meritocracy)被吹捧为治国的“金科玉律”。工人党阿裕尼集选区议员严燕松提醒,精英政治固然对于打击贪腐、裙带关系是很好的准则,但似乎对每个公民都以能力和成就角度看待,而分出次优等级。 他打个比方,对于小孩我们是否也要以精英制度来苛求他们?如果考了不好的成绩,就只能吃快熟面、睡小房间?但对于我们的社会却是:你赚的不多,你就活该拥有糟糕的生活条件。 对此严燕松提及贫富差距中的复杂因素,则就好比一些人起跑条件优越,提前20米、跑道畅通无阻、还有良师指导,但遗憾的是,有些人的起跑线却可能从后方10米开始。 他指出,工人党对新加坡的愿景是国人都能达成他们的梦想,透过有竞争力的本地公司、活力经济,国人能合力打造这个家园。同时,一个有问责制的健全机制,比任何政党都更能持久。 要实现这愿景,就必须确保家庭能抵御生活中的风暴、校园能让学生为生存做好准备;社会安全网也能确保那些不慎跌倒的人,能够再次站起。 然而精英制度不看这些复杂因素,仅强调个人成就。“但我们是一个国家,不是一家企业。我们是同胞们的守护者。我们需要扶助彼此走完赛道。” 严燕松是在新加坡透视论坛,为“展望2030年新加坡政治”的对话会上,这么指出。 受邀嘉宾也包括卫生部兼通讯及新闻部高级政务部长普杰立医生,以及前进党非选区议员潘群勤。 严燕松也强调,目前面对的问题尤为复杂,需要各界的集思广益,而不是比赛谁能更快提出好主意,异议人士也不该被指责,“所有利益相关者应该合作而不是竞争,以找到应对挑战的最佳解决方案。” 普杰立:两党制由国人决定 回溯2011年,新加坡总理李显龙,曾表示两党制在新加坡根本行不通。治国最关键的是人才,唯有让A队有最大的成功机会,才能保障国家的前途,不能为了反对党所说的“买保险”,而去削弱A队。 对此,有与会者在会上抛出质问,从去年选举可见,人民希望看到更多反对党声音,行动党是否支持这种观点。…