Three days ago, a report about 70 percent of School Of The Arts (SOTA) graduates pursuing non-arts related university courses raised several questions from netizens about the role of the arts in Singapore, as well as that of the school.
According to the Straits Times report, the percentage of graduates pursuing non-arts related university courses has increased from 60 per cent in 2012 to 83 per cent in 2015.
Minister for Culture, Community and Youth, Grace Fu, had said in an award ceremony addressed to SOTA graduates that a sizeable percentage of graduates had chosen to pursue non-arts related university courses after their graduation.
A few days later, a current SOTA student had put up an art installation near the Vice-Princiapal’s office, with names of teachers who have left the school onto paper airplanes.
The installation, done in memory of the teachers who have left the school, was removed by the school the next day. The student will also be spoken to by the school as she had not sought approval from “relevant authorities” before installing her work on the school’s premises.
A former teacher, Mark Rozells, from SOTA had posted the installation on his Facebook page, saying the following:

One comment from Dorcas Tirhas replying to a netizen saying that there are so many airplanes, explained that the teachers whose names were on the paper airplanes were teachers who taught the student over her time in SOTA. “It is an expression of her loss and a respectful and meaningful tribute to them. Having said that, many of them have left in the last couple of years,” Tirhas said.

Other comments on Rozells’s thread include people appreciating the work of art and the gesture. Some also questioned the retention rate of teachers from the school.
A comment from David Gan also shed light on the context of the installation. Gan said,
“dear all, i just wanted to share that the student in question did the work during a performance art masterclass. it was a personal expression of loss and as a form of catharsis, and there was no intent to offend. the work was removed on the grounds that the student had not sought approval from the relevant authorities to install a work on school premises, and the student will be spoken to tomorrow. i would just like to say, on behalf of the student, that your words mean a lot to her. best.”

Rozells’s post, with 513 shares, had other former SOTA teachers commending SOTA’s students and multiple comments saying that the gesture will be remembered, and some others appreciating the simplistic yet impactful message.





 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Public can enter the Istana for the first time at night on 6 October

In conjunction with the Istana 150 Commemorative Event, members of the public…

李显扬:先打倒冠病19 选举须暂缓

(翻译自李显扬刊载于《马来邮报》的评论) 基于冠状病毒19 本地传播病例已超过入境病例,新加坡目前已启动“断路器”式的半封锁措施。本月3日,总理李显龙称关闭学校、非必要服务商店和工作场所的措施,旨在防堵感染传播。 经过数周的担忧后,许多国人终于松了一口气,当局采取更严谨措施来保护他们免受病毒侵害。然而,仍然有强烈的感觉,在这场健康危机的关键时刻,国家的关注重心被迫分散。 4月7日,当国人将在“阻断”措施下准备呆在家里,人民行动党(PAP)却将在国会推动通过《国会选举(冠病19特别安排)法案》。 这法案似乎显示,行动党把它和李总理的利益凌驾于家国之上。执政党似乎仍执迷于在还有整整一年任期的情况下,如何在疫情下召开选举,更何况世卫组织(WHO)已宣称这场疫情为“您能想象到的最强劲敌”。 敦促国人“相信自己为国家利益而非个人”,但李总理却无法放下即将举行的选举,令人莫名其妙。 既然行动党不太可能败选,为何那么焦急于选举?难道是畏惧经济衰退的恶果?需提出的问题是:政府是否过于被动或做得太少,只是为了避免惊动人民或限制对经济的损失?有多大程度因为提早选举的渴望而分神? 当前,新加坡理应得到总理和他团队的全盘关注,对那些每日面对感染风险的前线医护人员,予以尊重。然而, 当新感染群仍在涌现,执政党却把宝贵的时间精力都浪费在选举安排上。 新加坡应对疫情的手法获得世界赞许,也提及过去2003年SARS疫情习得许多宝贵经验。SARS疫情时,出现首位病患的26天后,就关闭学校。但这一次,自1月23日出现首宗病例以来,过了70天才关闭。这就不能怪国人的质疑:如果SARS是一场教训,何以会出现如此过度的拖延? SARS疫情出现238例确诊病例。但今年4月1日冠病19确诊人数就破千,截至4日已达到1114例。这可不同于其他战疫。冠病19比起SARS更具传染力,感染链也极其困难打破。为提早选举分心,行动党是否失察?国人是否感受到政府有把公民的福祉摆在首位?…

More must be done to improve treatment of migrant workers in Singapore post COVID-19 crisis, says Senior Counsel Harpreet Singh

The recent COVID-19 situation in Singapore has shed some light on the…

环境局民调显示 公民减少浪费食物意识提高

国家环境局民调显示,我国公民在日常作息上更环保,并在减少食物浪费的醒觉上显著提高。 环境局委托机构于今年3月至4月期间,依据2015年的类似民调方式,对1000名随机选择家庭进行面谈而展开,旨在更好地了解消费者对食物浪费的看法、行为和态度。 和2015年相比,今年的受访者明显有了更大进步,包括71巴仙受访者尽量食用冰箱中的剩余食物、64巴仙人士外出用餐时响应“光盘行动”,56巴仙人士将未吃完的食物打包回家。 此外如有摆宴席,约六成人士能做到提供适量或较少的食物,而不会提供过多餐点。有趣的是,有三巴仙的家庭使用厨余做堆肥。 然而,调查也强调了需要改进的部分,包括约四分之一的受访者表示,因为担心家庭成员“吃不够”,会在购物时购买超出所需要的商品。 受访者指出,包括有90巴仙人士表示若能帮助家人省钱且环保,他们会选择减少食物浪费。同时,有近八成受访者要求分享如何储存食物、延长食材寿命及处理多余食物等资讯,以及提供可订购少量食物的饮食场所选择。 当局指出,去年的厨余垃圾达到76万3100吨,与2017年的80万9800吨相比有所下降,然而社会各阶层还需要共同努力,并积极响应,才有可能减少食物浪费。 当局列出各阶层活动 当局举例一些非政府组织和利益团体,一直都在举办的减少食物浪费活动,如食物慈善机构Food from the Heart(FFTH)。FFTH通过将近200个分发点,将剩余食物重新分配给国内的贫困人士,并为参与学校组织年度“光盘运动”。其他的利益团体包括Foddscape…