(Photo – Terry Xu)

by Chris Kuan
A number of FB friends were asking me about the impact on the Singapore economy resulting from foreign workers’ repatriation of savings in one of Tay Kheng Soon‘s post. There is no research particular to this but I can go one better – the impact of the repatriation of income by all foreign entities, i.e. workers, foreign owned companies and Multi-National Companies (MNCs).

Courtesy of an excellent research paper “SG: National vs Domestic Growth” by DBS. Focus on the attached chart in which DBS show the relationship between our Gross Domestic Product (GDP) and our GNI (Gross National Income) – the latter is the former plus net income payment (or repatriation) of income into Singapore by Singaporeans and Singapore companies based overseas. As DBS points out GNI is lower than GDP by 2.2% of GDP and as much as 7% of GDP. The chart shows that the gap has widened especially in the last 15 years.

This means that the outward remittance of income earned by foreigners and MNCs significantly exceeds the repatriation of income earned by Singaporeans and Singapore owned companies based overseas.
Result – net outflow of income from the economy and a drag on our current account. DBS thinks this will reverse once we have successfully developed the “external wing” of our economy and correctly points out the Japanese economy’s external wing enable GNI growth to nearly double the GDP growth rates, a hugely important consideration in view of slow domestic growth resulting from demographics. Ditto Taiwan to a lesser extent than Japan.
I agree with DBS that pushing the GNI over GDP is very important for Singapore given the new normal of 2-3%, low productivity and demographics but I am not so optimistic as DBS that we can reach anywhere near the success achieved by the Japanese in developing the external wing.
That is simply because we do not have industrial champions and SMEs of the scale and breath of Japanese or even Taiwanese companies who spread their wings overseas very widely. That even today our Outward Direct Investment (ODI) continues to be small, as pointed out by DBS, in relationship to Foreign Direct Investment says as much. It pales by comparison to the massive Japanese and Taiwanese ODIs. In my humble opinion, our historic MNC and latterly foreign worker reliance might have push up our growth rates in the past but this could be troublesome for the future if we fail to achieve enough success in internationalizing local companies. Much have been talked about the external wing, but results are not coming through enough.

Outward repatriation of income by foreign entities (workers, foreign owned companies, MNCs etc) exceeds inward repatriation of income by Singaporeans and Singapore companies based overseas. This accounts for the shortfall of GNI to GDP and the gap has widened in the last 10-15 years.
This means that the external wing of the Singapore economy and the the internationalisation of local companies has not or yet to bear fruit, at least in terms of narrowing the large gap between outward and inward flow of income.

Why is this so? Does the answer lie in risk aversion by local companies? If so, that is not surprising given how local companies are slow to act and are always looking for the government to set directions.
Does the answer also lies in being too comfortable in Singapore? Very likely given that the Singapore government is very business friendly, taxes are low, no unions to contend with and access to low cost foreign workers easy. So like productivity, the external wing and the internationalisation fall victim to local companies being mollycoddled.
Remember “spurs are not stuck in their hide”? Heck, there isn’t even a Singaporean version of the legendary Mrs Watanabe, the archetypal Japanese housewife cum household Chief Financial Officer who invests the family savings across the world. As said many times before, there are always trade-offs in economic policies and some may seem small at first but can loom very large over time.
Our falling demographics ought to have been a powerful push factor to build the external wing long ago but of course it proved far easier to open access to foreign workers. But one of the positive outcome of having a large enough external wing other than addressing the drag on the current account, is that it should finally wean the economy off its over dependence on foreign workers. This should generate other positive outcomes like higher productivity, less spending on infrastructure leading to higher social spending (hopefully!) …… not sure about real estate prices though.
This post was first published on Chris Kuan’s Facebook page
Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

英相“放任式防疫”反其道而行? 英国民众吓到不敢出门

武汉冠状病毒(COVID-19)疫情肆虐全球,各国对于抗疫过程也绷紧神经,丝毫不敢松懈,采取颜值控管出入境、限制边境、甚至封国封城防疫,然而在英国却选择另类的防疫方式,一开始开启“放任式防疫”,即只有症状严重者才需要做筛检,不再计算感染人数,也不禁止大型集会活动,随即引起各界批评。 直到两天前(16日),英国首相鲍里斯·约翰逊才肯呼吁当地民众,减少非必要外出和与人接触;昨天宣布英国需像“战时政府”一样应对疫情,以及公布经济纾困计划。 目前英国已知确诊病例超过1960例,死亡人数60人。而当局以武汉冠病死亡率仅1巴仙为由,使用的“群体免疫”策略也引来医学界炮轰,但相信此举有助缓解因果医疗系统压力。 然而,在这样“放任式的防疫”下,有居住在英国的网友观察发现,这样的方式可能对英国民众反而凑效。 网友表示,他是从台湾搬到英国,所以也在观察两国的防疫设施,他发现两国的防疫措施上采取截然不同的方式。 对于台湾而言,在疫情开始时便积极准备,步步紧盯,对于每一例都紧密追踪,所以在过去两个与内,其防疫控管做得滴水不漏。 英国不停课、各行业照常营运、不检测 反观英国,在过去几周内确诊病例突然激增,却开始选择不作为的形式来选择防疫,即不取消任何聚会活动、不停课停班、各行各业照常营运、不做检测停止计算感染人数、生病自己在家休息不要到医院也不用通报的方式。 此言一出,也引发了英国陷入大恐慌,也掀起当地的抢购潮。 虽然招来很多的斥责但网友却表示,对于“耳朵一向很硬”,嘴里不停说该来的就会来、keep calm &…

Netizens criticize poor planning of the underground bicycle parking at Kampung Admiralty

On Tuesday (4 Feb), Transport Minister, Khaw Boon Wan, informed Parliament that…

Netizens question Singapore’s safety after foreign worker charged for raping student near Kranji War Memorial

Indian national Chinnaiah Karthik will be seen in court in June to…

双马会1小时谈脱贫支援小商 数码自贸区料续推行

阿里巴巴集团创办人兼董事局执行主席马云,于昨日早上9时前往会晤马国首相敦马哈迪,马云在会面后向《马新社》称,会谈气氛良好,感受到敦马的善意,间中讨论如何帮助更多大马人脱离贫穷,以及提供青年和小商家支援。马哈迪则称,与马云会面针对广泛课题有良好的意见交流。 “敦马也嘱咐我与阿里巴巴将网购科技引入大马,而我也答应培训本地人才及聘请更多本地专业青年,为大马带来更多就业机会。” 马云此行也是为阿里巴巴集团位于吉隆坡孟沙南区的办事处主持开幕。 阿里巴巴受马哈迪启发 马云也赞扬,敦马已经93岁了,但他拥有丰富的科技知识,令他惊讶。 “在会谈中我发现我们都有共同理念,包括如何透过科技来协助偏乡或农村的年轻人,与全世界互动,拓展自身潜能和机会,跻身国际大舞台。” 他声称,创立阿里巴巴集团,也是受到首相吨马哈迪的多媒体超级走廊(MSC)计划得到启发。 “1997年,我得知马哈迪提出多媒体超级走廊的概念,设立网际网络平台,认为这是绝妙电子,如果马来西亚做得到,为何中国不能?我不能这么做?” 他也强调,马哈迪的概念仍未过时,也有信心透过阿里巴巴和马国合作,马来西亚会成为真正的多媒体超级走廊,富裕大多数中小企业和年轻人庞大商机。 马云:不担心新政府检讨中资计划 马云获前首相拿督斯里纳吉邀请,担任数码自由贸易区(DFTZ)顾问。希盟政府上台后,曾宣布将重新审视前朝果真政府批准的大型计划。惟马云相信大马新政府虽检讨中国在大马投资,数码自贸区仍会继续推行。 “阿里巴巴不担心在马的各项投资计划,首相敦马已清楚传达大马是对外资与商业投资友善的国家,欢迎阿里巴巴和外汇投资项目。”…