Josephine Teo (Photo: Bloomberg)

Ms Josephine Teo, Minister in Prime Minister’s Office & Second Minister for Manpower & Second Minister for Foreign Affairs in her most recent Facebook post shared her views as a mother on the choice of milk powder, stating that “milk is milk, however fancy the marketing.”
Ms Teo’s posting comes following closely after the release of recent report by the Competition Commission of Singapore (CCS) which stated that the increase in prices of milk powder over the past years was likely driven by heavy investment into marketing and research & development activities undertaken by Formula Milk manufacturers to attract parents to purchase their premium products.
Ms Teo shared that she and her husband stressed over which milk powder to get years ago when her kids started to drink formula milk as there were many brands and varying prices.
“But were there significant differences in nutritional value? Did paying more mean helping baby develop better?” were some of the questions that she had.
Ms Teo noted in her post that breastmilk is best and highlighted that both the Health Promotion Board, Singapore and World Health Organization (WHO) encourage mothers to breastfeed for at least 12 months.
At the same time, she also reassured parents who need to supplement their child with formula milk that all brands sold in Singapore, regardless of price, provide enough nutrition for babies to grow healthily. Noting that the child need not rely on milk powder after turning one year old. “Fresh cow’s milk, as part of a balanced diet, works well enough.”
She shared on her personal experience, “For my own journey, I concluded that milk is milk, however fancy the marketing. As long as AVA approves its import, the milk is good enough. I had no reason to pay more and would buy whatever was cheapest or on sale. The kids didn’t always like adjusting but did so anyway. That’s what I found great about kids – they adjust given time and encouragement”
In response to the findings, authorities will restrict formula milk manufacturers from using nutrition and health claims, as well as images that make drinking formula milk look attractive, once changes to Agri-Food and Veterinary Authority of Singapore (AVA) regulations take effect. AVA will also also streamline its import regulations in order to facilitate the entry of more suppliers and brands of formula milk, and the changes are expected to be finalised by end-2017.

Minister’s comment misses the point
In hundreds of comments that can be found on Channel News Asia’s Facebook page, readers do not seem to agree with Ms Teo nor think that the Minister has addressed the matter appropriately.
Keith Low wrote, “Totally out of point from the just promoted minister. The issue on hand is why are milk powders sold in Singapore are so much more expensive than other countries. It’s not buying cheap vs expensive formulas. Even our cheapest formulas are also much expensive than the regions.”
David Tan wrote, “To be fair not all expensive brands equates better quality. But I thought the original discussions was why the substantial increase in prices? Why are there no one taking that up? Just beat around the bush and blah blah blah and skip the question. And I also wonder, each time our millionaire ministers says something that sounds absurd, so many netizens will condemn them online but each election we see the same group of ppl being elected. Don’t expect any changes if we do the same thing over and over again.”
John Han wrote, “Please Miss Teo, how long ago u buy milk powder for your kids. Rewind back please. How many choice of milk powder we have back then. The choice were limited. Fast forward now, we have so many brands and choices now. You of course can say ‘I have no reason to pay more and would buy whatever was cheapest or on sale’ analogy… Last time milk powder display (shelves) ‘don’t need a big space’ like now. Last time the shelves need only ‘Small space’ if you know what I meant. Question now is, which department involved in the pricing of the milk powder and other stuffs… same brand same product same manufacture but price differs when you enter different countries for sales..”
Faustina Chay wrote, “Hmm to just buy what ever is on sale / cheaper? Doesn’t it make more sense to buy many cans of formula milk when it’s on offer so u don’t need to keep on changing / checking out what’s on sale every now and then? And I beg to differ that milk is just milk. Even among the different brands of full cream fresh milk , the taste is different. If milk is just milk , why have so many brands? Just 1 will do!
Not the cheapest but the most compatible milk
Parents also chimed in, noting that it is not the choice of parents to make to buy the cheapest milk powder available but also powder that the baby is compatible with.
Masrina Rashid wrote, “She doesn’t even knows what she is saying. What marketing is she referring too? I did not even know the brands of milk available until I looked up in forums myself to find out from other mummies. The only marketing Movements I saw were their presenters passing free gifts and samples at the gynae clinic to pregnant ladies during my checkup. Aiyoh. This is embarrassing. At least before u speaks to the public, go and do ur own research. If u cant do it because u are so busy managing other companies… go and get a good editor. Dont just say it because u assume so.”
Michelle Ho wrote, “I totally agree with some of the comments above, it is not about buying cheap. It is whether the baby is able to take the milk formula. I say that from experience as I had spent a lot of money to change Brand’s to come to the right brand which suits my baby.”
Khan Hong Chiew wrote, “I disagreed with what she said, my daughter was born in Alexandra hospital in 1980 and was given Lactogen milk powder, I continued with it after Mother and child discharged from the hospital, after a few days my daughter got diarrhoea, I shared my daughter’s problem with a friend, he told me that my daughter was allergic to the milk powder and recommended me to change to S26, after a few hours, her diarrhoea stopped, subsequently I chose SMA milk powder for my son and S26 again for my 3rd daughter.”
Rohana Mudzaffar wrote, “Talk nonsense…cofirm not she’s not a responsible Mother. A good parent will buy what is best for her child in terms of dietry needs & child’s well-being – not “buy whatever was cheapest or on sale”. Parents dont chg formula milk depending on sales.. Confirm this one never take care of children..”
Hafeezy Mus wrote, “It was never about the brand or the nutrients it’s all be compatibility. If the kid prefers one kind of milk and it happens to be the expensive kind what could we as parents do. To be honest, if I could give the kid from the get go, I would.”
“Who doesn’t want the best brand?”
A comment which received most attention was a comment from Darren Tan who questioned the Minister’s posting on the matter, asking if the Minister is being hypothetical in what she is saying and what she practice in reality.
Darren Tan wrote, “I have strong doubts on what she said. If that’s the case, why’s she driving a car and living in private property? She has no reason to pay more when she can also get by with public transport and living in public flats like the rest of us. Get real. So what if all milk are the same? Who doesn’t want the best brand? The government has “groomed” Singapore into such a materialistic society (starting from the very top where ministers are paid millions) and now she’s attempting to reverse course?”
Another reader, Amelia Ng wrote to Tan, alleging that he is misinterpreting what the Minister meant. She wrote, “If the formula makes it to the shelves in Singapore, it means that it has passed certain standards and anything else is purely based on the parents’ choice. To be honest, I would go for the cheapest formula if my kids didn’t have eczema. She is lucky that her kids could adjust accordingly. Also, the government did not make Singaporeans materialistic, we are responsible for what we become. The government gets blamed for problems in the education system, housing and now milk powder? We are human and have a brain to think. We have the choice to choose not to conform to the so-called societal standards. No one is asking you to enrol your kids into top schools, buy expensive houses that you can barely pay for , nor the most expensive milk powder that claims to help your child’s brain development. You have a choice!”
In response, Tan wrote, “Amelia, I didn’t misinterpret what she meant. As I said, I understood her point – she is trying to say all milk powder are the same in terms of nutritional value. My point was: so what if they’re all the same? Who doesn’t want to get the best brand for their kids? Moreover, I doubt there can ever be a one-size- fits-all milk powder. As some others mentioned, it also depends on the baby’s digestive system, any allergic reactions, premature baby and so on. I brought in housing because going by her logic, a house is still a house which provides shelter and comfort. Why must she stay in a private house opposed to a HDB flat which most other Singaporeans live in?
And here you are trying to downplay the role of the singaporean government in people’s lives. Have you forgotten what Lee Kuan Yew said before? The Singapore government has to interfere even in the most personal decisions of our lives like where to live! The government has always advocated for people to get the best, be the best. So now – what’s wrong with trying to get the best milk brand?”
Double standards by political leaders
Another comment that received the same level of attention which noted that trend of apparent double standards practiced by Singapore’s political leaders.

Diu Lei wrote,

They tell us Public Transport is good, but they all move around in chauffeured limousine.
They tell us Hawker Food is good, but they all do fine dining.
They tell us Neighbourhood School is good, but their kids all goes to top ranked school.
They tell us Public Hospital is good, but they all goes to private doctors.
They tell us to fight for our lunch, but they keep giving lunch to their own.
They tell us degree is useless, but all the job listing including govt jobs ask for degrees.
They tell us HDB is good and affordable, but they all stays in guarded bungalows.
They tells us $1k is enough to live by, BUT THEY ASK TO BE PAID MILLIONS!

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

GovTech and NUS signed agreement to develop public sector agencies

The Government Technology Agency of Singapore (GovTech) has announced the signing of…

邻国议员提议 联合提名“马国及新加坡小贩文化”

邻国马来西亚槟城州政府,有意向联合国教科文组织(UNESCO)申请将槟城小贩文化,列入世界非物质文化遗产名录。 槟州议员杨顺兴指出,已致函国家遗产局及旅游部,要求当局与我国一同联合提名”马国及新加坡小贩文化“。 “槟州政府希望国家遗产局与新加坡联合提名,因为联合国教科文组织规定,只有通过该组织遴选委员会的会员国,才能进行有关的提名。“杨顺兴亦说道。 新加坡总理李显龙2018年8月宣布,将申请“小贩文化”成为联合国教科文组织的“非物质文化遗产”。 然而,邻国的部分网民却认为,东南亚各国多半皆有小贩文化,除大马与新加坡外,诸如台湾夜市、香港大排档,以及印尼等地,都有不同型式的摊贩文化,故新加坡的小贩中心并非独一无二。 杨顺兴也指出,“槟州小贩文化比新加坡小贩文化更具特色,因为除了小贩中心,我们依旧还有路边摊。 “ 另一当地议员李凯伦,则担心马国在提名事宜上仍原地踏步,不够主动,或导致新加坡的小贩文化率先被承认。 目前我国为“新加坡小贩文化”申遗设立投票网站,获逾八万网民点击支持。

7月也不行! 防备疫情复发民主党重申勿仓促选举

早前,有专家分析我国执政政府或会配合解封的第二阶段,将大选定在6月底至7月初举行。 5月28日,副总理兼财政部长王瑞杰也在访谈中声称选举临近,需要做好准备。但对此工人党也质问,应尽早公布具体在疫情下如何进行竞选的细节和详情。 对于盛传7月选举的揣测,民主党在今日(3日)发文告,认为我国刚结束近两个月的阻断措施,政府都还在摸索如何应对当前社会和经济局势。 在当前局势不明朗、冠状病毒19疫情后遗症还在持续的情况下,若7月举行选举,无疑将威胁国人的安全和健康。 即便贸工部长陈振声早前也坦言,选举局无法过早公布来届选举规则,理由是规则都可能会因疫情局势而需要调整转变。 民主党重申勿仓促举行选举,部长和政府机构理应集中精神和资源,防备疫情如同其他国家那般,出现复发现象。 该党敦促执政党不要重蹈覆辙,犯上三月份的疏失,因转移视线备战竞选,结果导致疫情大爆发。该党也认为,理应在疫情确实受控的情况下才状况选举,且各国已积极采取措施,相信冠病疫情终将能克服。 该党强调,选举既然不需要等到2021年4月才召开,但也可在今年底才进行。不过前提是人民行动党政府把群众健康摆在首位。

Standard Chartered study: Investors in S'pore value confidence, financial comfort and risk tolerance more so than Hong Kong and Taiwan counterparts

Compared to investors in Hong Kong and Taiwan, counterparts in Singapore have…