Labour chief Chan Chun Sing speaks at the Temasek Polytechnic graduation ceremony (Source: The Straits Times).

Minister in the Prime Minister’s Office Chan Chun Sing told Singaporeans that it is more important for students to give meaning to their pursuits instead of searching for meaning in all that they do in life.
Speaking at the first session of Temasek Polytechnic’s (TP) graduation ceremony where 272 diplomas were handed out to students in the School of Applied Science, Mr Chan said that there are many choices in life and people are often searching for something that will give them meaning. But we will often fail and then we will be disappointed.
The Minister then urged students to change their perspective when it comes to achieving their goals in life and to think about how they can “do justice” to the jobs that they are doing instead of embarking on a search for the perfect job.
He asked, “Is it (more important) to marry the woman you love, or to love the woman you marry?”, drawing the link between this issue to a common question in relationships.
The Minister also urged students to remain adaptable in a changing world. citing the example of veterinary technology student Sim Xin Xian, who got a job offer after an internship with a shrimp farm in Sumatra, Indonesia. Despite cultural and language barriers, she adjusted to life there and got along well with her colleagues. Mr Chan said that this is the kind of spirit that the country wants.
“You go to a new place, you don’t know the people, you don’t know the culture. But with the skill sets that you have acquired you learn to adapt – and you will survive and excel”
Many readers lashed out at the reports of his remarks and commented that the Minister just does not make any sense. Here is a sample of what they wrote:

  • Bernard Kew playing on the remarks of the Minister, wrote, “Vote the Minister you love or love the Minister that has been Voted. Facepalm.”
  • Siti Suhana wrote “Says someone who probably has never worked in a blue collar job.”
  • Trampas Django wrote, “Most of our women don’t marry us locals, they marry foreigners. And we end up getting married to foreigners as well. Anyway, this guy doesn’t know what he is talking about”
  • Joan Ark wrote, ” I wonder if he married the women he loved or loved the women he married. Either way, his wife is enjoying his 1 million a month pay cheque.”
  • Julia Teng Roo Seen wrote, “How does one equate marriage to a job?!? Is this guy even married then, if he is, how does his marriage make him spout such bullshit? And he was delivering this to some fresh diploma grads?? Stop misleading these young people! Get your ideas together, please. Do justice to the job that you are so highly paid for!”
  • Shi Wei wrote, “This comparison just doesn’t make sense on so many levels.
    I wonder what the ladies out there would feel if their spouses were to say such a thing to their faces?
    Work is a transactional act, something people do for money above everything else.”
  • Marcellus Louis wrote, “What talking him? This Chan Chuan Sing and Josephine always talk rubbish just to try and shape things to go the way they want us to fit in, disgracing PAP and their batch of “young” batch leaders.
    So he is only loving his wife just because he sees his wife as a good medium or tool with connections to help him to get a better life? Instead of loving his wife wholeheartedly that’s why he asked her to marry him?
    That’s such a scum move if he did that. I think he is self-contradicting himself, he should learn to think more before vomiting junk of sentences that doesn’t make sense.”
  • JereMe Lim wrote, “Poor analogy, every circumstance is different, there is no one size fits all approach to everything in life. This guy really has a one track mind and I sincerely hope he won’t become our PM.”
  • Friday RayCal wrote, “Talk rubbish. To marry a person also sure need to search for a one and most important both can get well together and love.Not simply married. Same goes for a job need to search. Job will never come by itself.Need to see or to know is that work scope I’m interested in or can I do it with love interest and especially if you take up a certain diploma or degree in certain skill study or courses we like. Bottom line here is better to do or love the thing or a person and even your work or job that make you stay happy in life. Gundu so don’t take things and compare. You think you want to do what you are doing now? You are lucky. You should thank God. You and I believe it’s just because of money and with money and background secure of course your wife or girlfriend 100 percent die die love you.”
  • See Dick San wrote, “Government will always blame its people, rather than to admit their shortcomings. Anyway, they are humans too. When the majority of human reach an end where they ran out of solutions quick, what they can do is giving excuses, once that runs out, they will do the begging/emotional part. Just like any others in Singapore, no one would admit their mistakes immediately. We’ll see.”
  • James Soh wrote, “Time to return to the 50s and 60s. Anyhow get a wife (mostly decided by parents) and try your best to love her. Same for jobs, pick up whatever job available and do your best to love it! Oh….no, we can’t be that bad, can we?”
  • Christopher Wahid wrote, “WTF. We voted for the Government to see us through Not to teach us how to pull through. That being the case, we already know how to survive, not for these guys whom we voted to tell us to hold and upgrade our jobs.
    The Government should know how it’s like to earn 2000 and live a normal life. Where is justice,
    Mr. MP? I don’t see any improvements in blue collar jobs. Do you?”
  • Mike Wong wrote, “Do you work for money or do you love the work? Guess he is paid in millions not love! Who would not love his job because of the money? Job and love are contractual agreement either parties not satisfied, either party can file for separation and find the right one. Not sure whose mind is not working, his or mine?”
  • Dennis Cheng wrote, “The benchmark for job satisfaction varies from person to person with different qualification, background, personal requirement and etc. If I have a family with many mouths to feed can I just settle down for a job that pays a meagre salary? The poor fellow will not have enough to put food on the table, not be able to provide education for his children, will not be able to seek adequate medical attention and etc. The poor will not be able to break free from poverty and the cycle will carry on.”
  • Kelvin Choo wrote, “Having a job is a transactional relationship. Love isn’t, it’s mutual.”
  • Dan Ang wrote, “He should say that to his fellow cabinet ministers, do justice for the salary they are taking.”
  • Frank Chong wrote, “When you’re paid $25,000 monthly for doing nothing, damn right you gonna love that job!”
  • Dave Tan wrote, “It’s not love the woman you married nor marry the woman you love. It’s most women “taken” by foreigners.”
  • Lau Pa Sat wrote, “Philosophised by someone who never who hold a normal job.”
  • Shaun Hotchand wrote, “Please continue your work and please show warm and some friendliness. Show your care and concern make us understand the two-way. We don’t need lectures ..”
Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

三住户及时被疏散 疑个人代步工具充电引发火患

尽管多次呼吁勿将个人代步工具长时间充电与更换不合格电池,但意外仍不停发生。民防部队指出,金文泰一区发生了一起火灾,疑似与个人代步工具充电有关。 民防部队昨日(5日)脸书指出,该起意外发生在昨日下午12时45分左右,位于金文泰西2街第715座组屋14楼的一个单位。据悉,个人代步工具当时正停在走廊上,而三名住户已被疏散,所幸无人伤亡。 经民防部队初步调查,起火原因应该与当时个人代步工具正在充电有关。从民防部队所公布的照片来看,火势将外墙熏黑,并烧毁走廊上的物品,个人代步工具也被烧至剩下铁架与轮胎,可见火势不轻。 民防部队也呼吁拥有个人代步工具的骑士应检查电池是否符合UL2272规格,切勿购买不符合规格的个人代步工具。详情可前往website go.gov.sg/ul2272sg查询。 昨日,民防部队也上载了一段个人代步工具爆炸的视频,视频内其爆炸就在电光火石之间,而且爆炸出现了数次,可见其影响力并不小。 民防部队也解释该视频是个人代步工具电池着火时的实际状况,爆炸的瞬间会快速引发火势蔓延,在短短的一分钟内,就引发了数次威力不小的爆炸。 这样的人为意外,也同时造成了多次意外,导致大规模疏散、甚至是伤亡事件。 该视频并没有解释从何而来,但明显是来自监控摄像。

李玮玲炮轰一再重复总理不实指控 官媒只字不提

日前,总理妹妹李玮玲炮轰,本地一家主流媒体一再重复其哥哥李显龙对李显扬的“不实且可耻的指控”。 他在其脸书也驳斥,指李显扬涉及诈欺父亲以在遗嘱中获得更多份额的说法, “根本就是说谎”,不过李玮玲未指名道姓是哪家媒体的报导。 不过,李玮玲的指责,似乎“有迹可循”。本月9日,《海峡时报》跟进林学芬诉讼一案,提到律师公会聘请高级律师暨WongPartnership副主席陈志明来处理此案,意味着陈志明将与为林学芬辩护的前总检察长温长明对决公堂。 《海时》的这篇报导也提及,总检察署在今年一月投诉到律师公会,质疑林学芬作为专业律师,在为李光耀准备最终遗嘱一事,有失职之嫌的表面证据。他的丈夫李显扬也是遗嘱的受益人。 “李显扬在最终遗嘱的份额有提升。”报导续称,李显扬称林学芬从未担任父亲律师,最终遗嘱有柯金梨负责,但后者已否认。 然而,《海时》的报导却没有注明,所谓“李显扬的份额提升”的论点,是否来自总检察署的指控。(事实上,这是来自李显龙总理在2017年代宣誓声明中,在他的前律师黄鲁胜建议下,作出的指控。) 在2017年成立的部长委员会,李显龙的宣誓声明指责,林学芬有份参与最终遗嘱的拟定。李显龙直指,弟媳林学芬身为利害关係人,直接参与遗嘱的订立“耐人寻味”,並且“似乎涉及利益衝突”。 对此,李玮玲在其个人脸书透露,2012年,父亲确有打算在遗嘱中分给他较多的份额,但是在2013年,又重新回归到公平分配的决定。 根据李玮玲的说法,柯金梨在2015年6月,曾致函给他们三位兄妹,指出父亲同意把所有遗产平分给三位子女。“最终遗嘱如此确定。我们拿到平分的遗产,不多也不少。” 有趣的是,一直都有跟进欧思礼路故居议题和总理家族纠纷的官方媒体,不论是《海峡时报》、新传媒还是《今日报》,似乎选择性地忽略掉李玮玲的贴文,官媒报导只字不提后者做出的反驳。

At least 21 SGX-listed companies closed factories in M’sia in observance of restricted movement order

Complying with Malaysia’s restricted movement order, at least 21 firms listed on…

私家产业居民 逾16万人没申报所得税

财政部第二部长英兰妮于昨日(5月8日)在国会上指出,约有16万400名居住在私人产业的人士,并没有申报个人所得税。 这群体占了270万成年国民约六巴仙,没有任何年收入或只有免税收入,如银行利息或股息。 虽然有些人可能有应缴税费收入,但是在扣除免税和回扣后,就无须再申报所得税了。 英兰妮指出,这个群体包括了可以从其他管道取得经济来源的国民。这些人可以是拥有私人储蓄的退休人员,也可以是从家庭成员处获得经济资助的人们。 她说道,政府并没有进一步了解这群体的财务状况,因为他们只收集税务管理所需的信息。 她在回答蒙巴登议员林谋泉提问时,如是回答。林谋泉问道,居住私人房产但是没有申报收入的公民人数。 国民反馈不公平 他在随后的补充提问中,也问到是否有采取更多措施来评估这些私产居民的财务状况,尤其是那些没有收入、可能“真正贫穷”的国民。 目前居住在私人房产的国民,没有资格获得数项预算条款,包括消费税补助券(GST Vouchers)、以及政府赞助包括数码电视启用配套等其他措施。 他引述其选区的反馈说道,一些居民已经注意到有关的措施是不公平的,并且因为他们的住家类型,而让他们处于不利的地位。 英兰妮对此表示,一些社会计划是考量到特定群体而构思出来的,就好比消费税补助券旨在帮助低收入群体。…