Credit: Philip Pilosian / Shutterstock.com

A man was forcefully removed from a United Airlines Chicago-Louisville flight by aviation police officials at Chicago’s O’Hare international airport on Sunday (9 April).
It has been revealed that the man removed from the plane was Dr David Dao, a Vietnamese-American doctor. He has five children, four of whom are doctors, and is married to paediatrician, Dr Teresa Dao.
Due to United Express Flight 3411 being overbooked, four passengers were asked to leave the plane. According to The Independent, “United Airlines’ parent company chief executive Oscar Munoz revealed the company had been trying to make room for four employees of a partner airline, which resulted in four passengers being told to get off the flight from Chicago’s O’Hare International Airport to Louisville”.
The viral video of the man being violently dragged was filmed by several passengers on board. Jayse D. Anspach, a passenger seated close to where Dr Dao was manhandled, filmed the incident and posted it on her Twitter account. Her video has since been retweeted 167,267 times.

Oscar Munoz, United Airline’s CEO issues statement

Jayse D. Anspach, a witness, told WHAS11 News that 10 minutes after he was forcibly removed from the flight, Dr Dao ran back into the plane, his face still bloody, clung onto a post at the back, and kept repeating “I need to go home”.
United quickly issued a statement from their CEO, Oscar Munoz, after the incident occurred.

The statement received backlash from netizens, raising eyebrows at United’s method of “re-accomodating” passengers and how people doubted if the airline was apologetic.

 
 

 
 
 
Yesterday, another statement was issued:

The truly horrific event that occurred on this flight has elicited many responses from all of us: outrage, anger, disappointment. I share all of those sentiments, and one above all: my deepest apologies for what happened. Like you, I continue to be disturbed by what happened on this flight and I deeply apologize to the customer forcibly removed and to all the customers aboard. No one should ever be mistreated this way.
I want you to know that we take full responsibility and we will work to make it right.
It’s never too late to do the right thing. I have committed to our customers and our employees that we are going to fix what’s broken so this never happens again. This will include a thorough review of crew movement, our policies for incentivizing volunteers in these situations, how we handle oversold situations and an examination of how we partner with airport authorities and local law enforcement. We’ll communicate the results of our review by April 30th.
I promise you we will do better.
Sincerely,
Oscar

In the midst of statements released by the airline, CNBC obtained an email that was sent out to the staff of United. Senior Assignment Desk Manager and Manager of CNBC Business News Internship Program Ryan Ruggiero shared the email on his Twitter. In the email, Mr Munoz said he stands behind his staff and commends them for “continuing to go above and beyond to ensure we fly right”. In the breakdown of events noted by the CEO, he narrated how Mr Dao was reluctant to leave the flight and described him as “disruptive” and “belligerent”.


The letter to his staff came after the first public statement from United addressing the issue. There has also been official pages on Twitter and Facebook calling for the boycott of the airline.

The Internet responds

The public relations disaster from United Airlines prompted netizens to post their suggested United Airlines motto on Twitter with the hashtag #newunitedairlinesmottos.

 
 

 
 

 
 
 
 
 
 

 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 
 
Many believed that Southwest Airlines also took a jab at United with a new slogan:

 
 
 
 
 
A check by TOC showed no official slogan released by the airlines. They did, however, actively replied to Twitter users who engaged them on the thread about United.

 
 
 
 
Emirates Airline, on the other hand, did not hold back. In a tweet on 12 April, the airline mentioned in their video how Mr Munoz had said, “Those (gulf) airlines aren’t airlines.” This was Emirates Airline’s response:
https://twitter.com/emirates/status/851845063999188994?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw&ref_url=http%3A%2F%2Ffortune.com%2F2017%2F04%2F11%2Femirates-united-airlines-oscar-munoz-passenger-removal%2F

United loses stock

In the latest update by the story unfolding around United, United’s market capitalization, (the company’s current value), fell by over $750 million, according to Gizmodo. From United’s market cap being $22.5 billion as of Monday’s close, to $21.70 billion by Tuesday, it is predicted that the stock will continue to plummet by at least 2.8% by the end of the week, making a significant loss of United’s market value by over $600 million since last week’s close.

Airlines have a legal right to overbook flights


It is not uncommon for airlines to overbook their flights. There are usually about 10 to 15 extra passengers onboard flights to make up for the number of no-shows, according to FlightGlobal’s Asia Finance Editor Ellis Taylor’s conversation with Channel NewsAsia.
“In the case of United, it looks like this was a last-minute situation where they had to accommodate staff,” the FlightGlobal editor said.
But if no one volunteers, airlines have the right to offload passengers, and even get security involved. “Every time you buy an airline ticket, the conditions will state that the airline can offload you at any point of their flight and it is usually a last resort for airlines to force people off an aircraft. In this situation, there could be more to it than the video lets on,” he added.
The shocking turn of events for Flight 3411 only came to light from the outcry of extreme unfair treatment and filming from passengers on board. With close to one billion worth of stock wiped off the company’s value, following the PR disaster and a possible pending lawsuit against United, the era of social media has taken a new meaning to bringing light to issues that could have easily been swept under the rug by corporations.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Indonesia’s Constitutional Court to hold hearing of Prabowo’s legal challenge against Jokowi’s Presidential Election victory on Tuesday

Indonesia’s Constitutional Court has allowed the hearing of opposition former presidential candidate…

Marine Parade Family Service Centre: Say 'Yes' to Eldercare Services

The following is a press release by Marine Parade Family Service Centre…

因不明机尾撞击事件 新航一班机滞留仰光维修

新加坡航空公司一架飞机尾部于上周一(11月25日),在缅甸遭受“可疑的机尾撞击”导致损坏,目前正在仰光国际机场进行维修。 新航昨日(3日)致函《亚洲新闻台》时指出,新航的SQ998航班在阳关着陆,机尾似乎在起飞或着陆时,与跑道发生撞击。 惟,新航发言人表示,该航班平稳地滑向航站楼,全部的乘客都安全下机。 发言人指出,目前工程师们正在评估该架空客A330-300的损坏情况,并向仰光机场申请派遣一架救援飞机,负责SQ997航班的返程,有关的飞机已经在当地时间下午6时23分起飞。 “新航将会持续按时提供新加坡往返仰光的服务。” 当局也表示,该事件正交由缅甸航空事故调查局(AAIB)调查,而该局也将会和调查局密切合作。 一班机悉尼着陆意外 上周四,新航一架货运飞机在悉尼机场着陆时,飞机的发动机吊舱撞到了地面。 新航也在昨天的邮件中回应有关事件时指出,事件肇因乃该波音B747-400型号的货机因拒绝着陆而执行复飞。 目前,澳大利亚当局已经对此事展开调查。