Forfar House – belonging to a category of its own and described as “symbolic of things to come”, this 14-storey building was the highest public residence when opened in 1956. Photography by Koh Kim Chay.

Home, or at least the idea of home, are not just points on maps. For some, they represent investments for the future while for others, universal sanctuaries and places of communion and safety. As a country synonymous with change and progress, Singapore’s landscape has been terraformed. From kampungs and cemeteries, dense jungles and tropical maladies, the country has transformed from one of the worst housing crises in the world to a place where 90% of its citizens own their own home. And although our physical homes have changed irrevocably through the decades, our own emotions and attitudes have adapted to these upheavals as well.

Winstedt Court flats – The estate was named after Sir Richard Olaf Winstedt, a colonial administrator and advisor to the Sultan of Johor in 1931. Photography by Koh Kim Chay.
Photographer Koh Kim Chay, 61, has been documenting changes in Singapore since the mid-80s. An avid street-walker and lover of old Singapore, he remembers that “[i]n Pickering and George Street, the rows of Chinese coffin shops fascinated me, and in the street market of Chinatown, I watched exotic animals being slaughtered for sale. All of these are gone. The rapid economic progress that started in the 1970s saw the demise of much of our architectural heritage”. Working with Kim Chay is photographer Eugene Ong, 39, who has edited copious amounts of negatives and researched on these vanished scenes.
A lush view of Princess Elizabeth Park Estate – this estate was formed in 1951, partially because of donations made to the Princess Elizabeth wedding celebratory funds. Photography by Koh Kim Chay.
Part of this two-decade long effort to remember Singapore’s past has been formalized into a photographic body of work- Singapore’s Vanished Public Housing Estates. Shot on analog film and mostly developed in the traditional darkroom, the publication features photographs of 27 early public housing estates and precincts with an introduction to the photographer’s work and vision.
From the lush expanse of colonial-era Princess Elizabeth Park estate to the brick-clad heights of Pickering Street, these photographs are not turn-of-the-century archaic but neither are they contemporary enough to be familiarly recognized – especially to a younger generation of Singaporeans. Some of the photographs feature Singapore’s dwellings constructed by the SIT (Singapore Improvement Trust) in their last standing days. Others showcase the newer generation flats in ‘refurbished’ or newly emerging estates then, with their concomitant architectural features and recognizable amenities, though all these have been expunged already.
Blks 7 and 8 were some unique examples of H-styled blocks along Yung Kwang Road at Taman Jurong. They were built by Jurong Town Corporation instead of HDB. Photography by Koh Kim Chay.
Accompanying these photographs are postcards, vintage maps, HDB (Housing Development Board) eviction notices and other memorabilia related to the estates. Each works associatively and non-verbally to activate the past as something that was lived in; pockets of domestic drama that although enacted years ago are not difficult to reimagine. As pictorial records of our first homes in historically significant and newly emerging estates then, they are an invaluable window into Singapore’s changing housing landscape in the 50s and beyond.
The book caters to a broad range of interests and sensibilities —advocates of heritage, photographers, artists, amateur historians and perhaps professional architects. Singaporeans, local and abroad, might find in these pages something worthwhile to reminisce. Foreigners and tourists, coming from regions with vastly different identities and dialects, may be curiously attracted to this formative period in Singapore’s housing program.
Singapore’s Vanished Public Housing Estates is designed by Do Not Design, a creative agency specializing in work for art, culture and commerce. Setting out to design to surprise and innovate; to create values and to build relationship with audiences. They have also published Architecture and the Architect: Image-making in Singapore and Dear Vol 1: Lost & Found. The latter, which is a celebratory funded project by SG50, has been awarded two wood pencils at the prestigious British D&AD (Design & Art Direction Awards) for the independent magazine category as well as Tokyo Type Director’s Club Award 2016.
For more information, please get in touch with Eugene Ong, [email protected]; The crowd funding campaign is available at this link https://igg.me/at/svphe
[iframe id=”https://player.vimeo.com/video/200633257″]
About the photographers

Koh Kim Chay
Koh Kim Chay (Born 1956) devoted 38 years of his working life in Singapore’s cutting and welding industries, including the last 15 years tinkering with welding robots in a government-linked company.
He is an active contributor to Singapore’s heritage and is a recipient of the supporter award at the Patron of the Heritage Award 2006 by the National Heritage Board.
Eugene Ong
Eugene Ong (Born 1977) studied Political Science and English Literature in the National University of Singapore and the University of York. An experienced educator of 13 years, he is also interested in city planning, architectural heritage and photography.
His photographs on housing estates have appeared in LianHe ZaoBao. He taught the International Baccalaureate in the School of the Arts, Singapore from 2008 to 2016.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Jobs in Singapore – 54,000 Job vacancies: Really?

~by: Leong Sze Hian~ About two weeks ago, I gave a talk…

Semakau Landfill to run out of space by 2035, NEA plans to reuse landfilled materials to “turn trash into treasure”

The National Environment Agency (NEA) announced earlier today (25 September) that it…

人权律师叹在狮城诉诸司法不便宜

日前,本地社运分子范国瀚因被判藐视法庭罪而申请上诉,不过他必须先缴两万元的担保金(security for costs),如果上诉失败,这笔担保金也拿不回,令他感叹“正义也不便宜啊!”(Justice is not cheap!)。不过所幸后来他得到总理弟弟李显扬襄助,为他负担这笔费用。 对此,本地人权律师拉维(M.Ravi)就在脸书发文分享,他今早告知马国律师同业阿伦卡西(Arun Kasi),范国瀚上诉需缴两万元担保金,令后者感到惊讶。 他指出,事实上目前马国上诉庭和联邦法院申请上诉,是不需要缴担保金的,过去的费用的一千令吉马币,不过有关收费已在去年取消,确保当事人有申诉正义的管道。 他说,如果没有富有赞助者的襄助,范国瀚可能也会痛失上诉的权利,除了范,还有另一同样被判藐视法庭罪的民主党要陈两裕,也在为筹募两万元上诉担保金头痛。 “这就是在新加坡诉诸司法面对的可悲情况。甚至有时需仰仗有钱有势人家的协助。” 除了抵押金,向法院提呈诉讼的费用也非常贵,增加司法费用。“若说新加坡拥有全球最高昂的诉讼和法庭相关费用,我不会感到惊讶。”…