Singapore Police Force (SPF) issued a media statement on Sunday evening in protest to an article which was published on Saturday (11 March) by Reuters on a protest against the recently announced water price hike, stating that the media had attempted to stoke fears about the use of the Speakers’ Corner and sow distrust of the Police.
Pointing to one of the lines in the article, “The organisers of Saturday’s protest said more people would have turned up if they had not feared a police crackdown.”, the Police said that this presents a false and misleading picture of the use of the Speakers’ Corner in Singapore.
It stated that the Speakers’ Corner was established in 2000 as a designated site for Singaporeans to speak on any issue, without the need for a police permit, as long as the event does not cause racial or religious enmity or pose any law and order risks.
“Many large-scale events involving thousands of participants have since been held at the Speakers’ Corner,” the Police added.
Just last Saturday, a group of citizens held a protest event at Hong Lim Park, Speakers’ Corner to voice their concerns over the hike in water prices as announced in the Budget 2017. About 200 over members of public turned up at the event, listening to the speeches made by 10 speakers.
In the last sentence of the Reuters’ article on the event, it also mentioned the charging of six people for creating a public nuisance while protesting against a compulsory tax savings scheme in 2014.
The Police stressed that in the mentioned case, those who were charged and convicted of public nuisance had “deliberately marched through and disrupted an event by special needs children who were performing on stage”.
The Police spokesperson stated that it is regrettable that Reuters had decided to carry unsubstantiated allegations from the organisers and cited an unrelated case from 2014 in its reporting on the Speakers’ Corner.
“This was clearly an attempt to stoke fears about the use of the Speakers’ Corner and sow distrust of the police,” the Police said.
“A more objective reporting would have shown that the Speakers’ Corner has been and remains an avenue for Singaporeans to participate freely and responsibly in public speeches and demonstrations,” it added.
In response to the Police’s protest, Reuters added a new line to the article. “The police said that the six people involved in that incident were charged after disrupting another event being held on an adjacent lawn.”

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

正与另一业者洽商合作 Ofo获准延期移除脚车

迄今,共有三家共享脚车业者宣布退出新加坡市场。其中ofo是第二家宣布撤离新加坡市场的公司,接到新加坡陆路交通管理局发出移除市面上脚踏车的期限,但是ofo昨日向当局提出要求延长期限,已经获得批准。 共享脚车业者ofo今天发出声明,表示拟议和另一家业者合作,目前已经进入洽谈尾声,因此要求陆交局延长回收脚踏车期限。 陆交局指出,基于ofo从上个月14日开始,在QR码系统的推行方面取得进展,因此同意了后者延后移除脚踏车的申请。 陆交局表示,将会密切关注ofo情况,并且正在和ofo洽商,要求对方遵循多项条例。 没移除脚车就撤销执照 当局之前也曾要求ofo在本月13日之前做到有关要求,包括减少市面上的脚踏车数量、在13日零时之前移除所有脚踏车等,否则将撤销该公司执照。 但是在昨日(3月14日)仍然看到不少ofo脚车,一、两辆的随处停放。 根据《亚洲新闻台》报导指出,ofo已经裁退了本地运营团队,停止运作。Ofo的前职员也表示,1月31日是他们工作的最后一天。即表示,2月份开始,就再也没有人在新加坡负责搬移或维修ofo脚踏车。负责客户服务的员工也表示,公司负责人在他们被裁退前,就曾经吩咐他们停止回应客户在手机应用程序和社交媒体的询问和投诉了。 摩拜撤离影响华侨银行活动 另一家宣布退出新加坡市场的共享脚车业者,摩拜(Mobike),已经在星期一提出了申请。 此举却让原本将获得摩拜免费提供500辆脚车,即将在5月举行脚踏车大会的华侨银行感到措手不及。当局表示,如果没有替代摩拜撤离的方案,会影响该大会的参赛者退款。 另外两家共享脚车业者,SG…

无准证举办视讯会议聚会 法院裁定范国瀚有罪

新加坡法院今日裁定,社运份子范国瀚无准证举办集会,且拒绝签署口供,被判有罪。判刑日期被定在本月23日。 范国瀚也是社区行动网络(CAN)负责人、客工组织“情义之家”前执行董事。 他在2016年11月26日,在新民巷主办“公民抗命即社会运动”论坛,邀请香港“黄雨伞运动”中的学运领袖黄之锋,透过Skype与现场观众连线对谈交流。当时,范国瀚和主办人之一的Rachel Zeng认为对社会运动的健康讨论,并不会构成威胁,活动最后也平和地结束。 然而,范国瀚为此被控违反《公共秩序法》,该法要求有外国演讲者的活动,必须事先申请和得到警方许可。 警方告知范国瀚,即便是视讯集会也必须先申请准证。 在接受警方调查时,查案人员传召范国瀚问话,并在录完口供后,要求范国瀚确认签字。 范国瀚要求索取口供书的备份后,才肯签名。警方以口供书属于机密文件为由,拒绝他的要求,并表示,如果范国瀚不签名,可能会触犯法律。 根据我国法律,在公务人员的要求下、拒绝签名的违例者,可能面对长达3个月监禁或高达2500元罚款,或两者兼施。至于未经警方许可举办公开集会,则可被判处5千元罚款。 对于新加坡政府因为举办闭门视讯交流就起诉范国瀚的举动,黄之锋曾在脸书直批我国政府审查之举,“比中国大陆更离谱”,难以想象视讯会议办论坛也要经过警察审批。 “在私人空间进行闭门视讯交流,用逻辑来想也知属私人事务,质疑警方是否有提控之必要。 集会自由乃基本人权。但是在新加坡,公民为同一共识聚集却往往遭到政府的猜疑。集会只能在唯一地点进行,即便一人也能构成“非法集会”罪行。”…

面包夹香烟最新暗黑早餐? 面包内藏私烟闯关被抓包

“有人要试试香烟三文治吗?” 移民与关卡局在脸书分享一则趣事,本月8日,该局官员在兀兰关卡发现,在巴士站入境厅有旅客行迹可疑,于是趋前要求检查。 这位马来西亚籍52岁男子,带着四包面包,但官员打开后,却发现内有乾坤,面包片中共藏着32包走私烟! 有关男子在接受调查后,已转交给新加坡关税局(Singapore Custom)处置。 有网民表示没见过这么奇葩的走私香烟手段,令网民打开眼界。 不久前,当局也曾从货柜罗厘,在放置包装纸巾的箱子内藏有私烟。

“I’ve created all these jobs…”: PM Lee

Explaining why there are more foreign professionals in Singapore, Prime Minister Lee…