Source : Priyageetha Dia Facebook account.

An art student from Lasalle College of the Arts, Ms Priyageetha Dia, paved a staircase with gold foil at a Housing Board block in Jalan Besar.
Many netizens praised the artwork, saying that this is creativity at its best.
This is despite the fact that the Jalan Besar Town Council stated what she did was “unauthorised” and “not permissible”. But the town council has stated that it is reaching out to the art student to explore future collaboration.
A spokesperson for the Town Council told Today that it wants to “explore ways in which we may be able to work together” as it is “supportive of efforts by the community to enhance our living environment”.
Ms Priyageetha has admitted on her Facebook account on Tuesday (7 March) that she was the person behind the art, saying that the work has been on her mind for the past one month and that she was definitely apprehensive on realising it until two days ago.
“The process was an invigorating one though I was apprehensive of the consequences I may face,” she said.
Ms Priyageetha said that it took her five hours to get the work done.

“My practice deals with spaces that negotiate concepts on the sacred, secular and the profane. As such, I am intrigued with spaces that I have inhabited over the course of 25 years as a HDB dweller and thus it has prompted me to intervene away from the household and into public spaces,” the art student stated. But what constitutes public and private space? How does that apply along with the sacred etc.? And why gold? I would love to list down the conceptual reasoning of what the work is about but wouldn’t it make the work seem less interesting then?”
“But what constitutes public and private space? How does that apply along with the sacred etc.? And why gold? I would love to list down the conceptual reasoning of what the work is about but wouldn’t it make the work seem less interesting then?” she asked.
She then asked whether it is possible to draw a line between art and vandalism, as she considers this work as an art and not vandalism.
She then noted that though one would say about the legal system and its regulations but she believes that she did not deface anything, adding that what she did was to enhance the space and her surroundings.
“This work provokes. Provokes in all sense we are used to living the standard way of life, and all of a sudden something as glaring as gold negotiates the space. My work does not seek to obliterate a public space; vandalism in all sense has no respect for another individual,” said Ms Priyageetha.
She added, “I didn’t intend to please the public with my work but it was definitely a sense of satisfaction for me. After practising arts under the academy for almost 3 years, I needed to break away from that zone. What better way to make art and have it on display beyond the white cube,”
While it is believed that no Police complaints has been lodged, there were mixed comments on the incident by the resident who live around the area.
In an interview by Today, Ms Akiko Ler, 43, felt that such an act, if done on the artist’s own accord without seeking counsel from the town council, is considered vandalism, saying that residents here pay fees to keep the public space clean, so it is only fair that it is kept like how it was meant to be.
Mr Don Tan, 22, said that he is seeing it from both the perspective of the artist as well as the law, stating that it is a grey area because it does not affect people’s lives. However, he noted that it causes little trouble or inconvenience.
Another resident, Tiffany Tan, 22, said that the art is a “cool” thing.
She said that it will be quite sad if someone orders it to be taken down. However, she noted that even if it stays, the artwork may not be appreciated as much without proper recognition of it as an artwork.
“Someone might just treat it the same as any other stairway and spit on it,” she added.
Source : Priyageetha Dia Facebook account.
Source : Priyageetha Dia Facebook account.
Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Education: Charting our education reform

By Richmond Lee – It is strange in a way how the…

LTA implements additional safe distancing measures, rolls out safe distancing stickers in public transports

In light of the Government’s efforts to contain the spread of COVID-19…

【冠状病毒19】8月13日新增102例确诊人数

本地新增102例冠状病毒19确诊病例,回升三位数,包括五起社区病例和六起入境病例。 根据卫生部发表的文告,截至今天(13日)中午12点的新增病例有五例是社区病例,包括一名本地永久居民以及四名工作证件持有者;六例入境病例,所有入境病例在入境后开始履行居家通知。 其余新增病例均为隔离中的工作准证持有人。本地病例总数目前累计5万5497起。 当局正在搜集新病例的详情,并会在今晚提供更多细节。

王瑞杰称工程师成未来经济发展关键 民众揭学生不选工程系原因

上周,副总理王瑞杰受邀参加第53界工程师学会晚宴,表示工程师将会是未来经济发展中关键的角色。对此民众刘福添(Liu Fook Thim译音)则持相反意见,并揭露新加坡学生如今都不会选择修读工程系的原因。 刘先生在《海峡时报》论坛中以《为何工程系不再受欢迎》文章揭示,新加坡学生如今都比较不愿意报读工程系。 “不幸的是,如今新加坡人不再将工程学作为职业,而工程学位不再如医学或法律学位那般受欢迎。” 首先,工程界同业间如一盘散沙,且欠缺包容性和缺乏自我管理。再者,执业工程师不需向工程师协会注册。 如工程师卷入麻烦如淡滨泥高架桥断裂事故,工程师学会也没介入。不像新加坡医疗理事会或法律协会,工程师未有明确的自我规范管理。 其次,刘先生也指出,医学和法律界限制外籍人士在本地执业,但工程师却没有任何限制。即指在工程界中,会出现更多如外籍工程师,比起在国内接受严格教育多年,且毕业于南洋理工大学的国内工程师而言,许多雇主却更愿录用外国工程师。 但他们似乎不知道,其实南洋理工大学的工程系,才是亚洲顶尖之一。 压低本土工程师薪资 事实上,外籍工程师的流入进一步压低了工程师的薪水,因为他们愿意接受更低工资,使得国内工程行业似乎前景黯淡。 刘先生表示,“除非将以上问题解决了,否则即便工程师职业再如何高尚,国人仍会对这份工作敬而远之。”…