• About Us
    • Fact Checking Policy
    • Ownership & funding information
    • Volunteer
  • Subscribe
  • Letter submission
    • Submissions Policy
  • Contact Us
The Online Citizen Asia
  • Opinion
    • Editorial
    • Commentaries
    • Letters
    • Comments
  • Current Affairs
    • Singapore
    • Malaysia
    • Indonesia
    • China
    • ASEAN
    • Asia
    • International
  • Finance
    • Economics
    • Labour
    • Property
    • Business
  • Community
    • Arts & Culture
    • Consumer Watch
    • NGO
    • Lifestyle
    • Travel
  • Politics
    • Civil Society
    • Parliament
    • Transport
    • Education
    • Environment
    • Health
    • Housing
  • Law & Order
    • Legislation
    • Court Cases
No Result
View All Result
  • Opinion
    • Editorial
    • Commentaries
    • Letters
    • Comments
  • Current Affairs
    • Singapore
    • Malaysia
    • Indonesia
    • China
    • ASEAN
    • Asia
    • International
  • Finance
    • Economics
    • Labour
    • Property
    • Business
  • Community
    • Arts & Culture
    • Consumer Watch
    • NGO
    • Lifestyle
    • Travel
  • Politics
    • Civil Society
    • Parliament
    • Transport
    • Education
    • Environment
    • Health
    • Housing
  • Law & Order
    • Legislation
    • Court Cases
No Result
View All Result
The Online Citizen Asia
No Result
View All Result

Water price debate: Long run marginal cost way of determining water price seriously flawed

by onlinecitizen
07/03/2017
in Commentaries
Reading Time: 7 mins read
0

(Photo - Hyflux)

By Colin
I refer to the 4 Mar 2017 Online Citizen letter “More on justifications for water price increase”.

Bullshit 1: Can’t refute, so call it irrelevant

Prof Ng could give no reply to the fact that more than half of the water we consume experienced little or no inflation having been fixed at 3 cents per 1000 gallons all this while.  Since half of our water experienced little or no inflation, Prof Ng has no basis to compare it with 30% general inflation and insist that this water should be inflated 30% as well.  What Prof Ng cannot refute, he calls it irrelevant.  That’s all he can do.

Bullshit 2: Government says save water means water is underpriced

According to Minister Chan Chun Sing, water is an existential issue needed for our survival (Channel News Asia, 1 Mar 2017).  Hence, the government’s exhortation for water to be saved need not necessarily have anything to do with it being underpriced but rather something to do with our survival.  Surely under pricing is not a matter of existence or survival is it?  Or perhaps Prof Ng thinks Minister Chan is wrong?

Bullshit 3: Water revenues not enough for infrastructure investment

Much of the infrastructure investment is to support future population and industry growth.  The proper appraisal for these infrastructure investments should be the incremental revenue from future industries and businesses less cost of these additional infrastructure investments weighed against an appropriate cost of capital such as GIC 6.1% nominal returns (http://www.gic.com.sg/report/report-2014-2015/investment_report.html, in USD).  Infrastructure investment can only make sense if it can yield more than 6.1% annual returns.  If it can, then there is no need to increase water prices.  If it cannot, then it is better to park the money with GIC and earn 6.1% instead.

Bullshit 4: Economics

Long run marginal costing has one problem – where is the demand curve?  Long run marginal cost alone is insufficient.  Without the demand curve, there is no way of working out the equilibrium market efficient price.

The government can plan for the quantity demanded in future just as it planned for the quantity demanded today.  But quantity demanded doesn’t constitute the demand curve.  There is no price information on consumers’ willingness to spend on water.  The current water price is a dictated price which is not necessarily the price consumers are willing to pay at the current quantity demanded.

Since water demand is highly inelastic, in the worst case scenario where water demand is perfectly inelastic, it would be impossible to determine exactly what price consumers are willing to pay for the present quantity demanded.

As long run marginal costing has been in place since 1997 (http://www.financialexpress.com/opinion/singapore-shows-the-way-on-water/63431/), it can be assumed that the current pricing is already at the current long run marginal cost.  So when water planners move Singapore from the current long run marginal cost to the next long run marginal cost through intensive infrastructure investment, it should be accompanied by a rightward shift of the demand curve through population and industry increases.  This rightward shift of the demand curve will lead to higher demand curves which will lead to an increase in the willingness of existing consumers to pay for water.

Consumer surplus is calculated based on the area between the demand curve and the price line.  So when the demand curve shifts right or up, there is an increase in consumer surplus for existing consumers.  This implies that existing consumers now derive more benefit from the fact that there are now more consumers, greater quantity of water supplied and higher price to pay for water.  But that’s not how normal consumers feel.  When population increases, water supply is increased and people pay more for water, the average consumer doesn’t feel happier about it nor derive more benefit from it.

This should show how nebulous the consumer surplus concept is when applied to water demand.  Since market efficiency and long run marginal costing cannot be separated from the concept of consumer surplus which is nebulous when applied to water demand, the whole long run marginal cost way of determining water price is seriously flawed.

Bullshit 5: Government will lessen increases in other areas

Prof Ng claims that the additional money that government makes from supplying water will lessen increases in taxes, charges and prices of other things.  That again may not necessarily be true.  The extra money that the government gains can simply go into their pockets and disappear into government reserves only to reappear as losses in government investments.

Bullshit 6: More roti prata

Prof Ng continues to adhere to his roti prata style of heads he wins, tails you lose argument that European cities not only have higher water prices, they also under price water according to long term marginal costs.  But as mentioned earlier, long term marginal costing has serious flaws when applied to water pricing.  Also, do European cities have 50% fresh water capped at 3 cents per 1,000 gallons?  Why not compare with Asian cities?

Prof Ng also mentions that only 1% of water consumed is for drinking.  Is Prof Ng suggesting that water is not an existential problem as Minister Chan Chun Sing insisted since we can get more than enough drinking water from our own reservoirs?  Or perhaps both Prof Ng and Minister Chan think that flushing the toilet is also an existential problem?

Bullshit 7: Buries his head in investment costs only

Prof Ng continues to ignore the high running costs of desalination and chooses instead to bury his head in capital investment only.  According to Hyflux (Hyflux named preferred bidder for Tuas II desalination plant, Singapore, 7 Mar 2011, page 8), the amortised capital cost of the desalination plant is only 30% of operating costs.  No details are given on the number of years of amortisation but by considering a longer time period, the share of capital cost may be even lower.  Hence, Prof Ng’s focus on spreading capital costs over a larger population can only apply to at most 30% of desalination costs only.

Again, Prof Ng brushes off high running costs as irrelevant.  As the exchanges continue, more and more of Prof Ng’s answers become condensed into one word – irrelevant, rather than effective rebuttals.

Bullshit 8: Higher prices benefit Singaporeans

Prof Ng claims that higher prices due to more people fighting for limited resources will accrue mostly to Singaporeans and the government and is only bad for non asset holders.

Correction Prof Ng, since the government owns most of the land in Singapore, higher prices will accrue mostly to the government rather than to the people.  Secondly, the children of Singaporeans are non asset holders so this is bad for our children.  Our gain will be their loss so there will be no net gain for Singaporean families with many children.  Thirdly, there is a sizeable population of foreigners, PRs or otherwise, who also benefit from higher prices.  Many of them have sold their houses back to Singaporeans at much higher prices and emigrated to the West, taking their gains (our losses) with them.  So it is hard to say that Singaporeans (not including the government) has benefitted.

Prof Ng says that higher population leads to lower per head costs of defence and other goods.  Is the per head cost of housing lower now due to higher population?  Between 1991 and 2015, non-landed private residential price index rose from 42.8 to 137.4 while population increased from 3.1 million to 5.6 million.  Per head price increased from 13.8 per million to 24.5 per million, it didn’t decrease.

For just US$7.50 a month, sign up as a subscriber on The Online Citizen Asia (and enjoy ads-free experience on our site) to support our mission to transform TOC into an alternative mainstream press.

Related Posts

Singapore warns slower economic growth in 2023
Labour

Less than 1 in 10 jobs created in first three quarters of 2022 went to Singaporeans?

28/01/2023
Peru Congress rejects president’s plan for early elections
AFP

Peru Congress rejects president’s plan for early elections

28/01/2023
UMNO purging members as it sacks former health minister Khairy and suspended ex-defence minister Hishammuddin
Malaysia

UMNO purging members as it sacks former health minister Khairy and suspended ex-defence minister Hishammuddin

28/01/2023
WHO panel in talks on COVID emergency status
AFP

WHO panel in talks on COVID emergency status

27/01/2023
AFP

Two years after Myanmar coup, UN says situation ‘catastrophic’

27/01/2023
Grab driver supposedly earned $5,227.82 in a week prior CNY, netizens voice worries over his health
Community

Grab driver supposedly earned $5,227.82 in a week prior CNY, netizens voice worries over his health

27/01/2023
Subscribe
Connect withD
Login
I allow to create an account
When you login first time using a Social Login button, we collect your account public profile information shared by Social Login provider, based on your privacy settings. We also get your email address to automatically create an account for you in our website. Once your account is created, you'll be logged-in to this account.
DisagreeAgree
Notify of
Connect withD
I allow to create an account
When you login first time using a Social Login button, we collect your account public profile information shared by Social Login provider, based on your privacy settings. We also get your email address to automatically create an account for you in our website. Once your account is created, you'll be logged-in to this account.
DisagreeAgree
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Latest posts

Singapore warns slower economic growth in 2023

Less than 1 in 10 jobs created in first three quarters of 2022 went to Singaporeans?

28/01/2023
Peru Congress rejects president’s plan for early elections

Peru Congress rejects president’s plan for early elections

28/01/2023
UMNO purging members as it sacks former health minister Khairy and suspended ex-defence minister Hishammuddin

UMNO purging members as it sacks former health minister Khairy and suspended ex-defence minister Hishammuddin

28/01/2023
WHO panel in talks on COVID emergency status

WHO panel in talks on COVID emergency status

27/01/2023

Two years after Myanmar coup, UN says situation ‘catastrophic’

27/01/2023
Grab driver supposedly earned $5,227.82 in a week prior CNY, netizens voice worries over his health

Grab driver supposedly earned $5,227.82 in a week prior CNY, netizens voice worries over his health

27/01/2023
Philippines to appeal ICC resumption of drug war probe

ICC grants new inquiry into Manila’s deadly ‘war on drugs’

27/01/2023
Minister refutes claims of Malaysia consulting Singapore on housing policy due to its inefficient civil service

Minister refutes claims of Malaysia consulting Singapore on housing policy due to its inefficient civil service

27/01/2023

Trending posts

Two Indian nationals paid about S$330 and S$730 respectively for forged certificates submitted in their S-Pass application

MOM found issuing EPs meant for foreign PMETs to PRC waitress and general worker

by Correspondent
26/01/2023
36

...

Earning only S$400 a month, delivery-rider turned hawker threw in the towel after two years of running a rojak stall

Earning only S$400 a month, delivery-rider turned hawker threw in the towel after two years of running a rojak stall

by Yee Loon
26/01/2023
24

...

Ho Ching breaks silence over Temasek’s write down of its US$275 million investment in FTX, says it “can afford to be contrarian”

US regulator questions VCs’ due diligence work prior to investing in FTX; Ho Ching says Temasek can afford to be contrarian

by The Online Citizen
24/01/2023
28

...

Indian rupee falls 60% since signing of CECA while Singapore becomes top investor in India

by Correspondent
25/01/2023
55

...

Temasek and GIC reportedly in talks with Adani Group accused of “brazen” market manipulation and accounting fraud

Temasek and GIC reportedly in talks with Adani Group accused of “brazen” market manipulation and accounting fraud

by The Online Citizen
26/01/2023
46

...

Water price debate: Long run marginal cost way of determining water price seriously flawed

by onlinecitizen
07/03/2017
0

...

March 2017
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031  
« Feb   Apr »
  • About Us
  • Subscribe
  • Letter submission
  • Contact Us

© 2006 - 2021 The Online Citizen

No Result
View All Result
  • Opinion
    • Editorial
    • Commentaries
    • Comments
  • Current Affairs
    • Malaysia
    • Indonesia
    • China
    • ASEAN
    • Asia
    • International
  • Finance
    • Economics
    • Labour
    • Property
    • Business
  • Community
    • Civil Society
    • Arts & Culture
    • Consumer Watch
    • NGO
  • Politics
    • Parliament
    • Transport
    • Education
    • Environment
    • Health
    • Housing
  • Law & Order
    • Legislation
    • Court Cases
  • Lifestyle
    • Travel
  • Subscribers login

© 2006 - 2021 The Online Citizen

wpDiscuz