I refer to the article “Indranee: ‘Perfectly acceptable’ for Attorney-Generals to be politicians in some countries” (Yahoo News, Mar 3).
It states that “Many countries see it as “perfectly proper” to have an Attorney-General (AG) who is a politician, said Senior Minister of State, Ministry of Finance and Ministry of Law, Indranee Rajah on Friday (3 March).

Indranee was responding to comments by Workers’ Party Member of Parliament Sylvia Lim in Parliament, who said that filling a constitutional post in an organ of state with a party politician is “not ideal”.

Speaking during the Committee of Supply (COS) debate, Lim referred to the recent appointment of former PAP MP Hri Kumar Nair as Deputy Attorney-General for a term of three years with effect from 1 March 2017.  Hri Kumar is the first ever former politician in Singapore to be appointed to the role.

Lim said the appointment “carries a risk of undermining public confidence in the AGC’s stated mission of fair and independent prosecutions, and it is a risk that is best avoided.”

But Indranee pointed out that it is ultimately the courts that decide on the verdict of a case. “While the AG takes a position on whether to prosecute, it is the court that eventually decides on innocence or guilt. That is why in many countries it is perfectly acceptable for the AG to be a politician,” she said.
Same same but different

Indranee cited examples of how politicians in other countries such as the UK, Australia and the US have AGs who are current politicians.  She said, “In the UK, the AG is a cabinet minister. He is also the chief legal advisor and also oversees the prosecution service. Australia has a similar system – the AG is a member of the legislature…In the US, the current AG…resigned from the Senate just before being appointed AG and continues to be a member of the Republican Party.”

Indranee also lauded Hri Kumar’s acceptance of the deputy AG position “despite the considerable personal and financial cost to him”.

“He also now earns significantly less than what he used to earn. We should be grateful that a person of such standing has agreed to dedicate himself to the public cause.””

Arguably, the difference between the USA, UK and Australia, may be that they are vibrant “non-one-party dominant” in Parliament – political systems.
Record of making life difficult for opposition

Also, they may not have our arguably checkered historical record of “making life difficult” for the opposition. (Note: I am a resident of Aljunied – and thus may naturally have an interest in such matters)

Some examples may arguably be highlighted in some of the following, over the years:

Also, the USA, UK and Australia may arguably have a more vibrant free press at 41st, 38th and 25th respectively, given that our Press Freedom ranking is at its lowest ever – at 154th.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Dengue cases rose to 108 cases after six consecutive weeks of decline

Dengue cases saw another hiked this week to 108 cases after six…

Nonsensical sign for playground emerges online again?

Imagine walking into a restaurant to have a meal and you stumble…

总理等已率先发表演说 民主党不满选举局仍未阐明竞选活动细节

针对昨日(8日)选举局一口气公布有关网络付费选举广告,以及选民投票的安全措施之修订条规。 但是,竞选活动相关细节,该局却称需视届时冠病疫情而定。最坏情况“不比选举令状颁布的日子迟”。 对此,民主党发文告抨击,似乎显示行动党政府有意让大选对自身更有利,而仓促要召开选举,也显然未顾及民众的公共健康和安全。 总理等率先发表演说 该党文告也指,一些行动党国会议员,即使在阻断措施期间,已“变相”开始增加曝光率。再者,包括总理等执政党重量级人物,也会在未来数周个别发表演说。 要平衡上述这些不公平趋势,民主党呼吁应将大选提名日,定在颁布选举令状的至少十天后,让各政党能为他们的竞选活动作安排,包括义工和竞选代理(polling agent)的防疫用品。 同时,该党也重申21日的竞选期,让重要课题能够获得辩论;各政党能在电视台参与辩论、曝光等。 另一方面,新加坡人民党主席乔立盟也要求应阐明竞选条例;前进党则欢迎,选举局增加候选人和政党的电视竞选广播时间,该党计划充分利用这些时段,惟也要求选举局需说明如何计算这些额外广播时间。

数度拉扯狗绳将狗吊起 男子被判罚款1万元

一名男子数度拉扯狗绳,还不断虐待宠物,强行将狗吊起,更勒住狗的脖子,将其压在地面上,种种行为被拍下,被判罚款1万元。 案情显示,该虐待宠物事件发生于去年2月15日晚上10点,以及同年3月9日傍晚6点左右,位于义顺环路第115A座附近,被告为38岁的男子陈鑫,被指对宠物雌狮子狗蓄意造成伤害,目前面临两项动物和飞禽法令指控。 目击者分别在上述地点两度发生虐狗,并使用手机拍摄下来,并通报当时的农粮兽医局(现被已编入国家公园局),同时也上传到网上,引起许多网民的关注,当局也随即进行调查。 据悉,当局执法人员造访被告住家时,又看见被告与其他宠物狗,并确认它们正是视频中的男子与宠物狗。 经进一步调查后确认当天(2月15日)晚上10点左右,被告正与宠物正在散步,突然猛力拉扯狗绳数次,让宠物狗后退一至两米。 被告解释,当时他的狗一直冲向前,而他则称是为了将它拉回来。 不仅如此,去年3月9日傍晚6点左右,被告又再次对宠物狗暴力虐打,先是踢狗的胸膛,再将狗链把它从原本休息的座位上,吊起来距离50公分的地面,最后在将它吊会原本的位置上,更抓着它的颈部按在位置上长达三秒。 对此,被告也称是为了想要让宠物挪动位置,于是很“小力”将狗压着,但时间很短。而检方则认为,事发当时被告都正在使用手机,并没有给予狗狗太多的关注,所以这样的行为并不合理。 检方表示,目前宠物狗已找到新的栖身之地,也没有形成永久性伤势。 针对此事,被告也于昨日下午认罪,被判罚款1万元,并于一年内不得养宠物。 结果宣判后,被告也提及自己是首次养狗,并不知道自己犯错,还询及领养宠物的人是否曾接受事前训练,避免再次犯错。