Infographic released by SMRT explaining the fatal accident along the East-West Line on 22 March (Source : SMRT).

Singapore Mass Rapid Transit (SMRT) Trains was fined S$400,000 on Tuesday (28 February) for safety lapses leading to an incident where two of its trainees were hit by an oncoming train last year.
The two trainees are Nasrulhudin Najumudin, 26, and Muhammad Asyraf Ahmad Buhari, 24, who had earlier joined SMRT in January 2016. They were undergoing on-the-job training when they were hit by an oncoming train. Permission to access the tracks was authorised.
There were 15 employees in the team who went on track to investigate a possible fault involving a signalling device on the tracks. Mr Lim Say Heng, 47, who was the first in line, managed to escape on time when the train approached. However, Nasrulhudin and Asyraf, who were on the second and third in line failed to react on time.
Although stating that the staff followed its standard procedure at the beginning, SMRT later admitted after the accident that maintenance staff had not followed safety procedures.
SMRT was charged under Section 12 of the Workplace Safety and Health Act.
The Act states that it is the duty of every employer to take measures necessary to ensure the safety and health of employees at work so far as is reasonably practicable.
The charge sheet wrote that the company had failed to ensure that its employees complied with approved operating procedures when accessing the track, as well as the procedures practised by staff that day to access the tracks passed safety audits, were documented and disseminated.
Deputy Public Prosecutor Anandan Bala stated during the Court today that these were “systemic and prolonged” breaches, noting that this is not a one-off incident.
He stressed that the breach was committed by workmen on the ground and station managers with approval from Operations Control Centre.
The prosecution said that even though SMRT had taken remedial measures post-incident, these measures are not difficult to implement and should have been in place years ago.
Representing the rail operator, Senior Counsel Andre Maniam, argued that the actions taken on the ground were not approved or authorised by SMRT senior management.
District Judge Chay Yuen Fatt said that it was highly disconcerting that the failures were systemic and had occurred on many levels in delivering the sentences.
He stressed that the procedures on the ground had evolved over time in a “haphazard fashion” despite safety protocols in place.
He said that employees were left to adopt whatever practice they deemed convenient,saying, “Official safety protocols on paper were either unknown to employees or completely disregarded.”
Two others have also been charged.
Teo Wee Kiat, 40, one of SMRT’s directors, was also charged under Section 48 (1) of the same Act. The Act states that should an offence be committed by a corporate body, an officer of this body shall be guilty of the offence and be liable to be punished. Teo faces a fine of up to $200,000 and/or a jail term of up to two years
While, Mr Lim was charged with causing death by a negligent act under the Penal Code. He is the officer-in-charge of the work party which was inspecting the tracks on the day of the fatal accident.
According to the charge sheet, he failed to ensure that the necessary safety measures were in place to make sure trains do not enter the train track while they were there. He faces a jail term of up to two years, a fine, or both, if found guilty.
Lim was dismissed last September due to the accident, according to Channel News Asia. On September, the public transport operator also dismissed two of its staff including the train driver, Rahmat Mohd, 49.
The National Transport Workers’ Union Executive Secretary Melvin Yong said the union would support Mr Lim and his family and ensure that he was fairly represented.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Online petition calls for cancellation of NDP 2021 celebration due to rising number of COVID-19 cases

An online petition has emerged on Change.org urging the Government to cancel…

武汉4月8日解封

自今年1月23日就实施封城的中国武汉市,将在下月8日解封。湖北省政府也宣布,明日起武汉市以外地区恢复对外交通。 自去年12月底以来,中国武汉开始出现不明肺炎病例,部分患者来自武汉市华南海鲜城(华南海鲜批发市场)经营户。 本身是武汉市中心医院眼科医生的李文亮,在去年12月30日和其他七名医生向外界发出防护预警。但此举却遭当地警方指责他“造谣”;此事后来也引来中国最高人民法院发文非议执法机构,对一切不完全符合事实的信息,都进行法律打击并无法律上必要。 截至1月22日夜间官方宣布仅湖北省的感染病例就已经上升至444例,其中武汉新增62例,死亡8例。有鉴于疫情严重,武汉市宣布封城,城市公交、地铁、轮渡、长途客运暂停运营,机场、火车站离汉信道暂时关闭。 不过,此时疫情已出现扩散国外的迹象。我国也在1月23日,出现首起武汉冠状病毒(COVID-19)确诊病例,确诊者是66岁的武汉男子,较后他37岁儿子也确诊,所幸后来成功治愈出院。 世界卫生组织在1月27日承认,低估了武汉冠状病毒的的致命性和对全球的威胁程度,并更正说,这种新型传染病对全球的威胁性由之前的“中度”调至“高度”威胁。 随后我国也在1月29日,限制过去14天内,到过湖北、或持有湖北护照的旅客入境、或在我国过境。当时官方表示,有约2000名曾到过湖北、或持湖北签发护照人士在狮城,不过有较高风险和最近曾到过湖北的人士,都会被隔离。 五天零确诊后,一名医生感染 迄今为止,中国累计确诊病例达8万1773例,累计治愈病例7万3300例,死亡病例3千283人。 尽管早前武汉宣称五天无新增病例,不过当地湖北省人民医院院本部的一名医生却成为新增确诊。武汉市卫生健康委员会官网指该医生近期在医院上班,不排除院内感染。

外交部:不允国外政治活动 韩国瑜妻李佳芬访狮城行程取消

今日(26日)新加坡外交部发文告表示,我国政府不允许国外的政治活动在我国进行,包括竞选和募款活动,且对所有方面人士都奉行一致政策,要求任何到我国的访客都要遵守我国法律。 事缘台湾国民党总统参选人韩国瑜的妻子李佳芬,原定25日至28日出访东南亚新马印三国,不过昨日抵达印尼后却突然取消新加坡行程。 韩国瑜竞选办公室较后解释,由于新加坡政府高度关注涉及政治议题聚会,且也有维安和警力安排工作考量,所以只得暂缓前来新加坡的行程。 2020年台湾总统大选临近,李佳芬也代表丈夫出访,试图争取海外台侨支持。她将在短短三日行程中拜访印尼和马来西亚。此前在17日至20日已前往柬埔寨和曼谷参观台商工厂。 据了解,在印尼雅加达的活动上,有当地侨胞穿着“青天白日满地红”中华民国旗帜式样T恤,迎接李佳芬。

分享经过 呼吁民众警惕 网友揭商业骗局防祖母遭殃

上周五(6月28日),一名网民在脸书上分享,出现出售神奇“电椅”、专攻老年人市场的可疑“骗局”,害他知识水平不高的祖母也差点遭殃。 网友Jeryl Ng(后简称Jeryl)的祖母,差点成为这宗医疗骗局的受害者,为此Jeryl将有关的经过写在帖文上,希望能提醒大家和其他年长者,否则他们的储蓄或许就被骗了。 Jeryl在帖文中说道,他的祖母是透过邻居友人的介绍,才接触到这个商业骗局。他们指这种神奇 “电椅” 能治百病,如中风、糖尿病、关节炎甚至癌症。 销售员指“电椅”可当传家宝 然而,这电椅的售价非常昂贵,就连最基本型号都要价2万6000元,与网友祖母交谈的销售员更强调,这张电椅是一张“可以传承给后几代人的传家宝”。 老人家因此被说服了,她的银行户口中还有些钱,她可以在两个月内取回有关数额。 在得知此事件后,Jeryl担心这是一个骗局,并希望能够在祖母花钱并后悔之前,找到帮助她的方法。因此,他先向祖母了解来龙去脉。 分店设免费使用时段 祖母三个月来几乎从未缺席到访有关“神奇电椅”的勿洛分店。他还了解到,有关公司首先告诉所有的客户,在该中心使用电椅是免费的,客户可以随时来用。…