(Photo – Business Times)

by Teo Soh Lung
The NewPaper today has two interesting articles. The first is “Managing water demand can help too” by Martin Stavenhagen, Joost Buurman & Cecilia Tortajada.
I like the information on water consumption of the European Union, how they conserve water and how much an individual consumes each day. The average for them is “around 130 to below 100 litres a person a day”. A Singaporean on the other hand consumes 151 litres a day. Out of curiosity, I calculated my own average and arrived at about 110 litre a day. I can still improve on this average, like not mopping the floor unless it really feels bad when my bare feet walk on it! Or I could walk with home slippers and don’t feel the dirt which is quite a good idea as I am not one who enjoys house cleaning!
Another article on the same page is “Tiered water pricing could soften blow” by Ronnie Lim Ah Bee. He suggests a four-tier water pricing system where a frugal consumer will not be penalised. It is very easy to find out who consumes more water than others as our water bills provide nice graphs every month. I agree with the writer.
The right to clean water is a basic human right. We need water to live. The government’s across the board increase of 30% on the cost of water has serious consequences for everyone. The coffee shops are already charging 30 cents per cup of warm water. I don’t believe they will not increase the price in the near future.
We already pay tax on water consumption. Minister Heng Swee Keat assures us there are cash rebates, GST vouchers etc and an additional sum of more than $850 million will be provided for the poor. But why make the poor depend on handouts? And what about those who don’t qualify for any rebate or handouts? Why raise cost for all and then help some to pay part of this cost? Why not just tax the culprits who waste water which can be done easily?
Taxing all is a no brainer solution to encouraging people to save water and to help the private water company make more money. It just shows how bankrupt our government is today. Collective punishment is never a solution to a problem.
function 8-1
Function 8 - 2

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

I am absolutely disappointed with report: WP’s 2011 candidate for Jooo Chiat

The Workers’ Party’s candidate for Joo Chiat single-member constituency (SMC) in the…

【冠状病毒19】自阻断措施以来 肉贩多次没戴好口罩接警告信

盛港巴刹及美食广场(Kopitiam Square)一肉贩在工作时,没有将口罩戴好,接获该广场当局所发出的警告信。 据《Stomp》报导,除了肉贩,该摊位的工作人员也接到了警告信。 据网民T分享的照片中,只见该肉贩直降口罩遮住下巴,且并非一、两次违规没戴好。 T指出,该肉贩除了戴好口罩,在处理食品时,也不戴手套。 “无论我几时到该广场,都会看到他没戴好口罩。当他和别人交谈时,口罩总是在下巴部位。” “这情况已经发生数个月了,自6月的阻断措施开始,我就看到是这样了。” 肉摊的其他工作人员都有正确戴好口罩。 受询问时,广场发言人感谢网民的反馈,并表示已经完成相关的调查。“相关人员已接获口头警告,而摊位职员和持牌人都接到了警告信。” 当局表示,除了加强监督,当局也向所有的摊位租户发出卫生提醒函,促请大家严格遵守所有的安全管理措施。 “我们很抱歉对民众带来不便。请放心,我们认真看待任何不遵守安全管理措施的情况,并且会立即采取对付行动。” 新加坡食品局也指出,目前餐饮场所营业者必须执行安全管理措施,并准守冠状病毒19临时措施法令。“这包括强制要求每个出门在外的民众都必须带上口罩,遮住鼻子和嘴巴,除了用餐和饮水的时候。”…

年轻人发起本土首个气候集会 两千群众以行为艺术吁政府正视环境问题

昨日,年轻人自发发起的新加坡气候集会(SG Climate Rally)成功在芳林公园举行,吸引近两千群众出席,旨在吁求政府在应对气候危机上采取更有力的措施。 这也是在我国首次举办的气候集会。 有别于严肃的政治诉求,这场集会也增添适合亲子互动的活动,例如介绍环境问题的流动小图书馆、人体彩绘小站、讲述森林消失问题的卡牌游戏,讲述地球的故事等等。 现场一个“写明信片给议员”的柜台颇为引人注目,参与者可以写明信片,寄给他们选区的议员,质询诸如烟霾、碳税、石油能源等等议题,这些明信片将在明日寄出。 集体行为艺术警示环境公害 活动现场由数名关注环境议题的新加坡人致词,最小的演讲者是11岁的Oliver Chua。活动进行到傍晚六点,最后主办方邀请参与者一同进行集体行为艺术,如骨牌效应般倒下。 倒下的集会者代表那些因为环境公害消失的生命或物种,警示人们环境问题的伤害,无人幸免。 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ySk6AgQZxZM 询及未来的动向,主办当局称将继续维持动力以将他们的号召付诸行动,包括呼吁新加坡政府,依据跨政府气候变化委员会报考,削减我国的碳排放量,同时完全退出对污染行业的投资。…

政府宣布40万低收入家庭领补助券 乔立盟暗讽“宣布得真是时候”

日前,政府宣布40万户较低收入家庭,本月25日起至12月1日,可到民众俱乐部和联络所,领取价值50元的社区理事会生活补助券。 这些补助券可用来到邻里商店和小贩摊位换取餐饮、生活必需品及服务。 上述“社理会生活补助券计划”(CDC Vouchers Scheme),价值2000万元,当局声称是为了在疫情艰难时期,协助低收入家庭减轻生活费负担,同时扶持邻里店家和小贩。 对此,人民党主席乔立盟暗讽上述宣布时机“真是时候”。 尽管乔立盟认同,需扶持小商贩和帮助有需要的群体,但也质疑当局宣布的时机和分配补助券的方法。 既然可以致函这些合格家庭,通知上述政府优惠。但考量到目前仍是疫情期间,乔立盟也质疑,为何不能透过邮寄或电邮等方式,把补助券交到这批民众手上,非得要让他们到民众俱乐部和联络所排队群聚? 再者,他也提出分派方式也应考量到家庭人数和收入水平。