I refer to the article “Private school closures in Singapore hit record high last year” (Straits Times, Feb 9).
Record no. of private schools closed
It states that “A record number of private schools shut down last year, continuing the shakedown in a sector that once headlined Singapore’s ambition to be an education hub.
Even more are expected to exit the scene this year, as the authorities prepare to enforce new and stricter rules.
Last year, 25 private schools deregistered with the Committee for Private Education (CPE), including big names such as Nanyang Education Institute and M2 Academy, which opened with a bang in Orchard Road just three years ago. In 2015, 17 schools shut down.
Could not meet the standards?
There are 293 registered private schools currently – the first time that the number has dropped below 300 since 2012, when tough new rules weeded out hundreds that could not meet the standards required of them.
Global Schoolhouse in Singapore?
The latest bloodletting in the sector means that the plan of building a Global Schoolhouse in Singapore, which aimed to enrol 150,000 foreign students by 2015, has effectively been shelved.
Students dropped from 135,000 to less than 100,000?
The current student enrolment figures at private schools are not available, but figures reported in 2015 – 77,000 locals and 29,000 foreigners – already showed a drop in numbers.
Media reports five years ago said there were about 100,000 locals and about 35,000 foreigners enrolled in privately run schools.”
World renowned schools also closed?
Whilst I can understand the explanation that many low quality schools had to close because “could not meet the standards required of them” – why is it arguably, that so many world renowned schools have also closed in Singapore?
For example:

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

陈振声称需赋权人民行动党 展现“正向稳定”政治因素吸引外资

贸工部长陈振声认为,在来届选举新加坡必须先向世界展示更具正向稳定的信号,吸引更多更强大的经济投资,创造良好的就业机会。 周一(11日)陈振声接受《亚洲新闻台》的采访透露,新加坡必须向世界发出相对“正向的信号”,激发投资者对新加坡的信心,以此吸引更强大的投资,制造就业机会,以让新加坡人能够安然度过低靡时刻。 他强调,纵观许多并列第一世界的国家具有多元化的政治体系,并且能够赖以生存,倘若没有强劲的经济表现、强大的投资和良好的就业机会,一个支离破碎的政治体系也会体现出缺点。 “所以,在来届选举中,我们不仅要向自己,而且要面向世界发出“正向强大”的信号,我们才能借此攀升,与竞争对手拉远距离。” 因此,陈振声表示,目前首要任务即是授权于人民行动党,告诉国际社会行动党是长期存在,即指新加坡是稳定和连贯的,同时行动党也会执行与实现所有的承诺。 他也表明,若新加坡人投向一个“无法协调分歧与带领新加坡前进”的政治制度,新加坡社会的凝聚力将会分散,更可能导致分裂的出现。 吸引外资,意味着创造更多就业机会? 尽管如此,引进外资就意味着创造更多的机会吗?我们可以从中检讨,例如樟宜商业园中也吸引大量印度软件公司,它看似为我国创造就业机会,但我们可以从中发现,他们大量聘雇印度籍工程师。 随着新加坡人的抱怨连连,情况逐渐恶化,以至于政府不得不介入调解,让这些公司聘雇更多外国人。 政府的介入也连带影响了于新加坡工作的印度专业人员,由于工作签证的条件变得严苛,导致工作签证的派发变得相当零散,甚至促使印度政府以违反贸易协定向新加坡政府投诉。 据报道,部分印度IT公司均受到影响如HCL、TCS、Infosys、Wipro、Cognizant和L&T信息技术。 印度贸易组织(Nasscom)投诉,“签证问题已拖延一段时间,自2016…

总理称两周后晋第三阶段 群聚人数增至八人

新加坡总理李显龙指出,本地将在本月28日,步入解封第三阶段,群聚人数也从目前的五人,增至八人。 届时可允许八人一同用餐,或方便再佳节期间拜访亲友。但他提醒,冠病仍未被打败,防疫工作仍在持续,且许多国家疫情仍严重,现在仍不是办大型聚会的时候。 一些国家面对第三、第四波疫情,边境仍管制。但我国依靠贸易和旅游业生存,若边境关闭越久,永久失去国际枢纽地位的风险越大。唯一的选项,就是安全、谨慎地重开边境。 他说仍需要做好预防措施,避免新的感染或疫情。 李显龙于今日傍晚5时发表全国讲话,向国人汇报有关防疫冠病疫情的最新进展,及明年展望。这也是自爆发疫情以来,他第六次针对疫情形势发表全国讲话。 他提及,今年3至4月,我国每日新增病例超过1千例,但如今多日已无本土感染病例,大家也难忘4月到5月阻断措施期间的情况。国人付出了巨大努力把疫情控制了下来。  

Community groups and civil societies call for end of investigation into youth climate activists; urge gov't to serious reconsider public assembly laws

In an open letter today (14 April), various community groups and civil…

失智老翁离逝 生前仍牢记投工人党

工人党党魁毕丹星昨日在脸书分享,惊悉一名九旬年长支持者离逝。这名支持者长期来支持工人党,惟过去15年时间患上失智。 在本届选举,这名支持者仍有意投票,但家属考量到他的状况每况愈下都感到担心,老人家是否有能力履行公民责任? 于是,家属便为他做个小测验。画了仿拟的选票,让老人家画“X”。 老人家共做了三次测验,但三次都清楚表达了自己的意愿。据了解毕丹星也出席了这名年长支持者的丧礼,并对家属致哀。 Never Forgotten ———————- Terence got in touch with…