Dr Chee Soon Juan, the Secretary-General of Singapore Democratic Party (SDP), commented on the statement by Education Minister (Higher Education and Skills) Ong Ye Kung who stated that Singapore is a small country, so it has to stay agile, a one-party system may give Singapore its best shot at success.
At the annual Institute of Policy Studies’ Singapore Perspectives conference on 23 January, the Education Minister pointed out at the possible long-term risks for Singapore if Singapore has a multi-party system, saying, “50 years from now, if we have a multi-party system, what will define the key political difference between parties? What is the partisan line? Is it over the extent to which we should subsidise public services, healthcare and social assistance? If that is so, it may well be something we can manage.”
“What if it is over something more sinister that divide Singapore by race, language or religion? As we all know politics, race and religion is a toxic mix,” he added.
Dr Chee said that it is frightening that at this juncture of Singapore’s development and with a rapidly changing world Singaporeans face, Ministers like Ong Ye Kung, who is a Member of Parliament from People’s Action Party (PAP), still cling on to the out-dated and reality-free view that the one-party rule is the way forward.
The leader then said that Singaporeans must awaken to the fact that without a vibrant and democratic society where open exchange of ideas and freedom of expression are valued, the future of Singapore is bleak.
“For the sake of our nation, the PAP’s one-party rule must end,” Dr Chee stressed.
Here is what SDP wrote in full:

Singapore Democrats
Education Minister (Higher Education and Skills) Ong Ye Kung’s suggestion that the PAP’s continued one-party rule is the best course for Singapore’s future is at complete odds with reality.
It is precisely the lack of a democratic, checks-and-balance system that has gotten the country into the current sorry state of affairs in the first place. More worryingly, it clouds the out-look for our nation’s future.
For example, it is the PAP’s self-interested and unchecked policy of importing excessive numbers of foreign workers that has caused Singaporeans much pain and hardship.
Jobs of locals have been displaced and wages depressed because of the mass and sudden influx of foreigners. The cost of living for citizens have also increased as a result while productivity growth has remained at near zero percent.
There is no mistaking that the policy has lowered the quality of life for our people, harmed the overall economy and made it difficult for our nation to progress.
But bringing in foreigners has allowed the ministers to engineer high-GDP growth through the collection of foreign workers’ levies, housing expenses, GST, etc. As ministers peg their pay to GDP growth, they have rewarded themselves handsomely with annual salaries to the tune of millions of dollars.
All this could take place because there was no opposition in Parliament to keep the PAP in check. The party did as it pleased leading to the dangerous situation in which Singapore finds itself today.
Another horrendous situation that Singaporeans are stuck with is the retention of our CPF money. It is the unchecked one-party rule that has allowed the PAP to blatantly rescind its promise to return us our CPF savings in full. This has resulted in retirees left out in the cold with little or no income.
Without political opposition, the PAP is also able to immerse itself in the commercial sector leading Singapore to become one of the most, according to the Crony-Capitalism Index, cronyistic economies in the world.
The government’s domination of the domestic commercial sector through unproductive GLCs has stifled the growth of the private entrepreneurial sector and the development of an innovative culture – areas that Singapore depends on for its future economic survival.
It has also led to the crushing of workers’ rights, allowing GLCs like the Surbana Jurong to terminate its workers without accountability.
It is frightening that at this juncture of Singapore’s development and with a rapidly changing world we face, PAP ministers like Ong Ye Kung still cling on to the out-dated and reality-free view that a one-party rule is the way forward.
Singaporeans must awaken to the fact that without a vibrant and democratic society where open exchange of ideas and freedom of expression are valued, the future of Singapore is bleak. For the sake of our nation, the PAP’s one-party rule must end.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

新柔捷运展延至九月底

我国交通部长许文远和马来西亚交通部长陆兆福,在今早的联合记者会上透露,两国签署新柔捷运(RTS)补充协议,将该计划展延至今年9月30日。 不过,马方需为此支付我国60万新元的延期费用。 许文远和陆兆福是在今早11时,于我国港务局大厦进行新柔捷运补充协议签署仪式。 许文远表示,马方展延计划以检讨新柔捷运项目的可行性和成本,而我国则会慎重考虑对方提出的建议。 他补充,展延计划将使得与此项目的陆路交通管理局承包商和竞标者受影响,而他们也十分关注项目的未来进展。而新加坡政府叫关注如何解决关卡拥挤的方案。 陆兆福:仍希望新柔地铁落实 至于马国交长陆兆福强调,上述支付费用并非一项赔偿,“在旧有协议并无可展延计划的条文,此次则是和新加坡基于友好精神达成共识。” 他表示,马国仍希望新柔捷运能落实,不过成本是该国的最大考量。 如果新柔捷运无法复工,将视为马国已终止该计划,也需赔偿予我国已投入的费用,约为6千600万新元。 在今年3月,马国已要求展延新柔捷运半年。马方需为该计划承担40亿令吉(约13亿3000万新元)费用,其余60巴仙费用则由我国承担。该捷运原定于2024年投入运作。 除了庞大的工程成本外,马方也面对包括征地赔偿等费用,无形中加重该国政府的成本负担。 此前,有消息指其中一地段涉及柔佛苏丹依布拉欣陛下名下土地,以致中央政府必须赔偿4亿9500万令吉;不过后来苏丹则回应若该地段确实用作发展,愿献出土地。…

担忧疫情反弹 颜金勇:无意过早、仓促放宽措施

卫生部长颜金勇表示,政府无意过早或仓促恢复更多社会或经济活动,担忧若感染病例回升,这将促使当局需要重新落实一些限制措施。 颜金勇在国会针对议员提问时,这么表示。其中碧山大巴窑集选区议员钟奇雄询及,目前社区感染病例已下降,政府是否考虑,若工作场所符合安全措施,让那些雇员返回职场工作。 至于蒙巴登区议员林谋泉则提及,尽管不是要让夜店或酒吧重开,但是否能让餐饮业者允许数名顾客堂食。 但颜金勇指出,若允许堂食,这也意味着允许民众在餐饮店里群聚;若堂食或允许,也没有理由再禁止再外头的其他社群聚集。 他补充,这就相当于第二阶段:允许社会民众在特定人数下聚集。对于高风险的活动,例如戏院、博物馆、夜店、娱乐场所等,当局仍会采取谨慎态度。 早前,日本和韩国都曾传出疫情出现反弹现象。韩国原本已复课,如今又被迫再次回归线上教学。 另一方面,针对接受检测的住宿舍外籍客工,他表示直到8、9月份,才能完成所有客工的冠病检测。 他指出第一阶段放宽措施,我国采取谨慎态度,也希望国人能谅解。  

Malaysian AGC contradicts AG’s directions in the case of a Singaporean Man

On October 9 2018, the Malaysian Immigration Department detained Gilbert Louis, a…

IDA defends hiring of employee accused of possessing fake MBA

Nisha Padmanabhan is an employee of the Infocomm Development Authority (IDA) of…