Singapore Police Force (SPF) has announced that it is investigating 30 subjects, aged between 21 to 56, for their suspected involvement in a public assembly without a police permit at Sembawang Park.
The Police stated that on 21 January 2017 at about 6.50pm, the group, comprising males and females, gathered at Sembawang Park. Some of them were holding placards.
Preliminary investigation revealed that the subjects were there to show their support for “Jallikattu” and the ongoing protest in India against its ban.
The Police said that it would like to remind the public that organising or participating in a public assembly without a police permit is illegal in Singapore.
“Foreigners visiting or living in Singapore have to abide by our laws. They should not import the politics of their own countries into Singapore. Those who break the law will be dealt with firmly, and this may include the termination of visas or work passes, where applicable,” it wrote.
According to Wikipedia, Jallikattu (or Sallikkattu), also known as eru thazhuvuthal and manju virattu, is a traditional sport in which a Bos indicus bull, commonly of the Kangayam breed, is released into a crowd of people.
Multiple human participants attempt to grab the large hump of the bull with both arms and hang on to it while the bull attempts to escape. Participants hold the hump for as long as possible, attempting to bring the bull to a stop. In some cases, participants must ride long enough to remove flags on the bull’s horns.

Competitors taking part in the bull taming sport of jallikattu on January 16, 2014 in Alanganallur, Tamil Nadu, India. Jallikattu was banned in 2015 by Supreme Court.from Shutterstock.com
Competitors taking part in the bull taming sport of jallikattu on January 16, 2014 in Alanganallur, Tamil Nadu, India. Jallikattu was banned in 2015 by Supreme Court.from Shutterstock.com
Jallikattu is typically practiced in the Indian state of Tamil Nadu as a part of Pongal celebrations on Mattu Pongal day.
The Animal Welfare Board of India filed a case in the Supreme Court of India for an outright ban on Jallikattu because of the cruelty to animals and the threat to public safety involved.
On 27 November 2010, the Supreme Court permitted the Government of Tamil Nadu to allow Jallikattu for five months in a year and directed the District Collectors to make sure that the animals that participate in Jallikattu are registered to the Animal Welfare Board and in return the Board would send its representative to monitor the event.
The Government of Tamil Nadu ordered that ₹2 lakh (US$3,000) be deposited by the organizers in case of an accident or injury during the event and enacted a rule to allow a team of veterinarians be present at the venue for certifying the bulls for participation in the event and to provide treatment for bulls that get injured.
The Ministry of Environment and Forests issued a notification in 2011 that banned the use of bulls as performing animals, thereby banning the event. But the practice continued to be held under Tamil Nadu Regulation of Jallikattu Act No 27 of 2009.
On 7 May 2014, the Supreme Court of India struck down the state law and banned Jallikattu altogether. The Supreme Court noted that any flouting of the ban should result in penalties for cruelty to animals under The Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, 1960.
The court also asked the Government of India to amend the law on preventing cruelty to animals to bring bulls within its ambit. The Supreme Court also ruled that cruelty is inherent in these events, as bulls are not anatomically suited for such activities and making them participate is subjecting them to unnecessary pain and suffering, so such events were outlawed.
In May 2014, the Supreme Court of India banned the practice, citing animal welfare concerns. On 8 January 2016, the Government of India passed an order exempting Jallikattu from all performances where bulls can not be used, effectively reversing the ban. However, on 14 January 2016, the Supreme Court of India upheld its ban on the event, leading to protests all over Tamil Nadu.
On 8 January 2016, the Ministry of Environment and Forests permitted the continuation of the tradition under certain conditions, effectively ending the ban; however, this was overturned by the Supreme Court on 26 July.
On 16 January 2016, the World Youth Organization (WYO) protested at Chennai against the stay on ban on conducting Jallikattu in Tamil Nadu. The WYO also demanded a ban on PETA in India.
On 8 January 2017, some anonymous groups conducted a rally at Chennai Marina opposing the ban on Jallikattu. The participants walked from the lighthouse to the labour statue bearing posters saying ‘save Jallikattu’.
It is reported that there were hundreds of participants in the rally. A few churches openly conducted prayer mass and rally against the Supreme Court ruling. Following the protests at Chennai, many students started rallies in various towns of Tamil Nadu.
After hearing the petitions which were led by the Animal Welfare Board of India challenging central government’s notification, the Supreme Court of India on 12 January ordered a stay, issued notices to the central government and the government of Tamil Nadu and later refused to lift the stay.
Numerous Jallikattu events were held across Tamil Nadu in protest of the ban, and hundreds of participants were detained by police in response.
The Supreme Court has agreed to delay its verdict on Jallikattu for a week following the Centre’s request that doing so would avoid unrest.
The Attorney General Mukul Rahotgi informed the Supreme Court bench that the people of Tamil Nadu were “passionate” about Jallikattu and that the issue was being resolved between the Centre and the State government.
The ban was revoked on 21 January 2017, and the first Jallikattu game post the revoking will be conducted in Alanganallur, Madurai on 22 January 2017, inaugurated by Paneerselvam.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

“幸好有泼马” 总理称我国防疫表现良好

新加坡总理李显龙今日(31日)造访国家传染病中心(NCID),并宣称我国目前在处理新型冠状病毒疫情上表现良好。 迄今为止,我国已累计13例确诊病例,目前都在上述中心接受隔离。 总理称打自中国武汉疫情消息传出,我国就密切留意进展,“实则我们从2003年沙斯事件以来,就已对这类情况有所准备。”他说此次疫情爆发虽然突然,但不为此感到意外,当局也立即设立小组应对。 他指我国能迅速发现上述病毒病例并予以隔离和治疗,并补充医生告知他目前这些病患情况良好。 “但我们必须继续保持警惕,惟也有充分的理由保持信心。” 不过,他在接受媒体访问时,指幸好我国已有《防假消息法》,因为同当年Sars期间不同的是,网络世界有很多谣言,而该法可以粉碎、更正错误消息。 他只一些谣言是“恶意和蓄意的”,旨在制造恐惧和不安。而政府则很快就更正核实消息。

National Day: MediShield premiums increase by up to 511%?

By Leong Sze Hian –   I refer to the National Day…

结婚率创五年新低 经济因素或影响结婚离婚决定

经济上的波动,也可能对伴侣共结连理的决定产生影响,据《海峡时报》报导,去年大部分的离婚原因均与经济因素相关。其两大主因为筹办婚礼过程与购置房子的昂贵开支致使夫妻意见分歧。 据周二(30日)统计处公布,去年已有2万7007对登记结婚的新婚夫妇,比起2017年的2万8212对,创五年来最低。此外,据移民关卡局的调查显示,去年的生育率也是八年来创新低。 另一方面,据统计显示,去年也有7344对离婚夫妇,比起2017年的7578对,也有下降的现象。 其下降缘由,可能因非穆斯林的离婚率减少,而穆斯林的离婚率稍微提升。一些受访者反映经济是他们考量的因素之一,特别是面对经济波动时期。这可能促使去年结婚和离婚人数均下降。 然而,离婚也不如想象中简单,程序中的财产分配与为两人寻找新房子也会透支两人。 求学与创业时间较长,延迟结婚年龄 往年,结婚年龄是处于持续上升的阶段,男性的结婚年龄中数由2008的29.8岁上升至去年的30.2岁;而女性的结婚年龄中数则由2008的27.3岁上升至去年的28.5岁。 对此,国大社会学家陈恩赐(Tan Ern Ser)与新加坡管理大学社会学实践教授Paulin Straughan分析,结婚年龄的上升与求学阶段的延长、发展个人事业的影响和长时间寻找合适伴侣有关。 Paulin…